青年夫妻冲突中亲密伴侣暴力与伴侣敌意感知。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Marie-Ève Daspe,Marianne Emond,Brenda Ramos,Audrey Brassard,Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel
{"title":"青年夫妻冲突中亲密伴侣暴力与伴侣敌意感知。","authors":"Marie-Ève Daspe,Marianne Emond,Brenda Ramos,Audrey Brassard,Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel","doi":"10.1177/08862605251338790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Romantic partners can be both accurate and biased in their perception of each other's hostile behaviors. In perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), documented deficits in social cognition and hostile attributions could contribute to greater biases. The current study used the truth and bias model to examine accuracy and bias in perception of the partner's hostility during a conflict discussion among young adult couples, and the role of IPV perpetration and victimization in this perception. Young adult couples (n = 178) engaged in a video-recorded conflict discussion. Using a video-recall task, participants rated their own and their partner's hostility every 30 s of the discussion. Results of truth and bias analyses revealed that individuals accurately tracked fluctuations in their partner hostility (i.e., tracking accuracy) during the conflict discussion, but perceived their partner as more hostile when they themselves felt more hostile (i.e., projection). Regarding the role of IPV perpetration, physically violent individuals showed greater projection and sexually violent individuals overestimated (i.e., directional bias) their partner's hostility during the conflict discussion compared to nonviolent individuals. Regarding IPV victimization, individuals who experienced higher levels of psychological IPV overestimated their partner's hostility and showed greater tracking accuracy compared with individuals who experienced lower levels of psychological IPV. Victims of physical IPV showed greater tracking accuracy and lower projection than nonvictims. Victims of sexual IPV underestimated their partner's hostility and evidenced poorer tracking accuracy than nonvictims. These findings contribute to understand social information processing during conflict among young adult couples, according to their experience of violence.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"32 1","pages":"8862605251338790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intimate Partner Violence and Perception of Partner Hostility During Conflict Among Young Adult Couples.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Ève Daspe,Marianne Emond,Brenda Ramos,Audrey Brassard,Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251338790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Romantic partners can be both accurate and biased in their perception of each other's hostile behaviors. In perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), documented deficits in social cognition and hostile attributions could contribute to greater biases. The current study used the truth and bias model to examine accuracy and bias in perception of the partner's hostility during a conflict discussion among young adult couples, and the role of IPV perpetration and victimization in this perception. Young adult couples (n = 178) engaged in a video-recorded conflict discussion. Using a video-recall task, participants rated their own and their partner's hostility every 30 s of the discussion. Results of truth and bias analyses revealed that individuals accurately tracked fluctuations in their partner hostility (i.e., tracking accuracy) during the conflict discussion, but perceived their partner as more hostile when they themselves felt more hostile (i.e., projection). Regarding the role of IPV perpetration, physically violent individuals showed greater projection and sexually violent individuals overestimated (i.e., directional bias) their partner's hostility during the conflict discussion compared to nonviolent individuals. Regarding IPV victimization, individuals who experienced higher levels of psychological IPV overestimated their partner's hostility and showed greater tracking accuracy compared with individuals who experienced lower levels of psychological IPV. Victims of physical IPV showed greater tracking accuracy and lower projection than nonvictims. Victims of sexual IPV underestimated their partner's hostility and evidenced poorer tracking accuracy than nonvictims. These findings contribute to understand social information processing during conflict among young adult couples, according to their experience of violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"8862605251338790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251338790\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251338790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浪漫的伴侣对彼此敌对行为的看法可能既准确又有偏见。在亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的施暴者和受害者中,记录在案的社会认知缺陷和敌意归因可能导致更大的偏见。本研究使用真相与偏见模型来检验年轻成年夫妇在冲突讨论中对伴侣敌意感知的准确性和偏见,以及IPV的实施和受害在这种感知中的作用。年轻的成年夫妇(n = 178)参与了一段视频记录的冲突讨论。通过视频回忆任务,参与者每隔30秒对自己和伴侣的敌意进行评分。真相和偏见分析的结果显示,在冲突讨论期间,个人准确地跟踪了伴侣敌意的波动(即跟踪准确性),但当他们自己感到更有敌意时(即投射),他们认为伴侣更有敌意。在IPV实施的作用方面,身体暴力个体在冲突讨论中表现出更大的投射,性暴力个体在冲突讨论中表现出对伴侣敌意的高估(即方向性偏见)。在IPV受害方面,与心理IPV水平较低的个体相比,心理IPV水平较高的个体高估了伴侣的敌意,并表现出更高的跟踪准确性。物理IPV的受害者比非受害者表现出更高的跟踪准确性和更低的投影。性IPV的受害者低估了他们伴侣的敌意,并且证明了比非受害者更差的追踪准确性。这些发现有助于理解年轻成年夫妇在冲突中根据他们的暴力经历处理社会信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intimate Partner Violence and Perception of Partner Hostility During Conflict Among Young Adult Couples.
Romantic partners can be both accurate and biased in their perception of each other's hostile behaviors. In perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), documented deficits in social cognition and hostile attributions could contribute to greater biases. The current study used the truth and bias model to examine accuracy and bias in perception of the partner's hostility during a conflict discussion among young adult couples, and the role of IPV perpetration and victimization in this perception. Young adult couples (n = 178) engaged in a video-recorded conflict discussion. Using a video-recall task, participants rated their own and their partner's hostility every 30 s of the discussion. Results of truth and bias analyses revealed that individuals accurately tracked fluctuations in their partner hostility (i.e., tracking accuracy) during the conflict discussion, but perceived their partner as more hostile when they themselves felt more hostile (i.e., projection). Regarding the role of IPV perpetration, physically violent individuals showed greater projection and sexually violent individuals overestimated (i.e., directional bias) their partner's hostility during the conflict discussion compared to nonviolent individuals. Regarding IPV victimization, individuals who experienced higher levels of psychological IPV overestimated their partner's hostility and showed greater tracking accuracy compared with individuals who experienced lower levels of psychological IPV. Victims of physical IPV showed greater tracking accuracy and lower projection than nonvictims. Victims of sexual IPV underestimated their partner's hostility and evidenced poorer tracking accuracy than nonvictims. These findings contribute to understand social information processing during conflict among young adult couples, according to their experience of violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信