Jeffrey B. Velotta MD, FACS , Jason Hammer MD , Vivek Mukhatyar PhD
{"title":"生物补片覆盖软组织缺损胸壁重建:综述","authors":"Jeffrey B. Velotta MD, FACS , Jason Hammer MD , Vivek Mukhatyar PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chest wall reconstruction (CWR) is used in functional and/or aesthetic impairments of the thoracic wall following resection. This review summarizes literature for soft tissue coverage with biologic mesh in CWR and reports use of a porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in CWR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search identified studies that use biologic mesh in CWR, and expert opinion for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects is provided.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CWR with biologic mesh is used to provide soft tissue coverage for various medical conditions, including oncologic tumor resections, trauma, congenital malformations, and in complex procedures, such as large thoracic defects, presence of infection, and prior radiation of the chest wall. Compared with synthetic mesh, fewer overall complications, infections, and mesh explantations have been reported with biologic mesh in retrospective studies of patients who underwent CWR with surgical mesh. However, there are limited published data on the use of biologic mesh for CWR, and there are no published randomized controlled trials comparing synthetic <em>versus</em> biologic mesh in CWR. A case study for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects demonstrates a successful outcome with more than 6 y of follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of biological mesh in CWR is supported by literature and expert opinion. However, more robust clinical data on risks and benefits of types of mesh are needed to aid surgeons in selecting mesh.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"311 ","pages":"Pages 98-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest Wall Reconstruction Using Biologic Mesh to Cover Soft Tissue Defects: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey B. Velotta MD, FACS , Jason Hammer MD , Vivek Mukhatyar PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.04.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chest wall reconstruction (CWR) is used in functional and/or aesthetic impairments of the thoracic wall following resection. This review summarizes literature for soft tissue coverage with biologic mesh in CWR and reports use of a porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in CWR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search identified studies that use biologic mesh in CWR, and expert opinion for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects is provided.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CWR with biologic mesh is used to provide soft tissue coverage for various medical conditions, including oncologic tumor resections, trauma, congenital malformations, and in complex procedures, such as large thoracic defects, presence of infection, and prior radiation of the chest wall. Compared with synthetic mesh, fewer overall complications, infections, and mesh explantations have been reported with biologic mesh in retrospective studies of patients who underwent CWR with surgical mesh. However, there are limited published data on the use of biologic mesh for CWR, and there are no published randomized controlled trials comparing synthetic <em>versus</em> biologic mesh in CWR. A case study for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects demonstrates a successful outcome with more than 6 y of follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of biological mesh in CWR is supported by literature and expert opinion. However, more robust clinical data on risks and benefits of types of mesh are needed to aid surgeons in selecting mesh.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 98-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chest Wall Reconstruction Using Biologic Mesh to Cover Soft Tissue Defects: A Narrative Review
Introduction
Chest wall reconstruction (CWR) is used in functional and/or aesthetic impairments of the thoracic wall following resection. This review summarizes literature for soft tissue coverage with biologic mesh in CWR and reports use of a porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in CWR.
Methods
A literature search identified studies that use biologic mesh in CWR, and expert opinion for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects is provided.
Results
CWR with biologic mesh is used to provide soft tissue coverage for various medical conditions, including oncologic tumor resections, trauma, congenital malformations, and in complex procedures, such as large thoracic defects, presence of infection, and prior radiation of the chest wall. Compared with synthetic mesh, fewer overall complications, infections, and mesh explantations have been reported with biologic mesh in retrospective studies of patients who underwent CWR with surgical mesh. However, there are limited published data on the use of biologic mesh for CWR, and there are no published randomized controlled trials comparing synthetic versus biologic mesh in CWR. A case study for the use of a porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction to repair large chest wall defects demonstrates a successful outcome with more than 6 y of follow-up.
Conclusions
Use of biological mesh in CWR is supported by literature and expert opinion. However, more robust clinical data on risks and benefits of types of mesh are needed to aid surgeons in selecting mesh.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.