腹膜透析导管上的细菌生物膜:回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Aichun Liu, Huiping Zhao, Bei Wu, Shuying Zheng, Lixia Lu, Jie Qiao, Xinxin Chu, Chuncui Men, Yuting He, Li Zuo, Mei Wang
{"title":"腹膜透析导管上的细菌生物膜:回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Aichun Liu, Huiping Zhao, Bei Wu, Shuying Zheng, Lixia Lu, Jie Qiao, Xinxin Chu, Chuncui Men, Yuting He, Li Zuo, Mei Wang","doi":"10.1177/08968608251331894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Biofilm formation significantly impacts infection risks in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, few studies focused on biofilms on PD catheters. This study aims to explore the formation and characteristics of bacterial biofilm on PD catheters. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on maintenance PD patients from January 2007 to January 2024. We summarized the general characteristics of the patients, the reasons for catheter removal, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results of the PD catheter, and bacterial culture results from the PD effluent. The selected patients were divided into two groups: catheter removal due to peritonitis group (20 cases) and catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (8 cases). <b>Results:</b> (1) The average dialysis duration in catheter removal due to peritonitis group was 84.2 ± 46.6 months, significantly longer than that in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (21.8 ± 18.7 months). Thirteen patients (65.5%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group had a history of peritonitis before the current episode, whereas none in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group had experienced it previously (<i>p</i> = 0.002). (2) Bacterial biofilm was detected in 20 (71.4%) out of 28 patients. Of these, bacterial biofilm was found in 18 patients (90.0%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group, compared to only 2 patients (25.0%) in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). SEM revealed that the bacterial biofilm forms present on the PD catheters were exclusively cocci biofilms. The bacterial culture results from the PD fluid of patients in catheter removal due to peritonitis group indicated that the three most prevalent pathogens were Escherichia coli (7/20), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (3/20), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (3/20). <b>Conclusion:</b> Bacterial biofilm formation on PD catheters is common among long-term PD patients. It is important to note that not all PD catheters removed due to peritonitis exhibit bacterial biofilms, and such biofilms may also be present in patients without peritonitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608251331894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial biofilm on peritoneal dialysis catheters: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Aichun Liu, Huiping Zhao, Bei Wu, Shuying Zheng, Lixia Lu, Jie Qiao, Xinxin Chu, Chuncui Men, Yuting He, Li Zuo, Mei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608251331894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Biofilm formation significantly impacts infection risks in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, few studies focused on biofilms on PD catheters. This study aims to explore the formation and characteristics of bacterial biofilm on PD catheters. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on maintenance PD patients from January 2007 to January 2024. We summarized the general characteristics of the patients, the reasons for catheter removal, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results of the PD catheter, and bacterial culture results from the PD effluent. The selected patients were divided into two groups: catheter removal due to peritonitis group (20 cases) and catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (8 cases). <b>Results:</b> (1) The average dialysis duration in catheter removal due to peritonitis group was 84.2 ± 46.6 months, significantly longer than that in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (21.8 ± 18.7 months). Thirteen patients (65.5%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group had a history of peritonitis before the current episode, whereas none in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group had experienced it previously (<i>p</i> = 0.002). (2) Bacterial biofilm was detected in 20 (71.4%) out of 28 patients. Of these, bacterial biofilm was found in 18 patients (90.0%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group, compared to only 2 patients (25.0%) in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). SEM revealed that the bacterial biofilm forms present on the PD catheters were exclusively cocci biofilms. The bacterial culture results from the PD fluid of patients in catheter removal due to peritonitis group indicated that the three most prevalent pathogens were Escherichia coli (7/20), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (3/20), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (3/20). <b>Conclusion:</b> Bacterial biofilm formation on PD catheters is common among long-term PD patients. It is important to note that not all PD catheters removed due to peritonitis exhibit bacterial biofilms, and such biofilms may also be present in patients without peritonitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8968608251331894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251331894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251331894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:生物膜形成对腹膜透析(PD)患者感染风险有显著影响。然而,很少有研究关注PD导管上的生物膜。本研究旨在探讨PD导管上细菌生物膜的形成及特征。方法:对2007年1月至2024年1月的维持性帕金森病患者进行回顾性研究。我们总结了患者的一般特征,拔管的原因,PD导管的扫描电镜(SEM)结果,以及PD出水的细菌培养结果。选取的患者分为两组:腹膜炎拔管组(20例)和非腹膜炎拔管组(8例)。结果:(1)腹膜炎拔管组平均透析时间为84.2±46.6个月,明显长于非腹膜炎拔管组(21.8±18.7个月)。腹膜炎拔管组有13例(65.5%)患者既往有腹膜炎病史,而非腹膜炎拔管组无一例患者既往有腹膜炎病史(p = 0.002)。(2) 28例患者中有20例(71.4%)检出细菌生物膜。其中,腹膜炎拔管组有18例(90.0%)患者出现细菌生物膜,而非腹膜炎拔管组仅有2例(25.0%)患者出现细菌生物膜(p = 0.002)。扫描电镜显示,PD导管上的细菌生物膜形式仅为球菌生物膜。腹膜炎拔管组PD液细菌培养结果显示,最常见的3种病原菌为大肠杆菌(7/20)、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(3/20)和表皮葡萄球菌(3/20)。结论:PD导管上细菌生物膜的形成在长期PD患者中很常见。值得注意的是,并非所有因腹膜炎而切除的PD导管都有细菌生物膜,这种生物膜也可能存在于没有腹膜炎的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial biofilm on peritoneal dialysis catheters: A retrospective observational study.

Objective: Biofilm formation significantly impacts infection risks in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, few studies focused on biofilms on PD catheters. This study aims to explore the formation and characteristics of bacterial biofilm on PD catheters. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on maintenance PD patients from January 2007 to January 2024. We summarized the general characteristics of the patients, the reasons for catheter removal, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results of the PD catheter, and bacterial culture results from the PD effluent. The selected patients were divided into two groups: catheter removal due to peritonitis group (20 cases) and catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (8 cases). Results: (1) The average dialysis duration in catheter removal due to peritonitis group was 84.2 ± 46.6 months, significantly longer than that in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (21.8 ± 18.7 months). Thirteen patients (65.5%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group had a history of peritonitis before the current episode, whereas none in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group had experienced it previously (p = 0.002). (2) Bacterial biofilm was detected in 20 (71.4%) out of 28 patients. Of these, bacterial biofilm was found in 18 patients (90.0%) in catheter removal due to peritonitis group, compared to only 2 patients (25.0%) in catheter removal due to non-peritonitis group (p = 0.002). SEM revealed that the bacterial biofilm forms present on the PD catheters were exclusively cocci biofilms. The bacterial culture results from the PD fluid of patients in catheter removal due to peritonitis group indicated that the three most prevalent pathogens were Escherichia coli (7/20), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (3/20), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (3/20). Conclusion: Bacterial biofilm formation on PD catheters is common among long-term PD patients. It is important to note that not all PD catheters removed due to peritonitis exhibit bacterial biofilms, and such biofilms may also be present in patients without peritonitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信