提供者在成功的自主呼吸试验后持续延迟拔管:一项回顾性队列研究。

Anna K Barker, Rachel K Hechtman, Megan Acho, Michael W Sjoding
{"title":"提供者在成功的自主呼吸试验后持续延迟拔管:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Anna K Barker, Rachel K Hechtman, Megan Acho, Michael W Sjoding","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-188OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Many patients who pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) are not extubated, leaving them at risk for life-threatening ventilator-associated complications. Determining barriers to timely extubation may facilitate shorter overall durations of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the patient-related and patient-independent barriers to timely extubation within 6 hours of passing an SBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health record data from adult patients on mechanical ventilation admitted to a medical or cardiac intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary-care center between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2023. We utilized a mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the association between timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT and fifteen potential reasons to delay extubation, accounting for clustering at the attending physician level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,240 patients, 62.3% underwent timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT. Patients with delayed extubation experienced a median of 2.0 [IQR: 1.0-3.8] additional days on mechanical ventilation after passing an SBT, for a total of 3,930 days. This delay accounts for 32% of the total time on mechanical ventilation for the study population. Patients were less likely to have timely extubation if they underwent a procedure in the 24 hours after passing an SBT (average marginal effect [AME] -17.7%, 95% CI:-29.2 to -6.3), had lower levels of consciousness (AME -16.5%, 95% CI:-23.2 to -10.0), were on low (AME -12.9%, 95% CI:-19.2 to -4.8), or high dose vasopressors (AME -12.2%, 95% CI:-17.8 to -8.1), or had copious secretions (AME -8.7%, 95% CI:-13.3 to -4.1). However, 55% of patients with delayed extubation experienced none of these top five potential barriers. There was minimal physician variability in the decision to extubate after a successful SBT (median odds ratio: 1.10, 95% CI:1.02-1.78). The most frequent reason documented by respiratory therapists for not extubating a patient after passing an SBT was attending preference (43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in 3 patients remain on mechanical ventilation after passing their first SBT, with over half lacking an identifiable barrier to extubation. Future work should be pursued to address this, including consideration of unit-wide interventions to increase timely extubation attempts among patients without contraindications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providers Consistently Delay Extubation After Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trials: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna K Barker, Rachel K Hechtman, Megan Acho, Michael W Sjoding\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-188OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Many patients who pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) are not extubated, leaving them at risk for life-threatening ventilator-associated complications. Determining barriers to timely extubation may facilitate shorter overall durations of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the patient-related and patient-independent barriers to timely extubation within 6 hours of passing an SBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health record data from adult patients on mechanical ventilation admitted to a medical or cardiac intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary-care center between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2023. We utilized a mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the association between timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT and fifteen potential reasons to delay extubation, accounting for clustering at the attending physician level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,240 patients, 62.3% underwent timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT. Patients with delayed extubation experienced a median of 2.0 [IQR: 1.0-3.8] additional days on mechanical ventilation after passing an SBT, for a total of 3,930 days. This delay accounts for 32% of the total time on mechanical ventilation for the study population. Patients were less likely to have timely extubation if they underwent a procedure in the 24 hours after passing an SBT (average marginal effect [AME] -17.7%, 95% CI:-29.2 to -6.3), had lower levels of consciousness (AME -16.5%, 95% CI:-23.2 to -10.0), were on low (AME -12.9%, 95% CI:-19.2 to -4.8), or high dose vasopressors (AME -12.2%, 95% CI:-17.8 to -8.1), or had copious secretions (AME -8.7%, 95% CI:-13.3 to -4.1). However, 55% of patients with delayed extubation experienced none of these top five potential barriers. There was minimal physician variability in the decision to extubate after a successful SBT (median odds ratio: 1.10, 95% CI:1.02-1.78). The most frequent reason documented by respiratory therapists for not extubating a patient after passing an SBT was attending preference (43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in 3 patients remain on mechanical ventilation after passing their first SBT, with over half lacking an identifiable barrier to extubation. Future work should be pursued to address this, including consideration of unit-wide interventions to increase timely extubation attempts among patients without contraindications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-188OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-188OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:许多通过自主呼吸试验(SBT)的患者没有拔管,使他们面临危及生命的呼吸机相关并发症的风险。确定及时拔管的障碍可能有助于缩短机械通气的总持续时间。目的:确定通过SBT后6小时内患者相关和患者独立的及时拔管障碍。方法:我们分析了2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在一家学术三级护理中心的内科或心脏重症监护病房接受机械通气的成年患者的电子健康记录数据。我们使用混合效应多变量logistic回归模型来评估首次通过SBT后6小时内及时拔管与延迟拔管的15个潜在原因之间的关系,并考虑到主治医生水平的聚类。结果:在3240例患者中,62.3%的患者在首次通过SBT后6小时内及时拔管。延迟拔管的患者在通过SBT后机械通气的平均时间为2.0 [IQR: 1.0-3.8]天,总计3,930天。这种延迟占研究人群机械通气总时间的32%。如果患者在SBT通过后24小时内接受手术,患者及时拔管的可能性较小(平均边际效应[AME] -17.7%, 95% CI:-29.2至-6.3),意识水平较低(AME -16.5%, 95% CI:-23.2至-10.0),低(AME -12.9%, 95% CI:-19.2至-4.8)或高剂量血管加压药(AME -12.2%, 95% CI:-17.8至-8.1),或有大量分泌物(AME -8.7%, 95% CI:-13.3至-4.1)。然而,55%的延迟拔管患者没有经历这五大潜在障碍。在SBT成功后,医生在拔管决定上的差异很小(中位优势比:1.10,95% CI:1.02-1.78)。呼吸治疗师记录的患者通过SBT后不拔管的最常见原因是就诊偏好(43%)。结论:三分之一的患者在通过第一次SBT后仍然使用机械通气,超过一半的患者缺乏可识别的拔管屏障。未来的工作应继续解决这一问题,包括考虑全单位范围的干预措施,以增加无禁忌症患者及时拔管的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providers Consistently Delay Extubation After Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trials: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Rationale: Many patients who pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) are not extubated, leaving them at risk for life-threatening ventilator-associated complications. Determining barriers to timely extubation may facilitate shorter overall durations of mechanical ventilation.

Objectives: To identify the patient-related and patient-independent barriers to timely extubation within 6 hours of passing an SBT.

Methods: We analyzed electronic health record data from adult patients on mechanical ventilation admitted to a medical or cardiac intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary-care center between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2023. We utilized a mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the association between timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT and fifteen potential reasons to delay extubation, accounting for clustering at the attending physician level.

Results: Among 3,240 patients, 62.3% underwent timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT. Patients with delayed extubation experienced a median of 2.0 [IQR: 1.0-3.8] additional days on mechanical ventilation after passing an SBT, for a total of 3,930 days. This delay accounts for 32% of the total time on mechanical ventilation for the study population. Patients were less likely to have timely extubation if they underwent a procedure in the 24 hours after passing an SBT (average marginal effect [AME] -17.7%, 95% CI:-29.2 to -6.3), had lower levels of consciousness (AME -16.5%, 95% CI:-23.2 to -10.0), were on low (AME -12.9%, 95% CI:-19.2 to -4.8), or high dose vasopressors (AME -12.2%, 95% CI:-17.8 to -8.1), or had copious secretions (AME -8.7%, 95% CI:-13.3 to -4.1). However, 55% of patients with delayed extubation experienced none of these top five potential barriers. There was minimal physician variability in the decision to extubate after a successful SBT (median odds ratio: 1.10, 95% CI:1.02-1.78). The most frequent reason documented by respiratory therapists for not extubating a patient after passing an SBT was attending preference (43%).

Conclusions: One in 3 patients remain on mechanical ventilation after passing their first SBT, with over half lacking an identifiable barrier to extubation. Future work should be pursued to address this, including consideration of unit-wide interventions to increase timely extubation attempts among patients without contraindications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信