不同鼓室内糖皮质激素治疗特发性SSNHL的应用方法回顾性分析:一项比较结果研究。

IF 2.2
C Schmit, F Keller, T Gottfried, M Santer, A Tröger, M Kloppenburg, J Klarer, A Stenzl, J Schmutzhard, B Hofauer, D Dejaco
{"title":"不同鼓室内糖皮质激素治疗特发性SSNHL的应用方法回顾性分析:一项比较结果研究。","authors":"C Schmit, F Keller, T Gottfried, M Santer, A Tröger, M Kloppenburg, J Klarer, A Stenzl, J Schmutzhard, B Hofauer, D Dejaco","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09432-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glucocorticoids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be administered systemically or via intratympanic injection. This study evaluates the impact of different intratympanic injection techniques on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL (January 2008-May 2023). Patients were grouped by application technique: (1) transtympanic injection under local anesthesia (TI), (2) CO<sub>2</sub> laser paracentesis under general anesthesia (LP), and (3) VT application under general anesthesia (VT). Primary outcomes included hearing improvement and tympanic membrane perforation closure time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 99 patients: 28 with TI, 34 with VT, and 37 with LP. Groups showed no significant differences in sex, affected side, therapy initiation interval, pretreatment type, preoperative BCPTA4, subjective improvement, or treatment-related pain (all p > 0.1). Hearing thresholds improved significantly in the LP and VT groups with large (d = 0.832, p < 0.001) and medium (d = 0.513, p = 0.01) effect sizes, respectively, but not in the TI group (d = 0.294, p = 0.137). Tympanic membrane closure time differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LP and VT significantly improved hearing thresholds in SSNHL patients. LP demonstrated the highest efficacy, consistent results across SSNHL severities, and the fastest tympanic membrane closure, making it the preferred method.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of different application methods in intratympanic glucocorticoid therapy for treatment of idiopathic SSNHL: A comparative outcome study.\",\"authors\":\"C Schmit, F Keller, T Gottfried, M Santer, A Tröger, M Kloppenburg, J Klarer, A Stenzl, J Schmutzhard, B Hofauer, D Dejaco\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09432-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glucocorticoids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be administered systemically or via intratympanic injection. This study evaluates the impact of different intratympanic injection techniques on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL (January 2008-May 2023). Patients were grouped by application technique: (1) transtympanic injection under local anesthesia (TI), (2) CO<sub>2</sub> laser paracentesis under general anesthesia (LP), and (3) VT application under general anesthesia (VT). Primary outcomes included hearing improvement and tympanic membrane perforation closure time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 99 patients: 28 with TI, 34 with VT, and 37 with LP. Groups showed no significant differences in sex, affected side, therapy initiation interval, pretreatment type, preoperative BCPTA4, subjective improvement, or treatment-related pain (all p > 0.1). Hearing thresholds improved significantly in the LP and VT groups with large (d = 0.832, p < 0.001) and medium (d = 0.513, p = 0.01) effect sizes, respectively, but not in the TI group (d = 0.294, p = 0.137). Tympanic membrane closure time differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LP and VT significantly improved hearing thresholds in SSNHL patients. LP demonstrated the highest efficacy, consistent results across SSNHL severities, and the fastest tympanic membrane closure, making it the preferred method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09432-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09432-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖皮质激素治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)可全身或鼓内注射。本研究评估不同鼓室内注射技术对患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2023年5月诊断为特发性SSNHL的患者。按应用技术分组:(1)局麻下经鼓室注射(TI),(2)全身麻醉下CO2激光穿刺(LP),(3)全身麻醉下应用VT (VT)。主要结果包括听力改善和鼓膜穿孔闭合时间。结果:本研究纳入99例患者:TI 28例,VT 34例,LP 37例。各组在性别、受病侧、治疗起始间隔、预处理类型、术前BCPTA4、主观改善或治疗相关疼痛方面无显著差异(均p < 0.01)。LP组和VT组的听力阈值均有显著改善(d = 0.832, p)。结论:LP组和VT组的听力阈值均有显著改善。LP的疗效最高,不同严重程度的SSNHL疗效一致,且鼓膜愈合速度最快,是首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective analysis of different application methods in intratympanic glucocorticoid therapy for treatment of idiopathic SSNHL: A comparative outcome study.

Purpose: Glucocorticoids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be administered systemically or via intratympanic injection. This study evaluates the impact of different intratympanic injection techniques on patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL (January 2008-May 2023). Patients were grouped by application technique: (1) transtympanic injection under local anesthesia (TI), (2) CO2 laser paracentesis under general anesthesia (LP), and (3) VT application under general anesthesia (VT). Primary outcomes included hearing improvement and tympanic membrane perforation closure time.

Results: The study included 99 patients: 28 with TI, 34 with VT, and 37 with LP. Groups showed no significant differences in sex, affected side, therapy initiation interval, pretreatment type, preoperative BCPTA4, subjective improvement, or treatment-related pain (all p > 0.1). Hearing thresholds improved significantly in the LP and VT groups with large (d = 0.832, p < 0.001) and medium (d = 0.513, p = 0.01) effect sizes, respectively, but not in the TI group (d = 0.294, p = 0.137). Tympanic membrane closure time differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: LP and VT significantly improved hearing thresholds in SSNHL patients. LP demonstrated the highest efficacy, consistent results across SSNHL severities, and the fastest tympanic membrane closure, making it the preferred method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信