{"title":"是什么让一个人能够包容他人?个人包容性量表的编制。","authors":"Cecily Josten, Grace Lordan","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the <i>Individual Inclusiveness Inventory</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, <i>Challenge and Openness</i>, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that <i>Challenge and Openness</i> was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i> was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. <i>Challenge and Openness</i> appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1473120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory.\",\"authors\":\"Cecily Josten, Grace Lordan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the <i>Individual Inclusiveness Inventory</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, <i>Challenge and Openness</i>, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that <i>Challenge and Openness</i> was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i> was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. <i>Challenge and Openness</i> appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1473120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory.
Introduction: Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the Individual Inclusiveness Inventory.
Methods: Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.
Results: The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, Belonging and Uniqueness, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, Challenge and Openness, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that Challenge and Openness was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. Belonging and Uniqueness was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.
Discussion: Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. Challenge and Openness appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. Belonging and Uniqueness, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.