口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘状态对生存结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli
{"title":"口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘状态对生存结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"45 Suppl. 1","pages":"S2-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of surgical margins status on survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"45 Suppl. 1\",\"pages\":\"S2-S14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是分析手术切缘对口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)患者生存结果的影响。方法:计算合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(CI),以确定阳性和接近的切度对总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)的影响。结果:共纳入14项研究,纳入4839例患者(其中男性3837例,占79.3%),中位年龄59岁。阳性切缘发生率为9.1%,近切缘发生率为27.3%。手术切缘阳性患者的估计总hr为2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584;p = 0.003), 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608;p < 0.001), DFS为2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468;p = 0.014)。对于切缘较近的患者,hr为1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866;p = 0.024), OS为1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462;p = 0.078),为1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974;p = 0.658)。结论:手术切缘阳性是OCSCC的重要预后因素。需要进一步的研究来更好地定义接近边际的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of surgical margins status on survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods: Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).

Results: A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.

Conclusions: Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini. It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.). The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief. Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信