LABA/LAMA固定剂量联合吸入器在COPD患者中的使用、有效性和安全性

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sara Lopes, Maria Lucia Marino, Filomena Fortinguerra, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Francesco Trotta
{"title":"LABA/LAMA固定剂量联合吸入器在COPD患者中的使用、有效性和安全性","authors":"Sara Lopes, Maria Lucia Marino, Filomena Fortinguerra, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Francesco Trotta","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Italy, long-acting bronchodilator (LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combinations are widely used for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These medications are available in various inhaler devices, but clinical guidelines do not recommend a specific device, leaving the choice to clinicians based on patient needs. To date, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of different LABA/LAMA devices. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of LABA/LAMA inhaler devices in COPD patients in the Lazio region, representing about 10% of Italy's population. Patients aged 45 and older who initiated LABA/LAMA treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were included. The devices analyzed were dry powder inhalers (DPI) capsule/strip (DPI-<i>t</i>, reference group), DPI with a reservoir (DPI-r), and soft mist inhalers (SMI). The study identified 12,346 eligible patients, with over 80% having prior COPD drug use. Of these, 53.2% used DPI-<i>t</i>, 19.7% DPI-r, and 27.1% SMI. No significant differences in severe exacerbations, mortality, pneumonia, or cerebro-cardiovascular events were observed among the devices. Hazard ratios for key outcomes (e.g., severe exacerbations, mortality) showed overlapping confidence intervals across device types, suggesting no device offered superior effectiveness or safety. This is the first study to assess LABA/LAMA device use in real-world clinical practice for COPD. Findings suggest therapeutic equivalence among devices, supporting flexibility in prescribing. Further research is needed to inform cost-effective prescribing policies for LABA/LAMA therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2506548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inhaler Devices for LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Lopes, Maria Lucia Marino, Filomena Fortinguerra, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Francesco Trotta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Italy, long-acting bronchodilator (LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combinations are widely used for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These medications are available in various inhaler devices, but clinical guidelines do not recommend a specific device, leaving the choice to clinicians based on patient needs. To date, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of different LABA/LAMA devices. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of LABA/LAMA inhaler devices in COPD patients in the Lazio region, representing about 10% of Italy's population. Patients aged 45 and older who initiated LABA/LAMA treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were included. The devices analyzed were dry powder inhalers (DPI) capsule/strip (DPI-<i>t</i>, reference group), DPI with a reservoir (DPI-r), and soft mist inhalers (SMI). The study identified 12,346 eligible patients, with over 80% having prior COPD drug use. Of these, 53.2% used DPI-<i>t</i>, 19.7% DPI-r, and 27.1% SMI. No significant differences in severe exacerbations, mortality, pneumonia, or cerebro-cardiovascular events were observed among the devices. Hazard ratios for key outcomes (e.g., severe exacerbations, mortality) showed overlapping confidence intervals across device types, suggesting no device offered superior effectiveness or safety. This is the first study to assess LABA/LAMA device use in real-world clinical practice for COPD. Findings suggest therapeutic equivalence among devices, supporting flexibility in prescribing. Further research is needed to inform cost-effective prescribing policies for LABA/LAMA therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"2506548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在意大利,长效支气管扩张剂(LABA/LAMA)固定剂量组合广泛用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。这些药物可在各种吸入器装置中使用,但临床指南不推荐特定的装置,让临床医生根据患者的需要进行选择。到目前为止,还没有研究直接比较不同LABA/LAMA装置的有效性和安全性。这项回顾性观察性研究评估了LABA/LAMA吸入器在拉齐奥地区COPD患者中的使用、有效性和安全性,该地区约占意大利人口的10%。纳入了2017年1月至2019年12月期间开始LABA/LAMA治疗的45岁及以上患者。所分析的设备包括干粉吸入器(DPI)胶囊/条(DPI-t,参照组)、带储液器的DPI (DPI-r)和软雾吸入器(SMI)。该研究确定了12346名符合条件的患者,其中80%以上有COPD药物使用史。其中,53.2%使用DPI-t, 19.7%使用DPI-r, 27.1%使用SMI。两种装置在严重恶化、死亡率、肺炎或脑血管事件方面未观察到显著差异。关键结果(如严重恶化、死亡率)的风险比在不同设备类型之间显示重叠的置信区间,表明没有设备具有更好的有效性或安全性。这是第一个评估LABA/LAMA设备在COPD临床实践中的应用的研究。研究结果表明,设备之间的治疗等效,支持处方的灵活性。需要进一步的研究来为具有成本效益的LABA/LAMA治疗处方政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inhaler Devices for LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD.

In Italy, long-acting bronchodilator (LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combinations are widely used for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These medications are available in various inhaler devices, but clinical guidelines do not recommend a specific device, leaving the choice to clinicians based on patient needs. To date, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of different LABA/LAMA devices. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of LABA/LAMA inhaler devices in COPD patients in the Lazio region, representing about 10% of Italy's population. Patients aged 45 and older who initiated LABA/LAMA treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were included. The devices analyzed were dry powder inhalers (DPI) capsule/strip (DPI-t, reference group), DPI with a reservoir (DPI-r), and soft mist inhalers (SMI). The study identified 12,346 eligible patients, with over 80% having prior COPD drug use. Of these, 53.2% used DPI-t, 19.7% DPI-r, and 27.1% SMI. No significant differences in severe exacerbations, mortality, pneumonia, or cerebro-cardiovascular events were observed among the devices. Hazard ratios for key outcomes (e.g., severe exacerbations, mortality) showed overlapping confidence intervals across device types, suggesting no device offered superior effectiveness or safety. This is the first study to assess LABA/LAMA device use in real-world clinical practice for COPD. Findings suggest therapeutic equivalence among devices, supporting flexibility in prescribing. Further research is needed to inform cost-effective prescribing policies for LABA/LAMA therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信