茁壮成长:在危机稳定中心进行短暂的以恢复为中心的干预的可行性、可接受性和社会有效性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd
{"title":"茁壮成长:在危机稳定中心进行短暂的以恢复为中心的干预的可行性、可接受性和社会有效性。","authors":"Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 3","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sltb.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"e70021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危机稳定中心(CSCs)是危机应对系统的重要组成部分,988生命线的扩张可能会促进急诊科的分流。为了最大限度地提高CSC护理的质量和有效性,需要简短的心理治疗干预,重点是恢复,匹配CSC工作流程,并具有减少自杀企图和死亡的效力,但目前还不存在。本研究的目的是建立一种新颖的、超简短的、60分钟的心理治疗干预的可行性、可接受性、适当性和社会有效性——走向希望、恢复、人际关系、价值观和危机参与(THRIVE-C)。方法:我们招募了CSC利益相关者(n = 15)和CSC研究治疗师(n = 5)来完成调查,随后对CSC客人(n = 54)进行了THRIVE-C的试点研究。结果:CSC利益相关者、研究治疗师和来访者认为THRIVE是可行的、可接受的、适当的和社会有效的。CSC的客人对THRIVE-C的体验是满意的,建立了积极的治疗联盟(纽带),91%的客人在出院后赞同参加门诊心理治疗预约的行为意愿。此外,94%的受访者完成了THRIVE的所有阶段,表明他们已经做好了从自杀中恢复的临床准备,而不仅仅是身体安全或稳定。结论:初步研究结果表明,需要进一步开发和测试THRIVE。试验注册:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符NCT05558891)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.

Background: Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).

Methods: We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).

Results: CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.

Conclusion: Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.

Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信