鼓膜造瘘管对儿童耳声发射检测的影响。

IF 0.7
Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Amy Du, Erin Kelly, David Mandell
{"title":"鼓膜造瘘管对儿童耳声发射检测的影响。","authors":"Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Amy Du, Erin Kelly, David Mandell","doi":"10.1177/01455613251343734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluate the impact of patent tympanostomy tubes (TT) on otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in patients with normal pure tone audiometry (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients who underwent TT placement with paired postoperative audiogram and OAEs at 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz were included. Frequencies with PTA >20 dB or nonpatent TTs were excluded. OAEs were graded by signal-to-noise ratio and distortion product as \"present,\" \"reduced,\" or \"absent.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 124 patients (217 ears) were included with a mean age (SD) of 3.9 (3.2) years and OAE testing occurring 4.5 (4.7) months postoperatively. OAE absence rates were 85% at 1 kHz (n = 165), 57% at 2 kHz (n = 203), 56% at 4 kHz (n = 206), and 83% at 8 kHz (n = 135).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absent OAEs were the most common result at all frequencies, especially 1 and 8 kHz. Overall, 78.8% of patients failed at least one tested frequency, despite normal PTA and patent TTs, suggesting a potential direct impact of TTs on OAE outcomes. Clinicians may need to exercise caution when interpreting OAEs in patients with patent TTs, and further research may warrant a reevaluation of OAE utility in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251343734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Tympanostomy Tubes on Pediatric Otoacoustic Emission Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Avraham E Adelman, Akshay Tangutur, Amy Du, Erin Kelly, David Mandell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613251343734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluate the impact of patent tympanostomy tubes (TT) on otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in patients with normal pure tone audiometry (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients who underwent TT placement with paired postoperative audiogram and OAEs at 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz were included. Frequencies with PTA >20 dB or nonpatent TTs were excluded. OAEs were graded by signal-to-noise ratio and distortion product as \\\"present,\\\" \\\"reduced,\\\" or \\\"absent.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 124 patients (217 ears) were included with a mean age (SD) of 3.9 (3.2) years and OAE testing occurring 4.5 (4.7) months postoperatively. OAE absence rates were 85% at 1 kHz (n = 165), 57% at 2 kHz (n = 203), 56% at 4 kHz (n = 206), and 83% at 8 kHz (n = 135).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absent OAEs were the most common result at all frequencies, especially 1 and 8 kHz. Overall, 78.8% of patients failed at least one tested frequency, despite normal PTA and patent TTs, suggesting a potential direct impact of TTs on OAE outcomes. Clinicians may need to exercise caution when interpreting OAEs in patients with patent TTs, and further research may warrant a reevaluation of OAE utility in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613251343734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251343734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251343734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评价未闭鼓室造瘘管(TT)对正常纯音听力学(PTA)患者耳声发射(OAE)的影响。方法:回顾性分析接受TT放置的患者的术后听图和1、2、4和8 kHz的oae。排除了PTA小于20 dB或非专利tt的频率。根据信噪比和失真积将oae分为“存在”、“减少”或“不存在”。结果:共纳入124例患者(217耳),平均年龄(SD)为3.9(3.2)岁,术后4.5(4.7)个月进行OAE检测。1 kHz时OAE缺失率为85% (n = 165), 2 kHz时为57% (n = 203), 4 kHz时为56% (n = 206), 8 kHz时为83% (n = 135)。结论:以1 kHz和8 kHz为最常见的频率为无声发射。总体而言,78.8%的患者尽管有正常的PTA和专利的TTs,但至少有一个测试频率失败,这表明TTs对OAE结果有潜在的直接影响。临床医生在解释专利TTs患者的OAE时可能需要谨慎,进一步的研究可能需要在这种情况下重新评估OAE的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Tympanostomy Tubes on Pediatric Otoacoustic Emission Testing.

Background: Evaluate the impact of patent tympanostomy tubes (TT) on otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in patients with normal pure tone audiometry (PTA).

Methods: Retrospective review of patients who underwent TT placement with paired postoperative audiogram and OAEs at 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz were included. Frequencies with PTA >20 dB or nonpatent TTs were excluded. OAEs were graded by signal-to-noise ratio and distortion product as "present," "reduced," or "absent."

Results: In total, 124 patients (217 ears) were included with a mean age (SD) of 3.9 (3.2) years and OAE testing occurring 4.5 (4.7) months postoperatively. OAE absence rates were 85% at 1 kHz (n = 165), 57% at 2 kHz (n = 203), 56% at 4 kHz (n = 206), and 83% at 8 kHz (n = 135).

Conclusion: Absent OAEs were the most common result at all frequencies, especially 1 and 8 kHz. Overall, 78.8% of patients failed at least one tested frequency, despite normal PTA and patent TTs, suggesting a potential direct impact of TTs on OAE outcomes. Clinicians may need to exercise caution when interpreting OAEs in patients with patent TTs, and further research may warrant a reevaluation of OAE utility in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信