{"title":"政治制度、制度环境和外来直接投资","authors":"R. Michael Holmes Jr. , Kai Xu , Michael A. Hitt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 115447"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political institutions, the institutional milieu, and inward foreign direct investment\",\"authors\":\"R. Michael Holmes Jr. , Kai Xu , Michael A. Hitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500270X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500270X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Political institutions, the institutional milieu, and inward foreign direct investment
Using configurational theory and methods, this study identifies combinations of formal institutions, informal institutions, and economic factors that shape a country’s attractiveness for inward foreign direct investment. Analyzing 67 countries and 23 indicators over eleven years, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis reveals four configurations that boost inward FDI. Democratic political institutions are important in two configurations, autocratic political institutions in one, and neither in the other. Additionally, various attributes of regulatory institutions, economic institutions, and four cultural attributes differentially influence inward FDI, depending on the nature of political institutions. Lastly, GDP growth attracted inward FDI in all configurations, while GDP per capita does so in three. The findings advance polycentric and institutional economics theoretical perspectives by highlighting the interdependence of institutions and economic conditions. Our study suggests that scholars should consider the broader institutional milieu, the economic context, and various motivations for the FDI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.