注意缺陷多动障碍的执行功能与心理理论之间是否存在关联?荟萃分析的系统评价结果。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
D A Ferreira, F L Osório
{"title":"注意缺陷多动障碍的执行功能与心理理论之间是否存在关联?荟萃分析的系统评价结果。","authors":"D A Ferreira, F L Osório","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficits in Executive Function (EF) and Theory of Mind (ToM) are common and significant in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), impacting self-regulation and social interaction. The nature of ToM deficits is believed to be partially associated with preexisting deficits in other core cognitive domains of ADHD, such as EF, which are essential for making mental inferences, especially complex ones. Evaluating these associations at a meta-analytic level is relevant.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic literature review followed by a meta-analysis to identify potential associations between EF and ToM among individuals with ADHD and their healthy counterparts, considering different developmental stages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in seven different databases. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analytic measurement was estimated with the correlation coefficient as the outcome. Due to the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted. Independent meta-analyses were conducted for different EF subdomains and ADHD and healthy control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of age on the outcome of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were analyzed. Moderate associations were found when comparing EF and ToM between individuals with ADHD (0.20-0.38) and healthy subjects (0.02-0.40). No significant differences were found between child and adult samples (<i>p</i> > 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between EF and ToM was significant, with a moderate effect size, although no significant differences were found according to age, the presence of ADHD, or EF subdomains. Future research is suggested to expand the age groups and overcome the methodological limitations indicated in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there associations between Executive Functions and Theory of Mind in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder? Results from a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"D A Ferreira, F L Osório\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617725000190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deficits in Executive Function (EF) and Theory of Mind (ToM) are common and significant in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), impacting self-regulation and social interaction. The nature of ToM deficits is believed to be partially associated with preexisting deficits in other core cognitive domains of ADHD, such as EF, which are essential for making mental inferences, especially complex ones. Evaluating these associations at a meta-analytic level is relevant.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic literature review followed by a meta-analysis to identify potential associations between EF and ToM among individuals with ADHD and their healthy counterparts, considering different developmental stages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in seven different databases. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analytic measurement was estimated with the correlation coefficient as the outcome. Due to the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted. Independent meta-analyses were conducted for different EF subdomains and ADHD and healthy control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of age on the outcome of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were analyzed. Moderate associations were found when comparing EF and ToM between individuals with ADHD (0.20-0.38) and healthy subjects (0.02-0.40). No significant differences were found between child and adult samples (<i>p</i> > 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between EF and ToM was significant, with a moderate effect size, although no significant differences were found according to age, the presence of ADHD, or EF subdomains. Future research is suggested to expand the age groups and overcome the methodological limitations indicated in this review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725000190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725000190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:执行功能缺陷(EF)和心理理论缺陷(ToM)在注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中普遍且显著,影响自我调节和社会交往。ToM缺陷的本质被认为部分与ADHD的其他核心认知领域存在的缺陷有关,比如EF,这是进行心理推理,尤其是复杂推理所必需的。在元分析水平上评估这些关联是相关的。目的:通过系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,在考虑不同发育阶段的情况下,确定ADHD患者和健康人群EF和ToM之间的潜在关联。方法:对7个不同的数据库进行系统回顾。研究的方法学质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。meta分析测量以相关系数作为结果。由于存在异质性,采用随机效应模型。对不同EF子域、ADHD和健康对照组进行独立荟萃分析。进行亚组分析以检验年龄对感兴趣结果的影响。结果:共分析了15项研究。比较ADHD个体EF和ToM与健康受试者(0.02-0.40)之间的相关性(0.20-0.38)。儿童和成人样本间无显著差异(p < 0.20)。结论:EF和ToM之间的关联是显著的,具有中等效应量,尽管没有发现年龄、ADHD存在或EF子域的显著差异。未来的研究建议扩大年龄组并克服本综述中指出的方法局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are there associations between Executive Functions and Theory of Mind in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder? Results from a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Deficits in Executive Function (EF) and Theory of Mind (ToM) are common and significant in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), impacting self-regulation and social interaction. The nature of ToM deficits is believed to be partially associated with preexisting deficits in other core cognitive domains of ADHD, such as EF, which are essential for making mental inferences, especially complex ones. Evaluating these associations at a meta-analytic level is relevant.

Objective: To conduct a systematic literature review followed by a meta-analysis to identify potential associations between EF and ToM among individuals with ADHD and their healthy counterparts, considering different developmental stages.

Method: A systematic review was conducted in seven different databases. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analytic measurement was estimated with the correlation coefficient as the outcome. Due to the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted. Independent meta-analyses were conducted for different EF subdomains and ADHD and healthy control groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of age on the outcome of interest.

Results: Fifteen studies were analyzed. Moderate associations were found when comparing EF and ToM between individuals with ADHD (0.20-0.38) and healthy subjects (0.02-0.40). No significant differences were found between child and adult samples (p > 0.20).

Conclusion: The association between EF and ToM was significant, with a moderate effect size, although no significant differences were found according to age, the presence of ADHD, or EF subdomains. Future research is suggested to expand the age groups and overcome the methodological limitations indicated in this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信