澳大利亚东海岸白鲨(Carcharodon carcharias)、牛鲨(Carcharhinus leucas)和虎鲨(Galeocerdo cuvier)口腔中的抗微生物病原体。

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Jessica McIntosh, Andrew Greenhill, Paul Butcher, Meagan Dewar
{"title":"澳大利亚东海岸白鲨(Carcharodon carcharias)、牛鲨(Carcharhinus leucas)和虎鲨(Galeocerdo cuvier)口腔中的抗微生物病原体。","authors":"Jessica McIntosh, Andrew Greenhill, Paul Butcher, Meagan Dewar","doi":"10.1007/s00284-025-04272-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Australia has one of the highest incidences of shark bites worldwide. Previous research on sharks has detected antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria in the oral cavity, however, no such research has been conducted on species found in Australasian waters. In this study, 197 bacterial isolates were obtained from oral swabs taken from 153 sharks, including white (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) and bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) caught on the east coast of Australia between May 2018 and April 2022. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF, and a disc diffusion assay was used to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of 72 isolates considered potential pathogens, including members of the genera Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Psychrobacter. Resistance to one or more antibiotics was common, with 60%, 73%, and 74% of isolates from white, tiger and bull sharks resistant to one or more antibiotics, respectively. This research provides insights into which antibiotics are most suitable for treating shark bite wounds in eastern Australia, and possibly more broadly, to prevent infection. This study identified that over 51% of pathogens in the oral cavity of Australian sharks are resistant to one or more antibiotics, with most pathogens being resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. This research provides important information for medical professionals when it comes to treaty wounds inflicted by shark bites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 7","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens in the Oral Cavity of White (Carcharodon carcharias), Bull (Carcharhinus leucas) and Tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) Sharks from the East Coast of Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica McIntosh, Andrew Greenhill, Paul Butcher, Meagan Dewar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00284-025-04272-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Australia has one of the highest incidences of shark bites worldwide. Previous research on sharks has detected antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria in the oral cavity, however, no such research has been conducted on species found in Australasian waters. In this study, 197 bacterial isolates were obtained from oral swabs taken from 153 sharks, including white (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) and bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) caught on the east coast of Australia between May 2018 and April 2022. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF, and a disc diffusion assay was used to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of 72 isolates considered potential pathogens, including members of the genera Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Psychrobacter. Resistance to one or more antibiotics was common, with 60%, 73%, and 74% of isolates from white, tiger and bull sharks resistant to one or more antibiotics, respectively. This research provides insights into which antibiotics are most suitable for treating shark bite wounds in eastern Australia, and possibly more broadly, to prevent infection. This study identified that over 51% of pathogens in the oral cavity of Australian sharks are resistant to one or more antibiotics, with most pathogens being resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. This research provides important information for medical professionals when it comes to treaty wounds inflicted by shark bites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"82 7\",\"pages\":\"300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04272-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04272-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚是世界上鲨鱼咬伤发生率最高的国家之一。以前对鲨鱼的研究已经在口腔中发现了耐抗生素的致病菌,然而,在澳大拉西亚水域发现的物种中没有进行过这样的研究。在这项研究中,从2018年5月至2022年4月在澳大利亚东海岸捕获的153条鲨鱼的口腔样本中分离出197种细菌,包括白鲨(Carcharodon carcharias)、虎鲨(Galeocerdo cuvier)和牛鲨(Carcharhinus leucas)。采用MALDI-TOF对分离株进行鉴定,并采用圆盘扩散法测定72株被认为是潜在病原体的分离株的抗生素敏感性,包括假单胞菌属、弧菌属、气单胞菌属、肠杆菌属、克雷伯菌属和冷杆菌属。对一种或多种抗生素耐药很常见,分别有60%、73%和74%的白鲨、虎鲨和牛鲨分离株对一种或多种抗生素耐药。这项研究提供了最适合治疗澳大利亚东部鲨鱼咬伤的抗生素,以及可能更广泛地预防感染的见解。这项研究发现,澳大利亚鲨鱼口腔中超过51%的病原体对一种或多种抗生素具有耐药性,其中大多数病原体对常用处方抗生素具有耐药性。当涉及到鲨鱼咬伤造成的条约伤口时,这项研究为医疗专业人员提供了重要的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens in the Oral Cavity of White (Carcharodon carcharias), Bull (Carcharhinus leucas) and Tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) Sharks from the East Coast of Australia.

Australia has one of the highest incidences of shark bites worldwide. Previous research on sharks has detected antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria in the oral cavity, however, no such research has been conducted on species found in Australasian waters. In this study, 197 bacterial isolates were obtained from oral swabs taken from 153 sharks, including white (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) and bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) caught on the east coast of Australia between May 2018 and April 2022. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF, and a disc diffusion assay was used to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of 72 isolates considered potential pathogens, including members of the genera Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Psychrobacter. Resistance to one or more antibiotics was common, with 60%, 73%, and 74% of isolates from white, tiger and bull sharks resistant to one or more antibiotics, respectively. This research provides insights into which antibiotics are most suitable for treating shark bite wounds in eastern Australia, and possibly more broadly, to prevent infection. This study identified that over 51% of pathogens in the oral cavity of Australian sharks are resistant to one or more antibiotics, with most pathogens being resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. This research provides important information for medical professionals when it comes to treaty wounds inflicted by shark bites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Microbiology
Current Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment. Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信