揭示差距:高血压和合并症的饮食影响和机器学习

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Javeria Akhter, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"揭示差距:高血压和合并症的饮食影响和机器学习","authors":"Javeria Akhter,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1111/jch.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We read with great interest the recent article by Zhang et al., “Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperlipidemia Status Among Hypertensive Patients in the Community and Influencing Factors Analysis of Blood Pressure Control,” which provides valuable insights into the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and investigates their impact on blood pressure (BP) control using a large dataset from the National Basic Public Health Service Program in Guangzhou. The authors successfully underscore key risk factors influencing BP control, including obesity, alcohol use, physical inactivity, and poor medication adherence [<span>1</span>]. Although the study presents significant findings, several methodological aspects warrant further discussion.</p><p>First, the study appropriately recognizes the increased prevalence of comorbid T2DM and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and its association with poorer BP control. However, one major constraint is the lack of stratification based on the severity of hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Given the varied nature of these conditions, a more detailed subgroup analysis considering glycemic control levels (e.g., HbA1c categories) and lipid profiles (e.g., LDL/HDL ratios) would provide deeper insights into their precise impact on BP regulation.</p><p>Second, while the study underlines key lifestyle factors affecting BP control, the role of dietary patterns is not sufficiently addressed. Prior studies have shown that dietary sodium intake, fat composition, and overall macronutrient distribution significantly affect BP levels in hypertensive patients with metabolic comorbidities [<span>2</span>]. Incorporating dietary data into the analysis would strengthen the study's conclusions and provide actionable recommendations for community-based hypertension management.</p><p>Third, although the study investigates important influencing factors on BP control, it does not sufficiently address the role of medication adherence beyond a general assessment. Hypertensive patients with comorbidities like T2DM and hyperlipidemia often require complex polypharmacy, and adherence patterns can significantly impact BP control outcomes. Previous researches have shown that factors such as medication burden, side effects, and patient perceptions of treatment efficacy affect adherence rates [<span>3</span>]. Including a more comprehensive evaluation of medication adherence, such as pill burden or self-reported adherence scales, would provide more in-depth insights into its effect on BP regulation.</p><p>Moreover, the study employs logistic regression models to identify factors associated with BP regulation, but does not include machine learning techniques, which have been increasingly used in cardiovascular research for predictive modeling. Advanced statistical approaches, such as the random forest model, could increase risk stratification and improve predictive accuracy in identifying high-risk hypertensive patients requiring intensified management [<span>4, 5</span>].</p><p>In conclusion, Zhang et al. provide an imperative contribution in understanding the effect of diabetes and hyperlipidemia on BP regulation in hypertensive patients. Though, further research is required to improve risk stratification, investigate causal pathways, and evaluate the efficiency of personalized lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. We commend the authors for their contribution and encourage further investigations into optimizing BP control strategies in hypertensive populations.</p><p>As this is a commentary on a published study and no new data were collected or analyzed, ethics approval was not required.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering Gaps: Dietary Influence and Machine Learning in Hypertension and Comorbidities\",\"authors\":\"Javeria Akhter,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We read with great interest the recent article by Zhang et al., “Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperlipidemia Status Among Hypertensive Patients in the Community and Influencing Factors Analysis of Blood Pressure Control,” which provides valuable insights into the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and investigates their impact on blood pressure (BP) control using a large dataset from the National Basic Public Health Service Program in Guangzhou. The authors successfully underscore key risk factors influencing BP control, including obesity, alcohol use, physical inactivity, and poor medication adherence [<span>1</span>]. Although the study presents significant findings, several methodological aspects warrant further discussion.</p><p>First, the study appropriately recognizes the increased prevalence of comorbid T2DM and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and its association with poorer BP control. However, one major constraint is the lack of stratification based on the severity of hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Given the varied nature of these conditions, a more detailed subgroup analysis considering glycemic control levels (e.g., HbA1c categories) and lipid profiles (e.g., LDL/HDL ratios) would provide deeper insights into their precise impact on BP regulation.</p><p>Second, while the study underlines key lifestyle factors affecting BP control, the role of dietary patterns is not sufficiently addressed. Prior studies have shown that dietary sodium intake, fat composition, and overall macronutrient distribution significantly affect BP levels in hypertensive patients with metabolic comorbidities [<span>2</span>]. Incorporating dietary data into the analysis would strengthen the study's conclusions and provide actionable recommendations for community-based hypertension management.</p><p>Third, although the study investigates important influencing factors on BP control, it does not sufficiently address the role of medication adherence beyond a general assessment. Hypertensive patients with comorbidities like T2DM and hyperlipidemia often require complex polypharmacy, and adherence patterns can significantly impact BP control outcomes. Previous researches have shown that factors such as medication burden, side effects, and patient perceptions of treatment efficacy affect adherence rates [<span>3</span>]. Including a more comprehensive evaluation of medication adherence, such as pill burden or self-reported adherence scales, would provide more in-depth insights into its effect on BP regulation.</p><p>Moreover, the study employs logistic regression models to identify factors associated with BP regulation, but does not include machine learning techniques, which have been increasingly used in cardiovascular research for predictive modeling. Advanced statistical approaches, such as the random forest model, could increase risk stratification and improve predictive accuracy in identifying high-risk hypertensive patients requiring intensified management [<span>4, 5</span>].</p><p>In conclusion, Zhang et al. provide an imperative contribution in understanding the effect of diabetes and hyperlipidemia on BP regulation in hypertensive patients. Though, further research is required to improve risk stratification, investigate causal pathways, and evaluate the efficiency of personalized lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. We commend the authors for their contribution and encourage further investigations into optimizing BP control strategies in hypertensive populations.</p><p>As this is a commentary on a published study and no new data were collected or analyzed, ethics approval was not required.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70073\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尊敬的编辑,我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Zhang等人最近的一篇文章《社区高血压患者的糖尿病和高脂血症状况及血压控制的影响因素分析》。利用广州地区国家基本公共卫生服务项目的大型数据集,对高血压患者中2型糖尿病(T2DM)和高脂血症的患病率以及对血压(BP)控制的影响提供了有价值的见解。作者成功地强调了影响血压控制的关键危险因素,包括肥胖、饮酒、缺乏体育锻炼和药物依从性差[10]。虽然这项研究提出了重要的发现,但几个方法方面值得进一步讨论。首先,该研究恰当地认识到高血压患者中合并T2DM和高脂血症的患病率增加及其与较差的血压控制的关联。然而,一个主要的限制是缺乏基于高脂血症和糖尿病严重程度的分层。鉴于这些疾病的不同性质,考虑到血糖控制水平(例如,HbA1c类别)和脂质谱(例如,LDL/HDL比率)的更详细的亚组分析将更深入地了解它们对血压调节的确切影响。其次,虽然研究强调了影响血压控制的关键生活方式因素,但饮食模式的作用并没有得到充分的解决。先前的研究表明,膳食钠摄入量、脂肪组成和总体宏量营养素分布显著影响伴有代谢合并症的高血压患者的血压水平。将饮食数据纳入分析将加强研究结论,并为社区高血压管理提供可行的建议。第三,尽管该研究调查了影响血压控制的重要因素,但它并没有充分解决药物依从性在一般评估之外的作用。伴有2型糖尿病和高脂血症等合并症的高血压患者通常需要复杂的多药治疗,依从性模式可显著影响血压控制结果。先前的研究表明,药物负担、副作用和患者对治疗效果的认知等因素会影响依从率[10]。包括更全面的药物依从性评估,如药丸负担或自我报告的依从性量表,将提供更深入的见解,以了解其对血压调节的影响。此外,该研究采用逻辑回归模型来识别与血压调节相关的因素,但不包括机器学习技术,而机器学习技术已越来越多地用于心血管研究的预测建模。先进的统计方法,如随机森林模型,可以增加风险分层,提高预测准确性,以识别需要加强管理的高危高血压患者[4,5]。总之,Zhang等人对了解糖尿病和高脂血症对高血压患者血压调节的影响做出了重要贡献。然而,需要进一步的研究来改善风险分层,调查因果途径,并评估个性化生活方式和药物干预的效率。我们赞扬作者的贡献,并鼓励进一步研究优化高血压人群的血压控制策略。由于这是对已发表研究的评论,没有收集或分析新的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering Gaps: Dietary Influence and Machine Learning in Hypertension and Comorbidities

Dear Editor,

We read with great interest the recent article by Zhang et al., “Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperlipidemia Status Among Hypertensive Patients in the Community and Influencing Factors Analysis of Blood Pressure Control,” which provides valuable insights into the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and investigates their impact on blood pressure (BP) control using a large dataset from the National Basic Public Health Service Program in Guangzhou. The authors successfully underscore key risk factors influencing BP control, including obesity, alcohol use, physical inactivity, and poor medication adherence [1]. Although the study presents significant findings, several methodological aspects warrant further discussion.

First, the study appropriately recognizes the increased prevalence of comorbid T2DM and hyperlipidemia among hypertensive patients and its association with poorer BP control. However, one major constraint is the lack of stratification based on the severity of hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Given the varied nature of these conditions, a more detailed subgroup analysis considering glycemic control levels (e.g., HbA1c categories) and lipid profiles (e.g., LDL/HDL ratios) would provide deeper insights into their precise impact on BP regulation.

Second, while the study underlines key lifestyle factors affecting BP control, the role of dietary patterns is not sufficiently addressed. Prior studies have shown that dietary sodium intake, fat composition, and overall macronutrient distribution significantly affect BP levels in hypertensive patients with metabolic comorbidities [2]. Incorporating dietary data into the analysis would strengthen the study's conclusions and provide actionable recommendations for community-based hypertension management.

Third, although the study investigates important influencing factors on BP control, it does not sufficiently address the role of medication adherence beyond a general assessment. Hypertensive patients with comorbidities like T2DM and hyperlipidemia often require complex polypharmacy, and adherence patterns can significantly impact BP control outcomes. Previous researches have shown that factors such as medication burden, side effects, and patient perceptions of treatment efficacy affect adherence rates [3]. Including a more comprehensive evaluation of medication adherence, such as pill burden or self-reported adherence scales, would provide more in-depth insights into its effect on BP regulation.

Moreover, the study employs logistic regression models to identify factors associated with BP regulation, but does not include machine learning techniques, which have been increasingly used in cardiovascular research for predictive modeling. Advanced statistical approaches, such as the random forest model, could increase risk stratification and improve predictive accuracy in identifying high-risk hypertensive patients requiring intensified management [4, 5].

In conclusion, Zhang et al. provide an imperative contribution in understanding the effect of diabetes and hyperlipidemia on BP regulation in hypertensive patients. Though, further research is required to improve risk stratification, investigate causal pathways, and evaluate the efficiency of personalized lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. We commend the authors for their contribution and encourage further investigations into optimizing BP control strategies in hypertensive populations.

As this is a commentary on a published study and no new data were collected or analyzed, ethics approval was not required.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信