智障儿童解决问题能力学习模式的发展。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_13_25
Thiyaporn Kantathanawat, Asamaporn Treearpornwong, Mai Charoentham
{"title":"智障儿童解决问题能力学习模式的发展。","authors":"Thiyaporn Kantathanawat, Asamaporn Treearpornwong, Mai Charoentham","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_13_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing problem-solving abilities (PSA) in children with intellectual disabilities is critical for fostering independence and adaptive skills. The initial PCTL- model integrated phenomenon-based learning (PhBL), cognitive coaching (CC), task analysis (TA), and optimal learning environments (LE) to address the unique educational needs of this population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study employed a two-phase approach. In phase 1, a conceptual framework for the PCTL model was synthesized through a systematic review of existing literature and an analysis of the teaching contexts specific to children with intellectual disabilities. In phase 2, the model was evaluated by eight educational experts specializing in curriculum design, assessment, special education, and technology. Quantitative ratings were collected to assess feasibility, utility, propriety, and accuracy, with an overall mean of 4.40 (SD = 0.51), indicating high appropriateness. Qualitative feedback was analyzed to refine the model, which was subsequently expanded and became the PCTL + PSA model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel validated the PCTL model, emphasizing its comprehensive structure and practical applicability. The model after expert assessment and input was expanded to five key components for developing PSA. Moreover, PSA is identified as being involved in identifying problems, subdividing problems, analyzing and proposing solutions, evaluating methods, and assessing outcomes. Across all evaluation dimensions, the PCTL + PSA model achieved high scores, with the utility dimension rated the highest (mean = 4.69, SD = 0.49, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The findings highlighted the importance of fostering a supportive LE-physically, psychologically, socially, and informationally-to maximize the model's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a validated and practical framework tailored to enhance problem-solving skills in children with intellectual disabilities. The final PCTL + PSA model contributes to inclusive education by addressing the unique learning needs of this population and providing actionable strategies for educators to improve classroom practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a problem-solving ability learning model for children with intellectual disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Thiyaporn Kantathanawat, Asamaporn Treearpornwong, Mai Charoentham\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_13_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing problem-solving abilities (PSA) in children with intellectual disabilities is critical for fostering independence and adaptive skills. The initial PCTL- model integrated phenomenon-based learning (PhBL), cognitive coaching (CC), task analysis (TA), and optimal learning environments (LE) to address the unique educational needs of this population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study employed a two-phase approach. In phase 1, a conceptual framework for the PCTL model was synthesized through a systematic review of existing literature and an analysis of the teaching contexts specific to children with intellectual disabilities. In phase 2, the model was evaluated by eight educational experts specializing in curriculum design, assessment, special education, and technology. Quantitative ratings were collected to assess feasibility, utility, propriety, and accuracy, with an overall mean of 4.40 (SD = 0.51), indicating high appropriateness. Qualitative feedback was analyzed to refine the model, which was subsequently expanded and became the PCTL + PSA model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel validated the PCTL model, emphasizing its comprehensive structure and practical applicability. The model after expert assessment and input was expanded to five key components for developing PSA. Moreover, PSA is identified as being involved in identifying problems, subdividing problems, analyzing and proposing solutions, evaluating methods, and assessing outcomes. Across all evaluation dimensions, the PCTL + PSA model achieved high scores, with the utility dimension rated the highest (mean = 4.69, SD = 0.49, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The findings highlighted the importance of fostering a supportive LE-physically, psychologically, socially, and informationally-to maximize the model's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a validated and practical framework tailored to enhance problem-solving skills in children with intellectual disabilities. The final PCTL + PSA model contributes to inclusive education by addressing the unique learning needs of this population and providing actionable strategies for educators to improve classroom practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_13_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_13_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提高智障儿童的问题解决能力(PSA)对于培养独立性和适应能力至关重要。最初的PCTL模型整合了基于现象的学习(PhBL)、认知指导(CC)、任务分析(TA)和最佳学习环境(LE),以满足这一群体的独特教育需求。材料和方法:本研究采用两阶段方法。在第一阶段,通过对现有文献的系统回顾和对智障儿童特定教学环境的分析,综合了PCTL模型的概念框架。在第二阶段,该模型由8位专门从事课程设计、评估、特殊教育和技术的教育专家进行评估。收集定量评分来评估可行性、效用、适当性和准确性,总体平均值为4.40 (SD = 0.51),表明高度适当。定性反馈分析,完善模型,随后扩大,成为PCTL + PSA模型。结果:专家组对PCTL模型进行了验证,强调了其结构的综合性和实用性。经过专家评估和输入后的模型扩展为开发PSA的五个关键组成部分。此外,PSA被认为参与识别问题、细分问题、分析和提出解决方案、评估方法和评估结果。在所有评价维度中,PCTL + PSA模型得分较高,其中效用维度得分最高(mean = 4.69, SD = 0.49, P < 0.05)。研究结果强调了在生理上、心理上、社会上和信息上培养支持性le的重要性,以最大限度地提高模型的有效性。结论:本研究引入了一个有效的、实用的框架,以提高智障儿童解决问题的能力。最终的PCTL + PSA模式通过解决这一群体独特的学习需求,并为教育工作者提供改进课堂实践的可行策略,为全纳教育做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a problem-solving ability learning model for children with intellectual disabilities.

Background: Enhancing problem-solving abilities (PSA) in children with intellectual disabilities is critical for fostering independence and adaptive skills. The initial PCTL- model integrated phenomenon-based learning (PhBL), cognitive coaching (CC), task analysis (TA), and optimal learning environments (LE) to address the unique educational needs of this population.

Material and methods: The study employed a two-phase approach. In phase 1, a conceptual framework for the PCTL model was synthesized through a systematic review of existing literature and an analysis of the teaching contexts specific to children with intellectual disabilities. In phase 2, the model was evaluated by eight educational experts specializing in curriculum design, assessment, special education, and technology. Quantitative ratings were collected to assess feasibility, utility, propriety, and accuracy, with an overall mean of 4.40 (SD = 0.51), indicating high appropriateness. Qualitative feedback was analyzed to refine the model, which was subsequently expanded and became the PCTL + PSA model.

Results: The expert panel validated the PCTL model, emphasizing its comprehensive structure and practical applicability. The model after expert assessment and input was expanded to five key components for developing PSA. Moreover, PSA is identified as being involved in identifying problems, subdividing problems, analyzing and proposing solutions, evaluating methods, and assessing outcomes. Across all evaluation dimensions, the PCTL + PSA model achieved high scores, with the utility dimension rated the highest (mean = 4.69, SD = 0.49, P < 0.05). The findings highlighted the importance of fostering a supportive LE-physically, psychologically, socially, and informationally-to maximize the model's effectiveness.

Conclusion: This study introduces a validated and practical framework tailored to enhance problem-solving skills in children with intellectual disabilities. The final PCTL + PSA model contributes to inclusive education by addressing the unique learning needs of this population and providing actionable strategies for educators to improve classroom practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信