弥合技术与护理教育之间的差距:评估学生对Blackboard整合的看法。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_310_24
Petelyne P Pangket, Evalynn M Rondilla, Jerold C Alcantara, Dolores I Cabansag, Hamdan Mohammad Albaqawi, Sarah Nawasreh, Lea L Dando, Jonalee M Valdez, Jane Rachelle D Baroquillo, Laila Lafi Alharbi, Latifa Awad Alshammari
{"title":"弥合技术与护理教育之间的差距:评估学生对Blackboard整合的看法。","authors":"Petelyne P Pangket, Evalynn M Rondilla, Jerold C Alcantara, Dolores I Cabansag, Hamdan Mohammad Albaqawi, Sarah Nawasreh, Lea L Dando, Jonalee M Valdez, Jane Rachelle D Baroquillo, Laila Lafi Alharbi, Latifa Awad Alshammari","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_310_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of Blackboard as a learning management system (LMS) has transformed nursing education globally by providing flexibility, increasing student involvement, and improving learning outcomes. This study aimed to assess nursing students' perceptions of Blackboard in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study used the descriptive correlational method as its research design, which involved 264 nursing students in their second, third, and fourth years, taken as a sample through convenience sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that in nursing education, Blackboard is seen as a valuable resource because it can always be reached and is user-friendly. This indicated that 80.3% of the students were between the ages of 35 and 50 years, while 87.9% were female. Most participants (57.1%) used tablets or iPads to access Blackboard. The median for \"Technology Acceptance\" was 4, with a standard deviation of 0.86, which means that there were quite different answers to this question. \"Instruction Method in Nursing Courses\" had a median score of 5 without any standard deviation, meaning all participants found it effective unanimously. On average, people rated facilities, accessibility, and time spent at 4 points, with very little response variation (0.05). Chi-square tests supported a significant relationship between technology acceptance and age, gender, and device used to access Blackboard, but not location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the significance of digital justice in e-learning and emphasizes the need for continuous feedback mechanisms that can pinpoint areas of improvement to guarantee and foster students' optimal learning experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the gap between technology and nursing education: Assessing student perspectives on Blackboard integration.\",\"authors\":\"Petelyne P Pangket, Evalynn M Rondilla, Jerold C Alcantara, Dolores I Cabansag, Hamdan Mohammad Albaqawi, Sarah Nawasreh, Lea L Dando, Jonalee M Valdez, Jane Rachelle D Baroquillo, Laila Lafi Alharbi, Latifa Awad Alshammari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_310_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of Blackboard as a learning management system (LMS) has transformed nursing education globally by providing flexibility, increasing student involvement, and improving learning outcomes. This study aimed to assess nursing students' perceptions of Blackboard in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study used the descriptive correlational method as its research design, which involved 264 nursing students in their second, third, and fourth years, taken as a sample through convenience sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that in nursing education, Blackboard is seen as a valuable resource because it can always be reached and is user-friendly. This indicated that 80.3% of the students were between the ages of 35 and 50 years, while 87.9% were female. Most participants (57.1%) used tablets or iPads to access Blackboard. The median for \\\"Technology Acceptance\\\" was 4, with a standard deviation of 0.86, which means that there were quite different answers to this question. \\\"Instruction Method in Nursing Courses\\\" had a median score of 5 without any standard deviation, meaning all participants found it effective unanimously. On average, people rated facilities, accessibility, and time spent at 4 points, with very little response variation (0.05). Chi-square tests supported a significant relationship between technology acceptance and age, gender, and device used to access Blackboard, but not location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the significance of digital justice in e-learning and emphasizes the need for continuous feedback mechanisms that can pinpoint areas of improvement to guarantee and foster students' optimal learning experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_310_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_310_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Blackboard作为一种学习管理系统(LMS)的使用,通过提供灵活性、提高学生参与度和改善学习成果,改变了全球护理教育。本研究旨在评估沙特护生对Blackboard的认知。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性相关法作为研究设计,选取264名二、三、四年级护生,采用方便抽样法作为样本。结果:在护理教育中,Blackboard被认为是一个有价值的资源,因为它可以随时访问,并且用户友好。这表明80.3%的学生年龄在35岁至50岁之间,而87.9%的学生是女性。大多数参与者(57.1%)使用平板电脑或ipad访问Blackboard。“Technology Acceptance”的中位数为4,标准差为0.86,这意味着这个问题的答案非常不同。“护理课程教学方法”的中位数得分为5分,没有任何标准差,这意味着所有参与者都一致认为它有效。人们对设施、可达性和花费时间的平均评分为4分,反应差异很小(0.05)。卡方检验支持技术接受程度与年龄、性别和访问Blackboard的设备之间存在显著关系,但与位置无关。结论:本研究证明了数字公平在电子学习中的重要性,并强调需要持续的反馈机制来确定改进的领域,以保证和促进学生的最佳学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the gap between technology and nursing education: Assessing student perspectives on Blackboard integration.

Background: The use of Blackboard as a learning management system (LMS) has transformed nursing education globally by providing flexibility, increasing student involvement, and improving learning outcomes. This study aimed to assess nursing students' perceptions of Blackboard in Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods: The study used the descriptive correlational method as its research design, which involved 264 nursing students in their second, third, and fourth years, taken as a sample through convenience sampling.

Results: The study showed that in nursing education, Blackboard is seen as a valuable resource because it can always be reached and is user-friendly. This indicated that 80.3% of the students were between the ages of 35 and 50 years, while 87.9% were female. Most participants (57.1%) used tablets or iPads to access Blackboard. The median for "Technology Acceptance" was 4, with a standard deviation of 0.86, which means that there were quite different answers to this question. "Instruction Method in Nursing Courses" had a median score of 5 without any standard deviation, meaning all participants found it effective unanimously. On average, people rated facilities, accessibility, and time spent at 4 points, with very little response variation (0.05). Chi-square tests supported a significant relationship between technology acceptance and age, gender, and device used to access Blackboard, but not location.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significance of digital justice in e-learning and emphasizes the need for continuous feedback mechanisms that can pinpoint areas of improvement to guarantee and foster students' optimal learning experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信