M.A. Cowan , E.I.F. Wooster , L.A. Gibson , S.A. Setterfield , J.A. Dunlop , D.G. Nimmo
{"title":"采矿在当地和景观尺度上重塑了动物群落","authors":"M.A. Cowan , E.I.F. Wooster , L.A. Gibson , S.A. Setterfield , J.A. Dunlop , D.G. Nimmo","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic disturbances, such as mining, significantly modify landscapes and can have negative effects on ecosystems and the wildlife therein. Here, we investigate the ecological impacts of mining camps (semi-urban accommodation areas in mining landscapes) on wildlife communities, including for species composition and diversity, ecosystem function, predator-prey networks, and temporal activity. Using a distributed control-impact design, we deployed camera traps at mining camps and ecologically similar reference landscapes across Western Australia's Pilbara region. We found a marked difference in species composition at mining camps, suggesting the formation of novel assemblages. Lower functional dispersion at mining camps suggests that the ecological functions being performed by species here are less varied, although ecosystems at mining camps have high functional redundancy, likely buffering the effects of future disturbance. Predator-prey networks at mining camps had similar overall structure to reference landscapes despite major differences in species composition. However, lower network connectance at mining camps suggests that food webs are more vulnerable to future disturbance or species loss. Behavioural animal responses included altered temporal activity by some animal groups, shifting predator and competition pressures at mining camps. Certain animal groups (e.g., dingoes, feral herbivores) were more resilient to disturbance, while localised effects at mining camps highlight the differing influences of disturbance at different scales. These results demonstrate the complex impacts of human disturbance on animal communities and ecosystems, and the need to consider community-wide approaches when undertaking management in modified landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"308 ","pages":"Article 111252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining reshapes animal communities at a local and landscape-scale\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Cowan , E.I.F. Wooster , L.A. Gibson , S.A. Setterfield , J.A. Dunlop , D.G. Nimmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anthropogenic disturbances, such as mining, significantly modify landscapes and can have negative effects on ecosystems and the wildlife therein. Here, we investigate the ecological impacts of mining camps (semi-urban accommodation areas in mining landscapes) on wildlife communities, including for species composition and diversity, ecosystem function, predator-prey networks, and temporal activity. Using a distributed control-impact design, we deployed camera traps at mining camps and ecologically similar reference landscapes across Western Australia's Pilbara region. We found a marked difference in species composition at mining camps, suggesting the formation of novel assemblages. Lower functional dispersion at mining camps suggests that the ecological functions being performed by species here are less varied, although ecosystems at mining camps have high functional redundancy, likely buffering the effects of future disturbance. Predator-prey networks at mining camps had similar overall structure to reference landscapes despite major differences in species composition. However, lower network connectance at mining camps suggests that food webs are more vulnerable to future disturbance or species loss. Behavioural animal responses included altered temporal activity by some animal groups, shifting predator and competition pressures at mining camps. Certain animal groups (e.g., dingoes, feral herbivores) were more resilient to disturbance, while localised effects at mining camps highlight the differing influences of disturbance at different scales. These results demonstrate the complex impacts of human disturbance on animal communities and ecosystems, and the need to consider community-wide approaches when undertaking management in modified landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"308 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725002897\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725002897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mining reshapes animal communities at a local and landscape-scale
Anthropogenic disturbances, such as mining, significantly modify landscapes and can have negative effects on ecosystems and the wildlife therein. Here, we investigate the ecological impacts of mining camps (semi-urban accommodation areas in mining landscapes) on wildlife communities, including for species composition and diversity, ecosystem function, predator-prey networks, and temporal activity. Using a distributed control-impact design, we deployed camera traps at mining camps and ecologically similar reference landscapes across Western Australia's Pilbara region. We found a marked difference in species composition at mining camps, suggesting the formation of novel assemblages. Lower functional dispersion at mining camps suggests that the ecological functions being performed by species here are less varied, although ecosystems at mining camps have high functional redundancy, likely buffering the effects of future disturbance. Predator-prey networks at mining camps had similar overall structure to reference landscapes despite major differences in species composition. However, lower network connectance at mining camps suggests that food webs are more vulnerable to future disturbance or species loss. Behavioural animal responses included altered temporal activity by some animal groups, shifting predator and competition pressures at mining camps. Certain animal groups (e.g., dingoes, feral herbivores) were more resilient to disturbance, while localised effects at mining camps highlight the differing influences of disturbance at different scales. These results demonstrate the complex impacts of human disturbance on animal communities and ecosystems, and the need to consider community-wide approaches when undertaking management in modified landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.