自恋人格量表的探索性结构方程建模方法:NPI-13简要版本的支持及其与其他变量关系的证据。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rossella Bottaro, Giuseppe Craparo, Palmira Faraci
{"title":"自恋人格量表的探索性结构方程建模方法:NPI-13简要版本的支持及其与其他变量关系的证据。","authors":"Rossella Bottaro, Giuseppe Craparo, Palmira Faraci","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is the most commonly used psychometric instrument for assessing narcissistic traits in the general population. Despite its widespread adoption, various factorial structures have been proposed. The present study aimed to provide new evidence for the NPI factorial solution using the not-yet-explored Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) approach and to improve understanding of its relationship with other variables.<i>Method</i>:We administered the NPI along with measures of anxiety, depression, stress, self-esteem, and loneliness to 583 participants (50.8% male, M age = 30.96, SD = 12.12) in a survey online. We compared confirmatory factor analyses and ESEMs for both the long and brief versions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NPI-13 ESEM model was the optimal fitting model (ꭓ2=72.060, df = 42, CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = .035 [.021-.049]) also for its bifactorial solution. Moreover, our findings supported the evidence based on relations to other variables for the NPI-13.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our results argued the use of a multidimensional brief version of the NPI and supported the ESEM's advantages for explaining the factorial structure of complex psychological constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"22 2","pages":"125-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Support for the NPI-13 Brief Version and Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables.\",\"authors\":\"Rossella Bottaro, Giuseppe Craparo, Palmira Faraci\",\"doi\":\"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is the most commonly used psychometric instrument for assessing narcissistic traits in the general population. Despite its widespread adoption, various factorial structures have been proposed. The present study aimed to provide new evidence for the NPI factorial solution using the not-yet-explored Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) approach and to improve understanding of its relationship with other variables.<i>Method</i>:We administered the NPI along with measures of anxiety, depression, stress, self-esteem, and loneliness to 583 participants (50.8% male, M age = 30.96, SD = 12.12) in a survey online. We compared confirmatory factor analyses and ESEMs for both the long and brief versions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NPI-13 ESEM model was the optimal fitting model (ꭓ2=72.060, df = 42, CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = .035 [.021-.049]) also for its bifactorial solution. Moreover, our findings supported the evidence based on relations to other variables for the NPI-13.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our results argued the use of a multidimensional brief version of the NPI and supported the ESEM's advantages for explaining the factorial structure of complex psychological constructs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"125-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自恋人格量表(NPI)是评估普通人群自恋特征最常用的心理测量工具。尽管它被广泛采用,但已经提出了各种析因结构。本研究旨在利用尚未探索的探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)方法为NPI因子解提供新的证据,并提高对其与其他变量关系的理解。方法:我们对583名在线调查参与者(50.8%男性,年龄M = 30.96, SD = 12.12)进行NPI以及焦虑、抑郁、压力、自尊和孤独感的测量。我们比较了验证性因子分析和ESEMs的长版本和短版本。结果:NPI-13 ESEM模型为最佳拟合模型(ꭓ2=72.060,df = 42, CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.035[.021 ~ .049])。此外,我们的研究结果支持基于NPI-13与其他变量关系的证据。结论:总之,我们的研究结果支持了NPI多维简短版本的使用,并支持了ESEM在解释复杂心理构念的析因结构方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Support for the NPI-13 Brief Version and Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables.

Objective: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is the most commonly used psychometric instrument for assessing narcissistic traits in the general population. Despite its widespread adoption, various factorial structures have been proposed. The present study aimed to provide new evidence for the NPI factorial solution using the not-yet-explored Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) approach and to improve understanding of its relationship with other variables.Method:We administered the NPI along with measures of anxiety, depression, stress, self-esteem, and loneliness to 583 participants (50.8% male, M age = 30.96, SD = 12.12) in a survey online. We compared confirmatory factor analyses and ESEMs for both the long and brief versions.

Results: The NPI-13 ESEM model was the optimal fitting model (ꭓ2=72.060, df = 42, CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = .035 [.021-.049]) also for its bifactorial solution. Moreover, our findings supported the evidence based on relations to other variables for the NPI-13.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our results argued the use of a multidimensional brief version of the NPI and supported the ESEM's advantages for explaining the factorial structure of complex psychological constructs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信