政治制度、制度环境和外来直接投资

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
R. Michael Holmes Jr. , Kai Xu , Michael A. Hitt
{"title":"政治制度、制度环境和外来直接投资","authors":"R. Michael Holmes Jr. ,&nbsp;Kai Xu ,&nbsp;Michael A. Hitt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 115447"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political institutions, the institutional milieu, and inward foreign direct investment\",\"authors\":\"R. Michael Holmes Jr. ,&nbsp;Kai Xu ,&nbsp;Michael A. Hitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500270X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500270X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用配置理论和方法,本研究确定了形成一个国家对外来直接投资吸引力的正式制度、非正式制度和经济因素的组合。模糊集定性比较分析分析了67个国家和11年的23个指标,揭示了促进外国直接投资的四种配置。民主政治制度在两种情况下都很重要,专制政治制度在一种情况下很重要,而在另一种情况下都不重要。此外,根据政治制度的性质,监管机构、经济机构和四种文化属性的各种属性对流入的外国直接投资有不同的影响。最后,GDP增长在所有配置中都吸引了外国直接投资,而人均GDP在三种配置中都吸引了外国直接投资。这些发现通过强调制度和经济条件的相互依存关系,推进了多中心和制度经济学的理论视角。我们的研究表明,学者们应该考虑更广泛的制度环境、经济背景和外国直接投资的各种动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political institutions, the institutional milieu, and inward foreign direct investment
Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信