前列腺外展对前列腺癌伴精囊浸润患者预后的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/EDGZ4295
Yoshinori Yanai, Takeo Kosaka, Shuji Mikami, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeshi Masuda, Mototsugu Oya
{"title":"前列腺外展对前列腺癌伴精囊浸润患者预后的影响。","authors":"Yoshinori Yanai, Takeo Kosaka, Shuji Mikami, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeshi Masuda, Mototsugu Oya","doi":"10.62347/EDGZ4295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) are unfavorable factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy; however, some patients with SVI survive for a long duration without experiencing BCR after prostatectomy in absence of adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the heterogeneity of locally advanced prostate cancers to better understand prognosis in patients with SVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with SVI who underwent radical prostatectomy at two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables as predictors of BCR. We also used Kaplan-Meier and competing risk regression analysis to assess the cumulative incidence and risk of BCR. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, 55 patients with SVI were enrolled in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCR occurred in 31 of these patients (56.3%). We found that Grade group and positive EPE were predictors of BCR in patients with SVI (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively). Using the multivariate model, EPE was significantly associated with BCR in patients with SVI (hazard ratio: 5.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-23.405; <i>P</i> = 0.012). Patients who were negative for EPE had significantly lower BCR rates (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the patients with SVI tumors, prognosis might be different depending on presence or absence of EPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"13 2","pages":"186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic impact of extraprostatic extension on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Yanai, Takeo Kosaka, Shuji Mikami, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeshi Masuda, Mototsugu Oya\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/EDGZ4295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) are unfavorable factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy; however, some patients with SVI survive for a long duration without experiencing BCR after prostatectomy in absence of adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the heterogeneity of locally advanced prostate cancers to better understand prognosis in patients with SVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with SVI who underwent radical prostatectomy at two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables as predictors of BCR. We also used Kaplan-Meier and competing risk regression analysis to assess the cumulative incidence and risk of BCR. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, 55 patients with SVI were enrolled in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCR occurred in 31 of these patients (56.3%). We found that Grade group and positive EPE were predictors of BCR in patients with SVI (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively). Using the multivariate model, EPE was significantly associated with BCR in patients with SVI (hazard ratio: 5.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-23.405; <i>P</i> = 0.012). Patients who were negative for EPE had significantly lower BCR rates (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the patients with SVI tumors, prognosis might be different depending on presence or absence of EPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"186-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/EDGZ4295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/EDGZ4295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:前列腺外展(EPE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)是根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCR)的不利因素;然而,在没有辅助治疗的情况下,一些SVI患者在前列腺切除术后存活了很长时间而没有发生BCR。本研究旨在阐明局部晚期前列腺癌的异质性,以更好地了解SVI患者的预后。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了在两家机构接受根治性前列腺切除术的120例SVI患者的医疗记录。采用多因素logistic回归评估术前临床和术后病理变量作为BCR的预测因子。我们还使用Kaplan-Meier和竞争风险回归分析来评估BCR的累积发病率和风险。在排除接受新辅助或辅助治疗的患者后,55例SVI患者入组本研究。结果:31例患者发生BCR(56.3%)。我们发现分级组和EPE阳性是SVI患者BCR的预测因子(分别P < 0.001和P = 0.002)。使用多变量模型,SVI患者EPE与BCR显著相关(风险比:5.402;95%置信区间为1.247-23.405;P = 0.012)。EPE阴性患者的BCR率显著降低(P = 0.002)。结论:在SVI肿瘤患者中,EPE是否存在可能导致预后不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic impact of extraprostatic extension on prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion.

Objectives: Extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) are unfavorable factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy; however, some patients with SVI survive for a long duration without experiencing BCR after prostatectomy in absence of adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the heterogeneity of locally advanced prostate cancers to better understand prognosis in patients with SVI.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with SVI who underwent radical prostatectomy at two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables as predictors of BCR. We also used Kaplan-Meier and competing risk regression analysis to assess the cumulative incidence and risk of BCR. After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, 55 patients with SVI were enrolled in this study.

Results: BCR occurred in 31 of these patients (56.3%). We found that Grade group and positive EPE were predictors of BCR in patients with SVI (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Using the multivariate model, EPE was significantly associated with BCR in patients with SVI (hazard ratio: 5.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-23.405; P = 0.012). Patients who were negative for EPE had significantly lower BCR rates (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Among the patients with SVI tumors, prognosis might be different depending on presence or absence of EPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信