经阴道超声诊断子宫内膜异位症:澳大利亚超声医师目前的做法和障碍

Q3 Medicine
Xinyu Yang, Alison Deslandes, Teresa Cross, Jessie Childs
{"title":"经阴道超声诊断子宫内膜异位症:澳大利亚超声医师目前的做法和障碍","authors":"Xinyu Yang,&nbsp;Alison Deslandes,&nbsp;Teresa Cross,&nbsp;Jessie Childs","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The 2016 consensus statement from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group (IDEA) outlined a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) approach specific for the sonographic assessment of endometriosis (eTVUS). However, eTVUS remains a nonroutine sonographic examination, and the reasons for this are not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the current performance of eTVUS among Australian sonographers and the barriers and facilitators encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS into routine practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated to Australian sonographers. Quantitative and qualitative questions were asked regarding demographic information, eTVUS performance and experiences encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS. Statistical and thematic analyses were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 127 responses were analysed, with 47.8% of respondents performing a full or partial eTVUS routinely. When a gynaecological ultrasound is referred, 18.4% of participants reported performing a full assessment of eTVUS, and 29.8% reported performing a partial assessment of eTVUS. When a partial eTVUS was performed, respondents indicated this mostly included an assessment of the sliding sign (94.6%) and ovarian mobility (97.3%), rather than a search for endometriotic nodules. Only 41.5% of all participants reported confidence in performing eTVUS.</p>\n \n <p>The main barriers that limited the uptake of eTVUS were limited supervision/mentors (42.3%), limited reporting of eTVUS (39.6%) and its steep learning curve (38.7%). The main facilitators included sonographers' desire to answer the clinical question for suspected endometriosis (84.0%), external education (38.7%), local department protocols (30.7%) and colleagues who perform eTVUS (30.7%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While eTVUS, or aspects of it, are being performed in most imaging practices, inconsistency exists for the anatomical structures assessed as part of an eTVUS. Although barriers exist, more education surrounding eTVUS for sonographers, reporting doctors, and referrers could help increase uptake into routine practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: Current Practices and Barriers in Australian Sonographers\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Yang,&nbsp;Alison Deslandes,&nbsp;Teresa Cross,&nbsp;Jessie Childs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajum.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The 2016 consensus statement from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group (IDEA) outlined a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) approach specific for the sonographic assessment of endometriosis (eTVUS). However, eTVUS remains a nonroutine sonographic examination, and the reasons for this are not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the current performance of eTVUS among Australian sonographers and the barriers and facilitators encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS into routine practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated to Australian sonographers. Quantitative and qualitative questions were asked regarding demographic information, eTVUS performance and experiences encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS. Statistical and thematic analyses were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 127 responses were analysed, with 47.8% of respondents performing a full or partial eTVUS routinely. When a gynaecological ultrasound is referred, 18.4% of participants reported performing a full assessment of eTVUS, and 29.8% reported performing a partial assessment of eTVUS. When a partial eTVUS was performed, respondents indicated this mostly included an assessment of the sliding sign (94.6%) and ovarian mobility (97.3%), rather than a search for endometriotic nodules. Only 41.5% of all participants reported confidence in performing eTVUS.</p>\\n \\n <p>The main barriers that limited the uptake of eTVUS were limited supervision/mentors (42.3%), limited reporting of eTVUS (39.6%) and its steep learning curve (38.7%). The main facilitators included sonographers' desire to answer the clinical question for suspected endometriosis (84.0%), external education (38.7%), local department protocols (30.7%) and colleagues who perform eTVUS (30.7%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While eTVUS, or aspects of it, are being performed in most imaging practices, inconsistency exists for the anatomical structures assessed as part of an eTVUS. Although barriers exist, more education surrounding eTVUS for sonographers, reporting doctors, and referrers could help increase uptake into routine practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际深部子宫内膜异位症分析小组(IDEA)的2016年共识声明概述了一种针对子宫内膜异位症(eTVUS)超声评估的经阴道超声(TVUS)方法。然而,eTVUS仍然是一种非常规的超声检查,其原因尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚超声医师学习eTVUS的现状,以及在日常实践中学习和实施eTVUS的障碍和促进因素。方法对澳大利亚超声医师进行在线横断面调查。就人口统计信息、eTVUS的表现以及学习和实施eTVUS时遇到的经验提出了定量和定性问题。进行了统计分析和专题分析。结果共分析了127份应答,其中47.8%的应答者常规进行了全部或部分eTVUS。当进行妇科超声检查时,18.4%的参与者报告对eTVUS进行了全面评估,29.8%的参与者报告对eTVUS进行了部分评估。当进行部分eTVUS时,受访者表示,这主要包括评估滑动征(94.6%)和卵巢活动(97.3%),而不是寻找子宫内膜异位性结节。只有41.5%的参与者表示有信心执行eTVUS。限制学生采用eTVUS的主要障碍是监督/导师有限(42.3%)、eTVUS报告有限(39.6%)和学习曲线陡峭(38.7%)。主要影响因素包括超声医师对疑似子宫内膜异位症临床问题的回答意愿(84.0%)、外部教育(38.7%)、当地科室协议(30.7%)和实施eTVUS的同事(30.7%)。结论:虽然eTVUS或eTVUS的某些方面在大多数成像实践中都得到了应用,但作为eTVUS一部分的解剖结构评估存在不一致性。尽管存在障碍,但对超声医师、报告医生和转诊医生进行更多关于eTVUS的教育可以帮助增加常规实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis: Current Practices and Barriers in Australian Sonographers

Introduction/Purpose

The 2016 consensus statement from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group (IDEA) outlined a transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) approach specific for the sonographic assessment of endometriosis (eTVUS). However, eTVUS remains a nonroutine sonographic examination, and the reasons for this are not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the current performance of eTVUS among Australian sonographers and the barriers and facilitators encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS into routine practice.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated to Australian sonographers. Quantitative and qualitative questions were asked regarding demographic information, eTVUS performance and experiences encountered when learning and implementing eTVUS. Statistical and thematic analyses were performed.

Results

In total, 127 responses were analysed, with 47.8% of respondents performing a full or partial eTVUS routinely. When a gynaecological ultrasound is referred, 18.4% of participants reported performing a full assessment of eTVUS, and 29.8% reported performing a partial assessment of eTVUS. When a partial eTVUS was performed, respondents indicated this mostly included an assessment of the sliding sign (94.6%) and ovarian mobility (97.3%), rather than a search for endometriotic nodules. Only 41.5% of all participants reported confidence in performing eTVUS.

The main barriers that limited the uptake of eTVUS were limited supervision/mentors (42.3%), limited reporting of eTVUS (39.6%) and its steep learning curve (38.7%). The main facilitators included sonographers' desire to answer the clinical question for suspected endometriosis (84.0%), external education (38.7%), local department protocols (30.7%) and colleagues who perform eTVUS (30.7%).

Conclusion

While eTVUS, or aspects of it, are being performed in most imaging practices, inconsistency exists for the anatomical structures assessed as part of an eTVUS. Although barriers exist, more education surrounding eTVUS for sonographers, reporting doctors, and referrers could help increase uptake into routine practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信