高血压患者心室复极分析:夜间血压下降的影响。

Marco Aurélio Goulart, Dalmo Antonio Ribeiro Moreira, Fernando Yue Cesena, Jonathan Batista Souza, Antonio Gabriele Laurinavicius, Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo, Márcio Gonçalves de Sousa
{"title":"高血压患者心室复极分析:夜间血压下降的影响。","authors":"Marco Aurélio Goulart, Dalmo Antonio Ribeiro Moreira, Fernando Yue Cesena, Jonathan Batista Souza, Antonio Gabriele Laurinavicius, Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo, Márcio Gonçalves de Sousa","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in ventricular repolarization are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and higher mortality. The association between a non-dipper blood pressure pattern and changes in ventricular repolarization remains controversial. This study sought to compare ventricular repolarization measurements (QT interval, QTc, Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT, and QTd) in hypertensive dippers and non-dippers. Secondary objectives are to compare measurements between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients, as well as resistant and non-resistant hypertensive patients. This observational, cross-sectional study involved patients monitored in a Hypertension Service. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. A total of 130 participants were admitted. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 72% presenting some form of target organ damage. Repolarization measurements did not differ between dippers and non-dippers. However, within the resistant hypertension group, when compared to the non-resistant, differences were observed in the QT interval in V5 (433.3 ms vs. 420.9 ms, p = 0.046), Tp-Te in both V2 (85.4 ms vs. 78.7 ms, p = 0.049) and V5 (84.6 ms vs. 74.6 ms, p = 0.006), Tp-Te/QT in V5 (0.19 vs. 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon index (18.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.011), and Cornell index (14.2 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.002), aged-adjusted values. In this high cardiovascular risk hypertensive population, no difference in repolarization measures was found between dippers and non-dippers. However, this is the first study to demonstrate increased ventricular repolarization measures in patients with resistant hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 4","pages":"e20240725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients: Influence of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Aurélio Goulart, Dalmo Antonio Ribeiro Moreira, Fernando Yue Cesena, Jonathan Batista Souza, Antonio Gabriele Laurinavicius, Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo, Márcio Gonçalves de Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.36660/abc.20240725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Changes in ventricular repolarization are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and higher mortality. The association between a non-dipper blood pressure pattern and changes in ventricular repolarization remains controversial. This study sought to compare ventricular repolarization measurements (QT interval, QTc, Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT, and QTd) in hypertensive dippers and non-dippers. Secondary objectives are to compare measurements between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients, as well as resistant and non-resistant hypertensive patients. This observational, cross-sectional study involved patients monitored in a Hypertension Service. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. A total of 130 participants were admitted. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 72% presenting some form of target organ damage. Repolarization measurements did not differ between dippers and non-dippers. However, within the resistant hypertension group, when compared to the non-resistant, differences were observed in the QT interval in V5 (433.3 ms vs. 420.9 ms, p = 0.046), Tp-Te in both V2 (85.4 ms vs. 78.7 ms, p = 0.049) and V5 (84.6 ms vs. 74.6 ms, p = 0.006), Tp-Te/QT in V5 (0.19 vs. 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon index (18.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.011), and Cornell index (14.2 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.002), aged-adjusted values. In this high cardiovascular risk hypertensive population, no difference in repolarization measures was found between dippers and non-dippers. However, this is the first study to demonstrate increased ventricular repolarization measures in patients with resistant hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"122 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12108120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心室复极的改变与室性心律失常和较高的死亡率有关。非倾角血压模式与心室复极变化之间的关系仍然存在争议。本研究旨在比较高血压患者和非高血压患者的心室复极测量(QT间期、QTc、Tp-Te、Tp-Te/QT和QTd)。次要目的是比较控制和不控制的高血压患者,以及抵抗性和非抵抗性高血压患者之间的测量结果。这项观察性的横断面研究涉及在高血压服务中心监测的患者。统计学分析采用显著性水平为5%。共接纳130名参加者。平均年龄为67.4岁,72%表现出某种形式的靶器官损伤。复极化测量在浸液者和非浸液者之间没有差异。然而,在抗高血压组,与抗药相比,差异在QT间隔在V5中(433.3 vs 420.9女士,女士p = 0.046), Tp-Te在V2 (85.4 vs 78.7毫秒女士,p = 0.049)和5 (84.6 vs 74.6女士,女士p = 0.006), Tp-Te / QT V5 (0.19 vs 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon指数(18.8毫米和15.7毫米,p = 0.011),和康奈尔指数(14.2毫米和11.2毫米,p = 0.002), aged-adjusted值。在这一心血管高危高血压人群中,翻尿者和非翻尿者在复极测量上没有发现差异。然而,这是第一个证明顽固性高血压患者心室复极增加的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients: Influence of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping.

Changes in ventricular repolarization are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and higher mortality. The association between a non-dipper blood pressure pattern and changes in ventricular repolarization remains controversial. This study sought to compare ventricular repolarization measurements (QT interval, QTc, Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT, and QTd) in hypertensive dippers and non-dippers. Secondary objectives are to compare measurements between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients, as well as resistant and non-resistant hypertensive patients. This observational, cross-sectional study involved patients monitored in a Hypertension Service. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. A total of 130 participants were admitted. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 72% presenting some form of target organ damage. Repolarization measurements did not differ between dippers and non-dippers. However, within the resistant hypertension group, when compared to the non-resistant, differences were observed in the QT interval in V5 (433.3 ms vs. 420.9 ms, p = 0.046), Tp-Te in both V2 (85.4 ms vs. 78.7 ms, p = 0.049) and V5 (84.6 ms vs. 74.6 ms, p = 0.006), Tp-Te/QT in V5 (0.19 vs. 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon index (18.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.011), and Cornell index (14.2 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.002), aged-adjusted values. In this high cardiovascular risk hypertensive population, no difference in repolarization measures was found between dippers and non-dippers. However, this is the first study to demonstrate increased ventricular repolarization measures in patients with resistant hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信