基于物理的建筑性能模拟机器学习——一个新兴领域的回顾

IF 13.8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zixin Jiang , Xuezheng Wang , Han Li , Tianzhen Hong , Fengqi You , Ján Drgoňa , Draguna Vrabie , Bing Dong
{"title":"基于物理的建筑性能模拟机器学习——一个新兴领域的回顾","authors":"Zixin Jiang ,&nbsp;Xuezheng Wang ,&nbsp;Han Li ,&nbsp;Tianzhen Hong ,&nbsp;Fengqi You ,&nbsp;Ján Drgoňa ,&nbsp;Draguna Vrabie ,&nbsp;Bing Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building performance simulation (BPS) is critical for understanding building dynamics and behavior, analyzing the performance of the built environment, optimizing energy efficiency, improving demand flexibility, and enhancing building resilience. However, conducting BPS is not trivial. Traditional BPS relies on accurate building energy models, which are primarily physics-based and heavily dependent on detailed building information, expert knowledge, and case-by-case model calibrations, significantly limiting their scalability. With the development of sensing technology and the increased availability of data, there is growing attention and interest in data-driven BPS. However, purely data-driven models often suffer from limited generalization ability and a lack of physical consistency, resulting in poor performance in real-world applications. To address these limitations, recent studies have begun integrating physics priors into data-driven models, a methodology known as physics-informed machine learning (PIML). PIML is an emerging field where its definitions, methodologies, evaluation criteria, application scenarios, and future directions remain open. To bridge those gaps, this study systematically reviews the state-of-the-art PIML for BPS, offering a comprehensive definition of PIML and comparing it to traditional BPS approaches regarding data requirements, modeling effort, performance, and computational cost. We also summarize the commonly used methodologies, validation approaches, application domains, available data sources, open-source packages, and testbeds. In addition, this study provides a general guideline for selecting appropriate PIML models based on BPS applications. Finally, this study identifies key challenges and outlines future research directions, providing a solid foundation and valuable insights to advance R&amp;D of PIML in BPS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34615,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Applied Energy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics-informed machine learning for building performance simulation-A review of a nascent field\",\"authors\":\"Zixin Jiang ,&nbsp;Xuezheng Wang ,&nbsp;Han Li ,&nbsp;Tianzhen Hong ,&nbsp;Fengqi You ,&nbsp;Ján Drgoňa ,&nbsp;Draguna Vrabie ,&nbsp;Bing Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Building performance simulation (BPS) is critical for understanding building dynamics and behavior, analyzing the performance of the built environment, optimizing energy efficiency, improving demand flexibility, and enhancing building resilience. However, conducting BPS is not trivial. Traditional BPS relies on accurate building energy models, which are primarily physics-based and heavily dependent on detailed building information, expert knowledge, and case-by-case model calibrations, significantly limiting their scalability. With the development of sensing technology and the increased availability of data, there is growing attention and interest in data-driven BPS. However, purely data-driven models often suffer from limited generalization ability and a lack of physical consistency, resulting in poor performance in real-world applications. To address these limitations, recent studies have begun integrating physics priors into data-driven models, a methodology known as physics-informed machine learning (PIML). PIML is an emerging field where its definitions, methodologies, evaluation criteria, application scenarios, and future directions remain open. To bridge those gaps, this study systematically reviews the state-of-the-art PIML for BPS, offering a comprehensive definition of PIML and comparing it to traditional BPS approaches regarding data requirements, modeling effort, performance, and computational cost. We also summarize the commonly used methodologies, validation approaches, application domains, available data sources, open-source packages, and testbeds. In addition, this study provides a general guideline for selecting appropriate PIML models based on BPS applications. Finally, this study identifies key challenges and outlines future research directions, providing a solid foundation and valuable insights to advance R&amp;D of PIML in BPS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792425000174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792425000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑性能模拟(BPS)对于理解建筑动力学和行为、分析建筑环境性能、优化能源效率、提高需求灵活性和增强建筑弹性至关重要。然而,实施BPS并非微不足道。传统的BPS依赖于精确的建筑能源模型,这些模型主要基于物理,严重依赖于详细的建筑信息、专家知识和逐个模型校准,这极大地限制了它们的可扩展性。随着传感技术的发展和数据可用性的增加,数据驱动的bp系统受到越来越多的关注和兴趣。然而,纯数据驱动的模型往往泛化能力有限,缺乏物理一致性,导致在实际应用中的性能不佳。为了解决这些限制,最近的研究已经开始将物理先验整合到数据驱动模型中,这种方法被称为物理信息机器学习(PIML)。PIML是一个新兴领域,其定义、方法、评估标准、应用场景和未来方向仍然是开放的。为了弥补这些差距,本研究系统地回顾了最先进的用于BPS的PIML,提供了PIML的综合定义,并将其与传统的BPS方法在数据需求、建模工作、性能和计算成本方面进行了比较。我们还总结了常用的方法、验证方法、应用程序域、可用数据源、开源软件包和测试平台。此外,该研究还为基于BPS应用选择合适的PIML模型提供了一般指导。最后,本研究指出了关键挑战并概述了未来的研究方向,为推进BPS中PIML的研发提供了坚实的基础和有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physics-informed machine learning for building performance simulation-A review of a nascent field
Building performance simulation (BPS) is critical for understanding building dynamics and behavior, analyzing the performance of the built environment, optimizing energy efficiency, improving demand flexibility, and enhancing building resilience. However, conducting BPS is not trivial. Traditional BPS relies on accurate building energy models, which are primarily physics-based and heavily dependent on detailed building information, expert knowledge, and case-by-case model calibrations, significantly limiting their scalability. With the development of sensing technology and the increased availability of data, there is growing attention and interest in data-driven BPS. However, purely data-driven models often suffer from limited generalization ability and a lack of physical consistency, resulting in poor performance in real-world applications. To address these limitations, recent studies have begun integrating physics priors into data-driven models, a methodology known as physics-informed machine learning (PIML). PIML is an emerging field where its definitions, methodologies, evaluation criteria, application scenarios, and future directions remain open. To bridge those gaps, this study systematically reviews the state-of-the-art PIML for BPS, offering a comprehensive definition of PIML and comparing it to traditional BPS approaches regarding data requirements, modeling effort, performance, and computational cost. We also summarize the commonly used methodologies, validation approaches, application domains, available data sources, open-source packages, and testbeds. In addition, this study provides a general guideline for selecting appropriate PIML models based on BPS applications. Finally, this study identifies key challenges and outlines future research directions, providing a solid foundation and valuable insights to advance R&D of PIML in BPS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Applied Energy
Advances in Applied Energy Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信