内直肌y型切开与后赤道型肌内固定治疗会聚过度的比较。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2543-1425
Christoph Kalantari, Oliver Ehrt, Martin M Nentwich
{"title":"内直肌y型切开与后赤道型肌内固定治疗会聚过度的比较。","authors":"Christoph Kalantari, Oliver Ehrt, Martin M Nentwich","doi":"10.1055/a-2543-1425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to the bimedial recession of the rectus muscle, two surgical procedures are available to reduce torque: retro-equatorial myopexy (Cüppers-Fadenoperation) and the Y-split of the medial rectus muscle. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the latter two surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 113 consecutive patients who presented for surgical treatment of convergence excess at the University Hospital of Würzburg between October 2006 and October 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In 2006 - 2014. All patients underwent retro-equatorial myopexy, whereas from 2015 onwards, Y-splitting was the treatment of choice. Orthoptic examinations were performed preoperatively, on the first postoperative day, four months postoperatively and in the longer postoperative course - always with full correction of hyperopia as measured in cycloplegia. The distance and near squint angles in the alternating cover test, the convergence excess and the complication rate as well as the need for repeat surgery were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting significantly reduced the far and near strabismus angles and convergence excess in all postoperative controls, with no significant difference between the two groups at the four-month follow-up (Levene's variance homogeneity test [far angle p = 0.151; near angle p = 0.114]). The incidence of intraoperative complications and the need for reoperation for over- and undercorrection were slightly lower with the Y-split.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting of the medial rectus muscle are suitable surgical procedures for the treatment of convergence excess. Y-splitting appears to be safer intraoperatively and easier to learn, due to the absence of retro-equatorial fixation, which is associated with fewer complications. However, revision may be more difficult, this should be considered in the event of loss of information regarding the Y-splitting technique and written documentation of the procedure should always be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":"242 5","pages":"570-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Convergence Excess: Y-Split and Retro-equatorial Myopexy of the Medial Rectus Muscle.\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Kalantari, Oliver Ehrt, Martin M Nentwich\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2543-1425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to the bimedial recession of the rectus muscle, two surgical procedures are available to reduce torque: retro-equatorial myopexy (Cüppers-Fadenoperation) and the Y-split of the medial rectus muscle. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the latter two surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 113 consecutive patients who presented for surgical treatment of convergence excess at the University Hospital of Würzburg between October 2006 and October 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In 2006 - 2014. All patients underwent retro-equatorial myopexy, whereas from 2015 onwards, Y-splitting was the treatment of choice. Orthoptic examinations were performed preoperatively, on the first postoperative day, four months postoperatively and in the longer postoperative course - always with full correction of hyperopia as measured in cycloplegia. The distance and near squint angles in the alternating cover test, the convergence excess and the complication rate as well as the need for repeat surgery were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting significantly reduced the far and near strabismus angles and convergence excess in all postoperative controls, with no significant difference between the two groups at the four-month follow-up (Levene's variance homogeneity test [far angle p = 0.151; near angle p = 0.114]). The incidence of intraoperative complications and the need for reoperation for over- and undercorrection were slightly lower with the Y-split.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting of the medial rectus muscle are suitable surgical procedures for the treatment of convergence excess. Y-splitting appears to be safer intraoperatively and easier to learn, due to the absence of retro-equatorial fixation, which is associated with fewer complications. However, revision may be more difficult, this should be considered in the event of loss of information regarding the Y-splitting technique and written documentation of the procedure should always be provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\"242 5\",\"pages\":\"570-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2543-1425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2543-1425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除了直肌双侧后退外,还有两种手术方法可用于减少扭矩:后赤道肌固定术(c ppers- fadenoperation)和内侧直肌y型切开。本研究的目的是比较后两种手术技术的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2006年10月至2020年10月期间在维尔茨堡大学医院接受会聚过度手术治疗的113例患者的资料。2006 - 2014年。所有患者均接受后赤道性近视,而从2015年起,y型分裂成为首选治疗方法。术前、术后第一天、术后4个月以及术后更长时间内均进行视正检查,并始终以单眼麻痹的远视矫正为标准。测量交替覆盖试验的距离和近斜视角度、会聚过度、并发症发生率以及重复手术的必要性。结果:在所有术后对照中,后赤道性近视和y型分裂均显著降低了远斜角和近斜角及会聚过度,在4个月的随访中,两组间无显著差异(Levene方差齐性检验[远角p = 0.151;近角p = 0.114])。术中并发症的发生率以及矫正过度和矫正不足的再手术需要略低于y型切口。结论:赤道后肌固定术和内直肌y裂术是治疗会聚过度的合适手术方法。由于没有后赤道固定,y -劈裂术似乎更安全,更容易学习,并发症更少。但是,修改可能会比较困难,在有关y型分离技术的信息丢失的情况下,应该考虑到这一点,并且应该始终提供程序的书面文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Two Surgical Methods for the Treatment of Convergence Excess: Y-Split and Retro-equatorial Myopexy of the Medial Rectus Muscle.

Background: In addition to the bimedial recession of the rectus muscle, two surgical procedures are available to reduce torque: retro-equatorial myopexy (Cüppers-Fadenoperation) and the Y-split of the medial rectus muscle. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the latter two surgical techniques.

Methods: Data from 113 consecutive patients who presented for surgical treatment of convergence excess at the University Hospital of Würzburg between October 2006 and October 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In 2006 - 2014. All patients underwent retro-equatorial myopexy, whereas from 2015 onwards, Y-splitting was the treatment of choice. Orthoptic examinations were performed preoperatively, on the first postoperative day, four months postoperatively and in the longer postoperative course - always with full correction of hyperopia as measured in cycloplegia. The distance and near squint angles in the alternating cover test, the convergence excess and the complication rate as well as the need for repeat surgery were measured.

Results: Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting significantly reduced the far and near strabismus angles and convergence excess in all postoperative controls, with no significant difference between the two groups at the four-month follow-up (Levene's variance homogeneity test [far angle p = 0.151; near angle p = 0.114]). The incidence of intraoperative complications and the need for reoperation for over- and undercorrection were slightly lower with the Y-split.

Conclusion: Both retro-equatorial myopexy and Y-splitting of the medial rectus muscle are suitable surgical procedures for the treatment of convergence excess. Y-splitting appears to be safer intraoperatively and easier to learn, due to the absence of retro-equatorial fixation, which is associated with fewer complications. However, revision may be more difficult, this should be considered in the event of loss of information regarding the Y-splitting technique and written documentation of the procedure should always be provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信