目标位置的统计学习主动引导注意力。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.3758/s13423-025-02710-9
Aidai Golan, Aniruddha Ramgir, Dominique Lamy
{"title":"目标位置的统计学习主动引导注意力。","authors":"Aidai Golan, Aniruddha Ramgir, Dominique Lamy","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02710-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our perceptual system is highly sensitive to statistical regularities in our environment. In particular, we respond faster to targets that appear in frequently attended locations-a phenomenon known as target-location probability learning (LPL). Is attention proactively aligned with the high-probability target location, or reactively allocated to that location when the learning context is detected? The studies that addressed this question tested whether a spatial attentional bias learned in one task transfers to another. However, they yielded conflicting findings and were open to alternative accounts. We reexamined whether LPL-guided attention is proactively allocated to the high-probability target location while addressing these previous studies' potential caveats, in two experiments. During learning, the search target appeared more often at one location than elsewhere, and during extinction, all search target locations were equiprobable. In both learning and extinction, letter-probe trials were interspersed among the search trials. We found that LPL acquired during search transferred to the letter-probe task during both learning and extinction. Importantly, during extinction, participants continued to prioritize the previously high-probability location on both search and letter-probe trials, even when they were informed after the learning phase that the bias would be discontinued and were asked to start their search at the location indicated by an arrow precue. We conclude that LPL guides attention proactively and inflexibly.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":"2410-2419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.\",\"authors\":\"Aidai Golan, Aniruddha Ramgir, Dominique Lamy\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13423-025-02710-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our perceptual system is highly sensitive to statistical regularities in our environment. In particular, we respond faster to targets that appear in frequently attended locations-a phenomenon known as target-location probability learning (LPL). Is attention proactively aligned with the high-probability target location, or reactively allocated to that location when the learning context is detected? The studies that addressed this question tested whether a spatial attentional bias learned in one task transfers to another. However, they yielded conflicting findings and were open to alternative accounts. We reexamined whether LPL-guided attention is proactively allocated to the high-probability target location while addressing these previous studies' potential caveats, in two experiments. During learning, the search target appeared more often at one location than elsewhere, and during extinction, all search target locations were equiprobable. In both learning and extinction, letter-probe trials were interspersed among the search trials. We found that LPL acquired during search transferred to the letter-probe task during both learning and extinction. Importantly, during extinction, participants continued to prioritize the previously high-probability location on both search and letter-probe trials, even when they were informed after the learning phase that the bias would be discontinued and were asked to start their search at the location indicated by an arrow precue. We conclude that LPL guides attention proactively and inflexibly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2410-2419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02710-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02710-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的感知系统对环境中的统计规律高度敏感。特别是,我们对出现在经常出现的地点的目标反应更快,这种现象被称为目标位置概率学习(LPL)。注意力是主动地与高概率目标位置对齐,还是在检测到学习环境时被动地分配到该位置?解决这个问题的研究测试了在一个任务中习得的空间注意偏差是否会转移到另一个任务中。然而,他们得出了相互矛盾的结果,并对其他说法持开放态度。在两个实验中,我们重新研究了lpl引导的注意力是否主动分配到高概率目标位置,同时解决了这些先前研究的潜在警告。在学习过程中,搜索目标在一个位置出现的频率高于其他位置,在消失过程中,所有搜索目标位置都是等概率的。在学习和消失试验中,字母探测试验穿插在搜索试验中。我们发现在搜索过程中获得的LPL在学习和消除过程中都转移到字母探测任务中。重要的是,在消失过程中,参与者继续在搜索和字母探测试验中优先考虑先前高概率的位置,即使他们在学习阶段后被告知偏差将停止,并被要求在箭头提示的位置开始搜索。我们得出结论,LPL引导注意力主动和不灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.

Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.

Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.

Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.

Our perceptual system is highly sensitive to statistical regularities in our environment. In particular, we respond faster to targets that appear in frequently attended locations-a phenomenon known as target-location probability learning (LPL). Is attention proactively aligned with the high-probability target location, or reactively allocated to that location when the learning context is detected? The studies that addressed this question tested whether a spatial attentional bias learned in one task transfers to another. However, they yielded conflicting findings and were open to alternative accounts. We reexamined whether LPL-guided attention is proactively allocated to the high-probability target location while addressing these previous studies' potential caveats, in two experiments. During learning, the search target appeared more often at one location than elsewhere, and during extinction, all search target locations were equiprobable. In both learning and extinction, letter-probe trials were interspersed among the search trials. We found that LPL acquired during search transferred to the letter-probe task during both learning and extinction. Importantly, during extinction, participants continued to prioritize the previously high-probability location on both search and letter-probe trials, even when they were informed after the learning phase that the bias would be discontinued and were asked to start their search at the location indicated by an arrow precue. We conclude that LPL guides attention proactively and inflexibly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信