Francesco Mattioli, Giovanni Succo, Federica Piazza, Carola Gillone, Giuseppe Ferulli, Chiara Alberti, Cinzia Del Giovane, Silvia Sapino, Giulio Pagliuca, Gabriele Molteni, Erika Crosetti
{"title":"下咽手术切除边缘的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Francesco Mattioli, Giovanni Succo, Federica Piazza, Carola Gillone, Giuseppe Ferulli, Chiara Alberti, Cinzia Del Giovane, Silvia Sapino, Giulio Pagliuca, Gabriele Molteni, Erika Crosetti","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to frequently late-stage presentation and intrinsic anatomical complexity. Surgery remains a key treatment, and resection margins are crucial for local control and survival. However, achieving adequate margins is challenging due to submucosal tumour spread and common \"skip lesions\". This systematic review examines the impact of positive and close margins on oncological outcomes and their role in treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"45 Suppl. 1","pages":"S99-S108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of resection margins in hypopharyngeal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Mattioli, Giovanni Succo, Federica Piazza, Carola Gillone, Giuseppe Ferulli, Chiara Alberti, Cinzia Del Giovane, Silvia Sapino, Giulio Pagliuca, Gabriele Molteni, Erika Crosetti\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to frequently late-stage presentation and intrinsic anatomical complexity. Surgery remains a key treatment, and resection margins are crucial for local control and survival. However, achieving adequate margins is challenging due to submucosal tumour spread and common \\\"skip lesions\\\". This systematic review examines the impact of positive and close margins on oncological outcomes and their role in treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"45 Suppl. 1\",\"pages\":\"S99-S108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:下咽鳞状细胞癌是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,由于其经常出现在晚期和内在的解剖复杂性,预后差。手术仍然是关键的治疗方法,切除边缘对局部控制和生存至关重要。然而,由于粘膜下肿瘤的扩散和常见的“跳跃性病变”,获得足够的切缘是具有挑战性的。本系统综述检查了阳性和闭合边缘对肿瘤结果的影响及其在治疗计划中的作用。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们纳入了接受手术治疗的成人下咽癌患者的研究,包括经口激光显微手术、经口机器人手术和开放切除术。主要终点是总生存期(OS);次要结局包括无病生存期(DFS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和局部控制。系统检索2000 - 2024年PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,根据严格的纳入标准筛选符合条件的研究。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计合并风险比(HR)和相对95%置信区间(CI)。结果:从最初的2681篇文章中,157篇全文研究被审查,其中7篇符合纳入标准。分析了619例患者(平均年龄60.9岁)的数据,均来自回顾性研究。其中17%接受了新辅助化疗,94%因切缘阳性或其他不良特征接受了辅助治疗。一项荟萃分析发现,与阴性边缘相比,阳性边缘或闭合边缘对OS、DSS或DFS没有统计学上显著的影响。OS的HR为1.78 (95%CI: 0.79 ~ 4.04, p = 0.17), DFS的HR为1.43 (95%CI: 0.82 ~ 2.49, p = 0.21), DSS的HR为1.31 (95%CI: 0.42 ~ 4.05, p = 0.42)。结论:本综述强调了在下咽癌手术中实现最佳切缘的挑战。虽然正切缘和近切缘增加了复发的风险,但它们对生存的影响尚不清楚,因此需要标准化的切缘评估和量身定制的治疗策略。显著的粘膜下扩散和跳跃病变的存在需要多学科的方法。未来的研究应完善手术技术,改进术中切缘评估,优化辅助治疗方案,以提高肿瘤预后。
The impact of resection margins in hypopharyngeal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to frequently late-stage presentation and intrinsic anatomical complexity. Surgery remains a key treatment, and resection margins are crucial for local control and survival. However, achieving adequate margins is challenging due to submucosal tumour spread and common "skip lesions". This systematic review examines the impact of positive and close margins on oncological outcomes and their role in treatment planning.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).
Conclusions: This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini.
It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.).
The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief.
Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.