28天辛伐他汀给药对抑郁风险健康参与者情绪加工、奖励学习、工作记忆和唾液皮质醇的影响:OxSTEP,一项在线实验医学试验。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Riccardo De Giorgi, Shona Waters, Amy L Gillespie, Alice M G Quinton, Michael J Colwell, Susannah E Murphy, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer
{"title":"28天辛伐他汀给药对抑郁风险健康参与者情绪加工、奖励学习、工作记忆和唾液皮质醇的影响:OxSTEP,一项在线实验医学试验。","authors":"Riccardo De Giorgi, Shona Waters, Amy L Gillespie, Alice M G Quinton, Michael J Colwell, Susannah E Murphy, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725001187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statins are among the most prescribed medications worldwide. Both beneficial (e.g. antidepressant and pro-cognitive) and adverse (e.g. depressogenic and cognitive-impairing) mental health outcomes have been described in clinical studies. The underlying neuropsychological mechanisms, whether positive or negative, are, however, not established. Clarifying such activities has implications for the safe prescribing and repurposing potential of these drugs, especially in people with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experimental medicine study, we investigated the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and waking salivary cortisol (WSC) in 101 people at-risk for depression due to reported high loneliness scores (mean 7.3 ± 1.2 on the UCLA scale). This trial was largely conducted during periods of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2021-February 2023), and we employed a fully remote design within a UK-wide sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High retention rates, minimal outlier data, and typical main effects of task condition (e.g. emotion) were seen in all cognitive tasks, indicating this approach was comparable to in-person testing. After 28 days, we found no statistically significant differences (F's < 3.0, p's > 0.20) for any of the measures of emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and WSC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results do not substantiate concerns regarding adverse neuropsychiatric events due to statins and support the safety of their prescribing in at-risk populations. Although other unmeasured cognitive processes may be involved, our null findings are also in line with more recent clinical evidence suggesting statins do not show antidepressant or pro-cognitive efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of 28-day simvastatin administration on emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and salivary cortisol in healthy participants at-risk for depression: OxSTEP, an online experimental medicine trial.\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo De Giorgi, Shona Waters, Amy L Gillespie, Alice M G Quinton, Michael J Colwell, Susannah E Murphy, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291725001187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Statins are among the most prescribed medications worldwide. Both beneficial (e.g. antidepressant and pro-cognitive) and adverse (e.g. depressogenic and cognitive-impairing) mental health outcomes have been described in clinical studies. The underlying neuropsychological mechanisms, whether positive or negative, are, however, not established. Clarifying such activities has implications for the safe prescribing and repurposing potential of these drugs, especially in people with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experimental medicine study, we investigated the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and waking salivary cortisol (WSC) in 101 people at-risk for depression due to reported high loneliness scores (mean 7.3 ± 1.2 on the UCLA scale). This trial was largely conducted during periods of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2021-February 2023), and we employed a fully remote design within a UK-wide sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High retention rates, minimal outlier data, and typical main effects of task condition (e.g. emotion) were seen in all cognitive tasks, indicating this approach was comparable to in-person testing. After 28 days, we found no statistically significant differences (F's < 3.0, p's > 0.20) for any of the measures of emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and WSC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results do not substantiate concerns regarding adverse neuropsychiatric events due to statins and support the safety of their prescribing in at-risk populations. Although other unmeasured cognitive processes may be involved, our null findings are also in line with more recent clinical evidence suggesting statins do not show antidepressant or pro-cognitive efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"e155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001187\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725001187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:他汀类药物是全世界最常用的处方药之一。临床研究描述了有益的(如抗抑郁和促进认知)和不利的(如致抑郁和损害认知)心理健康结果。然而,潜在的神经心理学机制,无论是积极的还是消极的,还没有确定。澄清这些活动对这些药物的安全处方和重新利用潜力具有重要意义,特别是对抑郁症患者。方法:在这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的实验医学研究中,我们研究了辛伐他汀对101名因孤独感评分高(UCLA评分平均7.3±1.2)而有抑郁风险的人的情绪加工、奖励学习、工作记忆和清醒时唾液皮质醇(WSC)的影响。该试验主要是在COVID-19大流行(2021年7月至2023年2月)造成的社会距离期间进行的,我们在全英国范围内的样本中采用了完全远程设计。结果:在所有认知任务中都可以看到高保留率,最小的异常数据和典型的任务条件(如情绪)的主要影响,表明该方法与现场测试相当。28天后,我们发现情绪处理、奖励学习、工作记忆和WSC的任何测量都没有统计学上的显著差异(F = 0.20)。结论:研究结果没有证实对他汀类药物不良神经精神事件的担忧,并支持在高危人群中使用他汀类药物的安全性。虽然可能涉及其他未测量的认知过程,但我们的无效发现也与最近的临床证据一致,表明他汀类药物没有抗抑郁或促进认知的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of 28-day simvastatin administration on emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and salivary cortisol in healthy participants at-risk for depression: OxSTEP, an online experimental medicine trial.

Background: Statins are among the most prescribed medications worldwide. Both beneficial (e.g. antidepressant and pro-cognitive) and adverse (e.g. depressogenic and cognitive-impairing) mental health outcomes have been described in clinical studies. The underlying neuropsychological mechanisms, whether positive or negative, are, however, not established. Clarifying such activities has implications for the safe prescribing and repurposing potential of these drugs, especially in people with depression.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled experimental medicine study, we investigated the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and waking salivary cortisol (WSC) in 101 people at-risk for depression due to reported high loneliness scores (mean 7.3 ± 1.2 on the UCLA scale). This trial was largely conducted during periods of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2021-February 2023), and we employed a fully remote design within a UK-wide sample.

Results: High retention rates, minimal outlier data, and typical main effects of task condition (e.g. emotion) were seen in all cognitive tasks, indicating this approach was comparable to in-person testing. After 28 days, we found no statistically significant differences (F's < 3.0, p's > 0.20) for any of the measures of emotional processing, reward learning, working memory, and WSC.

Conclusions: Study results do not substantiate concerns regarding adverse neuropsychiatric events due to statins and support the safety of their prescribing in at-risk populations. Although other unmeasured cognitive processes may be involved, our null findings are also in line with more recent clinical evidence suggesting statins do not show antidepressant or pro-cognitive efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信