整合脑成像特征和重性抑郁症亚型的基因组图谱。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Liangying Yin, Yuping Lin, Jinghong Qiu, Yong Xiang, Ming Li, Xiao Xiao, Simon Sai-Yu Lui, Hon-Cheong So
{"title":"整合脑成像特征和重性抑郁症亚型的基因组图谱。","authors":"Liangying Yin, Yuping Lin, Jinghong Qiu, Yong Xiang, Ming Li, Xiao Xiao, Simon Sai-Yu Lui, Hon-Cheong So","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725001096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating brain imaging features and genomic profiles for the subtyping of major depression.\",\"authors\":\"Liangying Yin, Yuping Lin, Jinghong Qiu, Yong Xiang, Ming Li, Xiao Xiao, Simon Sai-Yu Lui, Hon-Cheong So\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291725001096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"e158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115278/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001096\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将患者精确分层为同质疾病亚组可以解决表型的异质性,并增强对特定亚型的病理生理学的理解。现有文献对重度抑郁障碍(MDD)亚型患者的分型主要采用临床特征。基因组和成像数据可以改善亚型,但由于特征的高维性,需要先进的方法。方法:我们通过整合大脑结构特征、脑组织基因型预测表达水平和临床特征,提出了一种新的MDD疾病亚型框架。使用多视图双聚类方法,我们将患者分为临床和生物学上均匀的亚组。此外,我们提出了识别聚类的因果相关基因的方法。结果:通过内部和外部验证,验证了分型模型的可靠性。高预测强度(PS)(平均PS: 0.896,最小PS: 0.854)是独立数据集中衍生聚类的可泛化性的度量,支持了我们方法的有效性。使用患者结果变量(治疗反应和住院风险)的外部验证证实了所确定的亚组的临床相关性。此外,亚型定义基因与已知的MDD易感基因重叠,并参与相关的生物学途径。此外,基于这些基因的药物重新定位分析优先考虑有希望的亚型特异性治疗候选者。结论:我们的方法成功地将重度抑郁症患者分为具有不同临床预后的亚组。生物学和临床意义亚型的识别可能使更个性化的治疗策略成为可能。这项研究也为疾病亚型提供了一个框架,可以扩展到其他复杂的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating brain imaging features and genomic profiles for the subtyping of major depression.

Background: Precise stratification of patients into homogeneous disease subgroups could address the heterogeneity of phenotypes and enhance understanding of the pathophysiology underlying specific subtypes. Existing literature on subtyping patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) mainly utilized clinical features only. Genomic and imaging data may improve subtyping, but advanced methods are required due to the high dimensionality of features.

Methods: We propose a novel disease subtyping framework for MDD by integrating brain structural features, genotype-predicted expression levels in brain tissues, and clinical features. Using a multi-view biclustering approach, we classify patients into clinically and biologically homogeneous subgroups. Additionally, we propose approaches to identify causally relevant genes for clustering.

Results: We verified the reliability of the subtyping model by internal and external validation. High prediction strengths (PS) (average PS: 0.896, minimum: 0.854), a measure of generalizability of the derived clusters in independent datasets, support the validity of our approach. External validation using patient outcome variables (treatment response and hospitalization risks) confirmed the clinical relevance of the identified subgroups. Furthermore, subtype-defining genes overlapped with known susceptibility genes for MDD and were involved in relevant biological pathways. In addition, drug repositioning analysis based on these genes prioritized promising candidates for subtype-specific treatments.

Conclusions: Our approach successfully stratified MDD patients into subgroups with distinct clinical prognoses. The identification of biologically and clinically meaningful subtypes may enable more personalized treatment strategies. This study also provides a framework for disease subtyping that can be extended to other complex disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信