是什么让一个人能够包容他人?个人包容性量表的编制。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120
Cecily Josten, Grace Lordan
{"title":"是什么让一个人能够包容他人?个人包容性量表的编制。","authors":"Cecily Josten, Grace Lordan","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the <i>Individual Inclusiveness Inventory</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, <i>Challenge and Openness</i>, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that <i>Challenge and Openness</i> was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i> was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. <i>Challenge and Openness</i> appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1473120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory.\",\"authors\":\"Cecily Josten, Grace Lordan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the <i>Individual Inclusiveness Inventory</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, <i>Challenge and Openness</i>, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that <i>Challenge and Openness</i> was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i> was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. <i>Challenge and Openness</i> appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. <i>Belonging and Uniqueness</i>, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1473120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今日益多样化的员工队伍中,协作和包容是成功工作成果的关键驱动因素。然而,尽管人们对组织包容性进行了广泛的研究,但人们对个人如何在工作中包容他人却知之甚少。我们将包容性个人定义为积极包容团队中其他人,重视思想和背景的多样性,并促进团队绩效和生产力的人。为了解决这一差距,我们开发并验证了一种新的衡量标准:个人包容性量表。方法:采用演绎和归纳相结合的方法,在回顾包容性文献和对14位多样性和包容性专家进行定性访谈的基础上生成量表项目。我们进行了探索性因素分析(EFA),随后进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)对英国两个工作专业人员样本的回应。结果:分析揭示了一个双因素解决方案。第一个因素,归属感和独特性,体现了在重视个人独特性的同时培养归属感的能力。第二个因素,挑战和开放,反映了对不同观点的开放态度,以及参与和接受建设性挑战的意愿。这两个因素均表现出良好的可靠性。预测效度分析显示,挑战和开放与所有测量的工作成果(包括收入)呈正相关。归属感和独特性与管理的人数、感知的资历和工作幸福感呈正相关。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,个人包容性是多维的,对工作结果有不同的预测。挑战和开放似乎与生产力相关的结果密切相关,可能是因为它们与创新和竞争力有关。归属感和独特性虽然对生产力的预测能力较弱,但对团队凝聚力和幸福感等关系结果很重要。这些见解对人才发展和包容性领导力培训具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory.

Introduction: Collaboration and inclusion are key drivers of successful work outcomes in today's increasingly diverse workforce. Yet, while organizational inclusion has been widely studied, less is known about what makes an individual inclusive of others at work. We define an inclusive individual as someone who actively includes others in a group, values diversity of thought and background, and fosters group performance and productivity. To address this gap, we develop and validate a new measure: the Individual Inclusiveness Inventory.

Methods: Using a combined deductive and inductive approach, we generated scale items based on a review of the inclusion literature and qualitative interviews with 14 diversity and inclusion experts. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from two samples of working professionals in the UK.

Results: The analyses revealed a two-factor solution. The first factor, Belonging and Uniqueness, captures the ability to foster a sense of belonging while valuing individuals' distinctiveness. The second factor, Challenge and Openness, reflects openness to diverse perspectives and willingness to engage in and accept constructive challenge. Both factors demonstrated good reliability. Predictive validity analyses showed that Challenge and Openness was positively associated with all measured work outcomes, including income. Belonging and Uniqueness was positively associated with the number of people managed, perceived seniority, and happiness at work.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that individual inclusiveness is multi-dimensional and differentially predictive of work outcomes. Challenge and Openness appears closely linked to productivityrelated outcomes, likely due to its association with innovation and competitiveness. Belonging and Uniqueness, while less predictive of productivity, is important for relational outcomes such as team cohesion and well-being. These insights have implications for talent development and inclusive leadership training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信