点塞治疗干眼症的有效性和安全性如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan
{"title":"点塞治疗干眼症的有效性和安全性如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial condition characterized by tear film instability and ocular discomfort, often treated with punctal plugs to enhance tear retention. Despite their widespread use, the efficacy, safety, and retention profiles of punctal plugs require comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and safety of punctal plugs in managing DED, focusing on tear film stability, tear production, symptom relief, ocular surface integrity, and plug retention rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024559417). The search strategy included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published up to January 2025, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Eligible studies involved adults with DED treated with punctal plugs, reporting outcomes such as tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, fluorescein and Rose Bengal staining, and retention rates. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity (I2 statistic). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs) tools, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (1,658patients) were included. Punctal plugs significantly improved TBUT (mean difference (MD): 1.8 s; 95 % CI: 1.8-1.9; p < 0.001), Schirmer's test scores (MD: 3.1 mm; 95 % CI: 3.1-3.2; p < 0.001), OSDI scores (MD: -20.6; 95 % CI: -21.3 to -19.9; p < 0.001), fluorescein staining (MD: -1.79; 95 % CI: -1.82 to -1.76; p < 0.001), and Rose Bengal staining (MD: -0.7; 95 % CI: -0.79 to -0.67; p < 0.001). Retention rates were high of 86 % (logit: 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.62-1.94) with smart plug showing high retention of 97.3 %. Heterogeneity was low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0-24.1 %) across most outcomes. Evidence was moderate to high, supported by RCTs, though some cohort studies exhibited moderate bias in confounding, selection, and outcome measurement. Publication bias was minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Punctal plugs are an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe DED, significantly improving tear film stability, tear production, symptoms, and ocular surface health, with high retention rates. Low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias strengthen these findings, though moderate bias in some non-RCTs suggests caution. Future research should refine plug designs and address methodological limitations to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102438"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How effective and safe are punctal plugs in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial condition characterized by tear film instability and ocular discomfort, often treated with punctal plugs to enhance tear retention. Despite their widespread use, the efficacy, safety, and retention profiles of punctal plugs require comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and safety of punctal plugs in managing DED, focusing on tear film stability, tear production, symptom relief, ocular surface integrity, and plug retention rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024559417). The search strategy included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published up to January 2025, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Eligible studies involved adults with DED treated with punctal plugs, reporting outcomes such as tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, fluorescein and Rose Bengal staining, and retention rates. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity (I2 statistic). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs) tools, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (1,658patients) were included. Punctal plugs significantly improved TBUT (mean difference (MD): 1.8 s; 95 % CI: 1.8-1.9; p < 0.001), Schirmer's test scores (MD: 3.1 mm; 95 % CI: 3.1-3.2; p < 0.001), OSDI scores (MD: -20.6; 95 % CI: -21.3 to -19.9; p < 0.001), fluorescein staining (MD: -1.79; 95 % CI: -1.82 to -1.76; p < 0.001), and Rose Bengal staining (MD: -0.7; 95 % CI: -0.79 to -0.67; p < 0.001). Retention rates were high of 86 % (logit: 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.62-1.94) with smart plug showing high retention of 97.3 %. Heterogeneity was low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0-24.1 %) across most outcomes. Evidence was moderate to high, supported by RCTs, though some cohort studies exhibited moderate bias in confounding, selection, and outcome measurement. Publication bias was minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Punctal plugs are an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe DED, significantly improving tear film stability, tear production, symptoms, and ocular surface health, with high retention rates. Low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias strengthen these findings, though moderate bias in some non-RCTs suggests caution. Future research should refine plug designs and address methodological limitations to optimize outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102438\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:干眼病(DED)是一种常见的多因素疾病,以泪膜不稳定和眼部不适为特征,通常采用点塞治疗以增强泪液潴留。尽管其广泛应用,但其有效性、安全性和固位情况仍需全面评估。目的:评估点状眼塞治疗DED的有效性和安全性,重点关注泪膜稳定性、泪液产生、症状缓解、眼表完整性和眼塞保留率。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024559417)。检索策略包括PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase,检索截至2025年1月发表的研究,包括随机对照试验(RCTs)和队列研究。符合条件的研究包括接受点塞治疗的DED成人,报告泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、Schirmer试验、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分、荧光素和玫瑰孟加拉染色以及滞留率等结果。采用基于异质性的固定效应或随机效应模型合并数据(I2统计量)。使用Cochrane RoB2 (rct)和ROBINS-I(非rct)工具评估偏倚风险,使用Begg's和Egger's检验评估发表偏倚。结果:纳入17项研究(1,658例患者)。点塞显著改善TBUT (mean difference (MD): 1.8 s;95% ci: 1.8-1.9;P 2 = 0- 24.1%)。虽然一些队列研究在混杂、选择和结果测量方面表现出中度偏倚,但rct支持的证据从中到高。发表偏倚最小。结论:点状眼塞治疗中重度DED有效且安全,可显著改善泪膜稳定性、泪液生成、症状和眼表健康,且保留率高。低异质性和最小的发表偏倚强化了这些发现,尽管在一些非随机对照试验中存在中度偏倚,但仍需谨慎。未来的研究应该改进桥塞设计,解决方法上的限制,以优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How effective and safe are punctal plugs in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial condition characterized by tear film instability and ocular discomfort, often treated with punctal plugs to enhance tear retention. Despite their widespread use, the efficacy, safety, and retention profiles of punctal plugs require comprehensive evaluation.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of punctal plugs in managing DED, focusing on tear film stability, tear production, symptom relief, ocular surface integrity, and plug retention rates.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024559417). The search strategy included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published up to January 2025, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Eligible studies involved adults with DED treated with punctal plugs, reporting outcomes such as tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, fluorescein and Rose Bengal staining, and retention rates. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity (I2 statistic). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs) tools, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results: Seventeen studies (1,658patients) were included. Punctal plugs significantly improved TBUT (mean difference (MD): 1.8 s; 95 % CI: 1.8-1.9; p < 0.001), Schirmer's test scores (MD: 3.1 mm; 95 % CI: 3.1-3.2; p < 0.001), OSDI scores (MD: -20.6; 95 % CI: -21.3 to -19.9; p < 0.001), fluorescein staining (MD: -1.79; 95 % CI: -1.82 to -1.76; p < 0.001), and Rose Bengal staining (MD: -0.7; 95 % CI: -0.79 to -0.67; p < 0.001). Retention rates were high of 86 % (logit: 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.62-1.94) with smart plug showing high retention of 97.3 %. Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0-24.1 %) across most outcomes. Evidence was moderate to high, supported by RCTs, though some cohort studies exhibited moderate bias in confounding, selection, and outcome measurement. Publication bias was minimal.

Conclusions: Punctal plugs are an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe DED, significantly improving tear film stability, tear production, symptoms, and ocular surface health, with high retention rates. Low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias strengthen these findings, though moderate bias in some non-RCTs suggests caution. Future research should refine plug designs and address methodological limitations to optimize outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信