Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli
{"title":"口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘状态对生存结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"45 Suppl. 1","pages":"S2-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of surgical margins status on survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Bellini, Gian Marco Pace, Filippo Marchi, Alberto Paderno, Camilla Zimello, Alessia Pennacchi, Giuseppe Mercante, Giorgio Peretti, Giuseppe Spriano, Andrea Iandelli\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"45 Suppl. 1\",\"pages\":\"S2-S14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of surgical margins status on survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of surgical margins on survival outcomes for patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
Methods: Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of positive and close margins on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).
Results: A total of 14 studies enrolling 4839 patients (of whom 3837 males, or 79.3%), with a median age of 59 years, were included. The incidence of positive margins was 9.1%, while that of close margins was 27.3%. The estimated pooled HRs for patients with positive surgical margins were 2.265 (95% CI: 1.431-3.584; p = 0.003) for OS, 2.076 (95% CI: 1.652-2.608; p < 0.001) for DFS, and 2.163 (95% CI: 1.349-3.468; p = 0.014) for DSS. For patients with close margins, the HRs were 1.409 (95% CI: 1.064-1.866; p = 0.024) for OS, 1.775 (95% CI: 0.910-3.462; p = 0.078) for DFS, and 1.123 (95% CI: 0.425-2.974; p = 0.658) for DSS.
Conclusions: Positive surgical margins are a significant prognostic factor in OCSCC. Further studies are required to better define the impact of close margins.
期刊介绍:
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini.
It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.).
The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief.
Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.