贝叶斯多水平潜类分析:探索学术能力不同途径的推论与估计。

IF 5.3 3区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
JungWun Lee, D Betsy McCoach, Ofer Harel, Hwan Chung
{"title":"贝叶斯多水平潜类分析:探索学术能力不同途径的推论与估计。","authors":"JungWun Lee, D Betsy McCoach, Ofer Harel, Hwan Chung","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2025.2501341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multilevel latent class profile analysis (MLCPA) is a recently developed technique for understanding latent class dynamics in longitudinal studies; however, conventional maximum likelihood (ML) estimation may face challenges, particularly with small sample sizes or boundary solutions. As an alternative method, we propose a Bayesian estimation for MLCPA by employing non-informative prior distributions. In addition, we shed light on the underflow problem, which denotes a phenomenon such that the logarithm of the likelihood is negative infinity due to the multilevel structure. We perform extensive numerical studies to compare the behaviors of the MLE and the Bayesian estimates and investigate the accuracies of approximated model selection criteria. The simulation study revealed that Bayesian estimates are preferred to ML estimates when the underlying latent classes are well-separated, while the ML estimates are preferred when the underlying latent classes overlap. Utilizing the Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network data, which includes longitudinal academic performance metrics, our analysis uncovers distinct pathways of latent classes for students, further differentiated by latent groups of schools. These findings shed light on the considerable variations in academic proficiency trajectories and thus may offer new perspectives on academic proficiency patterns, with important implications for policy development and targeted educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Multilevel Latent Class Profile Analysis: Inference and Estimation for Exploring the Diverse Pathways to Academic Proficiency.\",\"authors\":\"JungWun Lee, D Betsy McCoach, Ofer Harel, Hwan Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00273171.2025.2501341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multilevel latent class profile analysis (MLCPA) is a recently developed technique for understanding latent class dynamics in longitudinal studies; however, conventional maximum likelihood (ML) estimation may face challenges, particularly with small sample sizes or boundary solutions. As an alternative method, we propose a Bayesian estimation for MLCPA by employing non-informative prior distributions. In addition, we shed light on the underflow problem, which denotes a phenomenon such that the logarithm of the likelihood is negative infinity due to the multilevel structure. We perform extensive numerical studies to compare the behaviors of the MLE and the Bayesian estimates and investigate the accuracies of approximated model selection criteria. The simulation study revealed that Bayesian estimates are preferred to ML estimates when the underlying latent classes are well-separated, while the ML estimates are preferred when the underlying latent classes overlap. Utilizing the Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network data, which includes longitudinal academic performance metrics, our analysis uncovers distinct pathways of latent classes for students, further differentiated by latent groups of schools. These findings shed light on the considerable variations in academic proficiency trajectories and thus may offer new perspectives on academic proficiency patterns, with important implications for policy development and targeted educational interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2501341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2501341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多层次潜在分类分析(MLCPA)是近年来发展起来的一种纵向研究中潜在分类动态的分析方法。然而,传统的最大似然估计可能面临挑战,特别是在小样本量或边界解的情况下。作为替代方法,我们提出了利用非信息先验分布对MLCPA进行贝叶斯估计。此外,我们还揭示了下流问题,这表明由于多层结构,似然的对数是负无穷。我们进行了广泛的数值研究,以比较MLE和贝叶斯估计的行为,并调查近似模型选择标准的准确性。仿真研究表明,当潜在类别分离良好时,贝叶斯估计优于ML估计,而当潜在类别重叠时,ML估计优于贝叶斯估计。利用进度监测和报告网络数据,其中包括纵向学业表现指标,我们的分析揭示了学生潜在班级的不同途径,并进一步根据潜在学校群体进行区分。这些发现揭示了学术水平轨迹的巨大差异,因此可能为学术水平模式提供新的视角,对政策制定和有针对性的教育干预具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian Multilevel Latent Class Profile Analysis: Inference and Estimation for Exploring the Diverse Pathways to Academic Proficiency.

Multilevel latent class profile analysis (MLCPA) is a recently developed technique for understanding latent class dynamics in longitudinal studies; however, conventional maximum likelihood (ML) estimation may face challenges, particularly with small sample sizes or boundary solutions. As an alternative method, we propose a Bayesian estimation for MLCPA by employing non-informative prior distributions. In addition, we shed light on the underflow problem, which denotes a phenomenon such that the logarithm of the likelihood is negative infinity due to the multilevel structure. We perform extensive numerical studies to compare the behaviors of the MLE and the Bayesian estimates and investigate the accuracies of approximated model selection criteria. The simulation study revealed that Bayesian estimates are preferred to ML estimates when the underlying latent classes are well-separated, while the ML estimates are preferred when the underlying latent classes overlap. Utilizing the Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network data, which includes longitudinal academic performance metrics, our analysis uncovers distinct pathways of latent classes for students, further differentiated by latent groups of schools. These findings shed light on the considerable variations in academic proficiency trajectories and thus may offer new perspectives on academic proficiency patterns, with important implications for policy development and targeted educational interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Multivariate Behavioral Research 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信