剑麻废料的水热气化可替代传统的气化生产富氢气

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Emmanuel Brown, Francis Njoka, Booker Osodo, Emmanuel Kombe
{"title":"剑麻废料的水热气化可替代传统的气化生产富氢气","authors":"Emmanuel Brown,&nbsp;Francis Njoka,&nbsp;Booker Osodo,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kombe","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gasification of biomass is widely recognized as a practical method of enhancing sustainable generation of hydrogen. This research investigates the optimal gasification pathway for higher hydrogen gas yields in syngas produced from sisal wastes. Comparative studies on steam gasification (SG) and hydrothermal gasification (HTG) are modeled using Aspen Plus software. Key operating parameters including, temperature, pressure, and gasifying agent, are systematically analyzed for the two gasification methods. Optimization studies are further performed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Design Expert software to determine the ideal operational conditions for each process. Results demonstrate that temperature exhibits positive effects on the hydrogen yield in HTG compared to SG. For both processes, increasing the gasifying agent enhances hydrogen yields. Optimization findings reveal that HTG outperforms SG in hydrogen production, although with a lower CGE to that of SG. The optimization results revealed high desirability values of 0.949 and 0.957 for the optimized conditions of HTG and SG, respectively. This study underscores the significance of process-specific parameter optimization and highlights HTG as a superior technology for converting sisal waste into hydrogen-rich syngas, offering enhanced efficiency and greater adaptability to the feedstock’s inherent characteristics. These insights provide a robust framework for advancing sustainable biomass gasification technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"339 ","pages":"Article 119968"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrothermal gasification of sisal wastes as an alternative to conventional gasification for hydrogen-rich gas production\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Brown,&nbsp;Francis Njoka,&nbsp;Booker Osodo,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kombe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gasification of biomass is widely recognized as a practical method of enhancing sustainable generation of hydrogen. This research investigates the optimal gasification pathway for higher hydrogen gas yields in syngas produced from sisal wastes. Comparative studies on steam gasification (SG) and hydrothermal gasification (HTG) are modeled using Aspen Plus software. Key operating parameters including, temperature, pressure, and gasifying agent, are systematically analyzed for the two gasification methods. Optimization studies are further performed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Design Expert software to determine the ideal operational conditions for each process. Results demonstrate that temperature exhibits positive effects on the hydrogen yield in HTG compared to SG. For both processes, increasing the gasifying agent enhances hydrogen yields. Optimization findings reveal that HTG outperforms SG in hydrogen production, although with a lower CGE to that of SG. The optimization results revealed high desirability values of 0.949 and 0.957 for the optimized conditions of HTG and SG, respectively. This study underscores the significance of process-specific parameter optimization and highlights HTG as a superior technology for converting sisal waste into hydrogen-rich syngas, offering enhanced efficiency and greater adaptability to the feedstock’s inherent characteristics. These insights provide a robust framework for advancing sustainable biomass gasification technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"339 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425004923\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425004923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物质气化被广泛认为是一种实用的方法,提高可持续生产的氢。本研究探讨了剑麻废弃物合成气的最佳气化途径,以提高氢气产量。利用Aspen Plus软件对蒸汽气化(SG)和水热气化(HTG)进行了建模比较研究。系统地分析了两种气化方法的关键操作参数,包括温度、压力和气化剂。在Design Expert软件中使用响应面法(RSM)进一步进行优化研究,以确定每个过程的理想操作条件。结果表明,与SG相比,温度对HTG的产氢率有积极影响。对于这两种工艺,增加气化剂可以提高氢气产量。优化结果表明,HTG在制氢方面优于SG,尽管其CGE低于SG。优化结果表明,HTG和SG的优化条件的理想值分别为0.949和0.957。该研究强调了特定工艺参数优化的重要性,并强调HTG是将剑麻废物转化为富氢合成气的优越技术,可以提高效率并更好地适应原料的固有特性。这些见解为推进可持续生物质气化技术提供了一个强有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrothermal gasification of sisal wastes as an alternative to conventional gasification for hydrogen-rich gas production
Gasification of biomass is widely recognized as a practical method of enhancing sustainable generation of hydrogen. This research investigates the optimal gasification pathway for higher hydrogen gas yields in syngas produced from sisal wastes. Comparative studies on steam gasification (SG) and hydrothermal gasification (HTG) are modeled using Aspen Plus software. Key operating parameters including, temperature, pressure, and gasifying agent, are systematically analyzed for the two gasification methods. Optimization studies are further performed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in Design Expert software to determine the ideal operational conditions for each process. Results demonstrate that temperature exhibits positive effects on the hydrogen yield in HTG compared to SG. For both processes, increasing the gasifying agent enhances hydrogen yields. Optimization findings reveal that HTG outperforms SG in hydrogen production, although with a lower CGE to that of SG. The optimization results revealed high desirability values of 0.949 and 0.957 for the optimized conditions of HTG and SG, respectively. This study underscores the significance of process-specific parameter optimization and highlights HTG as a superior technology for converting sisal waste into hydrogen-rich syngas, offering enhanced efficiency and greater adaptability to the feedstock’s inherent characteristics. These insights provide a robust framework for advancing sustainable biomass gasification technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信