Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd
{"title":"茁壮成长:在危机稳定中心进行短暂的以恢复为中心的干预的可行性、可接受性和社会有效性。","authors":"Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 3","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer D Lockman, Anthony R Pisani, Breanna P Angerer, Adam C Graham, Jacob Henry, Fallan Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sltb.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"e70021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.
Background: Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) are a critical component of the crisis response system and the 988 Lifeline expansion that may promote ED diversion. To maximize CSC care quality and effectiveness, brief psychotherapy interventions that focus on recovery, match CSC workflows, and have the potency to reduce suicide attempts and deaths are needed but do not exist. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and social validity of a novel, ultra-brief, 60-min psychotherapy intervention-Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Connection, Values, and Engagement for Crisis (THRIVE-C).
Methods: We recruited CSC stakeholders (n = 15) and CSC study therapists (n = 5) to complete surveys, followed by a pilot study of THRIVE-C with CSC guests (n = 54).
Results: CSC stakeholders, study therapists, and guests found THRIVE feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and socially valid. CSC guests experienced THRIVE-C as satisfactory, established a positive therapeutic alliance (bond), and 91% of guests endorsed behavioral intentions to attend outpatient psychotherapy appointments after discharge. Further, 94% of guests completed all phases of THRIVE, demonstrating clinical readiness to work on suicide recovery beyond physical safety or stabilization from suicide alone.
Conclusion: Preliminary findings suggest that further development and testing of THRIVE are needed.
Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT05558891).
期刊介绍:
An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.