超声引导下新型手术刀腕管释放术的安全性和有效性:100例尸体标本的比较研究

Q3 Medicine
Jérôme Garret MD , Jean-Michel Cognet MD , Floris van Rooij MSc , Thomas Apard MD
{"title":"超声引导下新型手术刀腕管释放术的安全性和有效性:100例尸体标本的比较研究","authors":"Jérôme Garret MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Cognet MD ,&nbsp;Floris van Rooij MSc ,&nbsp;Thomas Apard MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the carpal tunnel release surgery in cadaveric specimens, using a newly developed surgical knife incorporating a guide, with and without ultrasound guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For this study, 100 fresh frozen human cadaveric hands, free from fractures or surgical antecedents, were used (mean age: 71.3 ± 15.8 years, 60 men and 40 women). The specimens were allocated into two groups of 50 to undergo carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound guidance, using the knife and guide (KeriKnife, KeriMedical) by four experienced hand surgeons. Donor demographics and operated side were recorded. Following surgery, every surgeon reported the difficulty of cutting the ligament on a scale of 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult), whether the ligament was completely cut, and whether the intervention caused any injuries to the surrounding structures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, weight, or side. Following surgery, the surgeons rated the difficulty similarly between the groups. The ligament was incompletely cut in one (2%) specimen that underwent the surgery with ultrasound, whereas it was incomplete in two (4%) that underwent the surgery without ultrasound, although the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was one injury in the group without ultrasound.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The KeriKnife has shown its effectiveness for carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound control. The only iatrogenic injury happened during the surgical release without ultrasound control.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Carpal Tunnel Release Using a New Surgical Knife With and Without Ultrasound Guidance: Comparative Study in 100 Cadaveric Specimens\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Garret MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Cognet MD ,&nbsp;Floris van Rooij MSc ,&nbsp;Thomas Apard MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the carpal tunnel release surgery in cadaveric specimens, using a newly developed surgical knife incorporating a guide, with and without ultrasound guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For this study, 100 fresh frozen human cadaveric hands, free from fractures or surgical antecedents, were used (mean age: 71.3 ± 15.8 years, 60 men and 40 women). The specimens were allocated into two groups of 50 to undergo carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound guidance, using the knife and guide (KeriKnife, KeriMedical) by four experienced hand surgeons. Donor demographics and operated side were recorded. Following surgery, every surgeon reported the difficulty of cutting the ligament on a scale of 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult), whether the ligament was completely cut, and whether the intervention caused any injuries to the surrounding structures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, weight, or side. Following surgery, the surgeons rated the difficulty similarly between the groups. The ligament was incompletely cut in one (2%) specimen that underwent the surgery with ultrasound, whereas it was incomplete in two (4%) that underwent the surgery without ultrasound, although the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was one injury in the group without ultrasound.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The KeriKnife has shown its effectiveness for carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound control. The only iatrogenic injury happened during the surgical release without ultrasound control.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic III.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125000490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较新研制的带导向的手术刀在有和没有超声引导的情况下对尸体标本进行腕管松解手术的安全性和有效性。方法采用无骨折或手术前处理的新鲜冷冻人尸体手100例(平均年龄:71.3±15.8岁,男性60例,女性40例)。将标本分为两组,每组50例,分别由4名经验丰富的手外科医生使用刀和引导器(KeriKnife, KeriMedical)进行超声引导或不超声引导下的腕管松解术。记录供体人口统计和手术侧。术后,每位外科医生报告切开韧带的难度,从1分(容易)到5分(困难),韧带是否完全切开,干预是否对周围结构造成损伤。结果两组患者在年龄、性别、体重、侧位等方面无差异。手术后,外科医生对两组难度的评分相似。超声手术组有1例(2%)韧带不完全切断,而无超声手术组有2例(4%)韧带不完全切断,但差异无统计学意义。无超声组有1例损伤。结论KeriKnife在有或无超声控制的情况下对腕管松解术均有良好的疗效。唯一的医源性损伤发生在无超声控制的手术释放过程中。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Carpal Tunnel Release Using a New Surgical Knife With and Without Ultrasound Guidance: Comparative Study in 100 Cadaveric Specimens

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the carpal tunnel release surgery in cadaveric specimens, using a newly developed surgical knife incorporating a guide, with and without ultrasound guidance.

Methods

For this study, 100 fresh frozen human cadaveric hands, free from fractures or surgical antecedents, were used (mean age: 71.3 ± 15.8 years, 60 men and 40 women). The specimens were allocated into two groups of 50 to undergo carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound guidance, using the knife and guide (KeriKnife, KeriMedical) by four experienced hand surgeons. Donor demographics and operated side were recorded. Following surgery, every surgeon reported the difficulty of cutting the ligament on a scale of 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult), whether the ligament was completely cut, and whether the intervention caused any injuries to the surrounding structures.

Results

There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, weight, or side. Following surgery, the surgeons rated the difficulty similarly between the groups. The ligament was incompletely cut in one (2%) specimen that underwent the surgery with ultrasound, whereas it was incomplete in two (4%) that underwent the surgery without ultrasound, although the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was one injury in the group without ultrasound.

Conclusions

The KeriKnife has shown its effectiveness for carpal tunnel release with or without ultrasound control. The only iatrogenic injury happened during the surgical release without ultrasound control.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信