Amanda K Chan, Kelsie Bogyo, Alexa R Geltzeiler, Yuan Zhang, Priyanka Ahimaz
{"title":"试点教育模块同意外显子组测序在非遗传学医生在医疗机构。","authors":"Amanda K Chan, Kelsie Bogyo, Alexa R Geltzeiler, Yuan Zhang, Priyanka Ahimaz","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Demand for genetic testing has expanded exome sequencing (ES) utilization into subspecialty clinics without genetics providers. This trend forces non-genetics physicians (NGPs) to facilitate patient consent for genetic testing. However, research on NGPs' knowledge of consent elements (CK) required for ES has not been explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Columbia University NGPs were invited to take a survey (premodule survey [PrS]) assessing CK for ES. Educational modules on ES were then created and sent to NGP participants. A postmodule survey (PoS) was sent to NGPs a month later to assess the change in CK scores. Alpha was set at ≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen participants completed the PrS and PoS. Overall PrS CK scores were low (mean = 8, SD 1.6). There was no difference in PrS CK scores between attendings and residents/fellows (P = .2), and PrS CK scores did not correlate with time since medical school graduation (P = .9). PoS CK scores were higher than PrS CK scores (P = .03). Most NGPs (74%) were satisfied with the module.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a need for continuing education of both new and experienced NGPs on best practices for consenting for ES. An online module with information tailored to different specialties could be an effective format for delivering this education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"45 2","pages":"138-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piloting an Educational Module on Consenting for Exome Sequencing Among Non-Genetics Physicians at a Medical Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda K Chan, Kelsie Bogyo, Alexa R Geltzeiler, Yuan Zhang, Priyanka Ahimaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Demand for genetic testing has expanded exome sequencing (ES) utilization into subspecialty clinics without genetics providers. This trend forces non-genetics physicians (NGPs) to facilitate patient consent for genetic testing. However, research on NGPs' knowledge of consent elements (CK) required for ES has not been explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Columbia University NGPs were invited to take a survey (premodule survey [PrS]) assessing CK for ES. Educational modules on ES were then created and sent to NGP participants. A postmodule survey (PoS) was sent to NGPs a month later to assess the change in CK scores. Alpha was set at ≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen participants completed the PrS and PoS. Overall PrS CK scores were low (mean = 8, SD 1.6). There was no difference in PrS CK scores between attendings and residents/fellows (P = .2), and PrS CK scores did not correlate with time since medical school graduation (P = .9). PoS CK scores were higher than PrS CK scores (P = .03). Most NGPs (74%) were satisfied with the module.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a need for continuing education of both new and experienced NGPs on best practices for consenting for ES. An online module with information tailored to different specialties could be an effective format for delivering this education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"138-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000582\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Piloting an Educational Module on Consenting for Exome Sequencing Among Non-Genetics Physicians at a Medical Institution.
Introduction: Demand for genetic testing has expanded exome sequencing (ES) utilization into subspecialty clinics without genetics providers. This trend forces non-genetics physicians (NGPs) to facilitate patient consent for genetic testing. However, research on NGPs' knowledge of consent elements (CK) required for ES has not been explored.
Methods: Columbia University NGPs were invited to take a survey (premodule survey [PrS]) assessing CK for ES. Educational modules on ES were then created and sent to NGP participants. A postmodule survey (PoS) was sent to NGPs a month later to assess the change in CK scores. Alpha was set at ≤0.05.
Results: Nineteen participants completed the PrS and PoS. Overall PrS CK scores were low (mean = 8, SD 1.6). There was no difference in PrS CK scores between attendings and residents/fellows (P = .2), and PrS CK scores did not correlate with time since medical school graduation (P = .9). PoS CK scores were higher than PrS CK scores (P = .03). Most NGPs (74%) were satisfied with the module.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest a need for continuing education of both new and experienced NGPs on best practices for consenting for ES. An online module with information tailored to different specialties could be an effective format for delivering this education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.