如何在全科实践中实现可持续性:在丹麦全科医生中进行定性分析的研讨会经验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sigrid Moesgaard Larsen, Nanna Holt Jessen, Bolette Friederichsen, John Brandt Brodersen, Ásthildur Árnadóttir
{"title":"如何在全科实践中实现可持续性:在丹麦全科医生中进行定性分析的研讨会经验。","authors":"Sigrid Moesgaard Larsen, Nanna Holt Jessen, Bolette Friederichsen, John Brandt Brodersen, Ásthildur Árnadóttir","doi":"10.1177/14034948251333003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare systems are experiencing complex interconnected problems, such as rising health inequalities, climate change threats to human and planetary health, environmental and patient harm through defensive medical care, overdiagnosis, overuse, and overtreatment, population ageing, higher prevalence of multimorbidity, and professional shortage and burnout. This calls for sustainable solutions in healthcare. This article presents bottom-up suggestions from general practitioners (GPs) for sustainable solutions at the clinical level and identifies areas for support at the structural level framed within the concept of environmental, social and governance principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the annual meeting of the Danish College of General Practitioners, 55 GPs attended a workshop focussing on sustainability in general practice. The GPs were asked to actively contribute with their reflections on possible solutions to developing a more sustainable approach to the healthcare provided in general practice. Written responses were collected, analysed and categorised through an inductive analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshop resulted in 101 ideas on how to foster sustainable change and identified areas of support. Half of the ideas (<i>n</i> = 51) were sustainable solutions at the clinical level, whereas the other half (<i>n</i> = 50) concerned suggestions at the structural level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>The attendees articulated many suggestions for making Danish general practice more sustainable, both at the clinical level and at the structural level. Further research is needed to explore the potential of the presented ideas and gain higher cultural acceptance of prioritising sustainability in general practice.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251333003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to approach sustainability in general practice: a workshop experience with a qualitative analysis amongst general practitioners in Denmark.\",\"authors\":\"Sigrid Moesgaard Larsen, Nanna Holt Jessen, Bolette Friederichsen, John Brandt Brodersen, Ásthildur Árnadóttir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948251333003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare systems are experiencing complex interconnected problems, such as rising health inequalities, climate change threats to human and planetary health, environmental and patient harm through defensive medical care, overdiagnosis, overuse, and overtreatment, population ageing, higher prevalence of multimorbidity, and professional shortage and burnout. This calls for sustainable solutions in healthcare. This article presents bottom-up suggestions from general practitioners (GPs) for sustainable solutions at the clinical level and identifies areas for support at the structural level framed within the concept of environmental, social and governance principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the annual meeting of the Danish College of General Practitioners, 55 GPs attended a workshop focussing on sustainability in general practice. The GPs were asked to actively contribute with their reflections on possible solutions to developing a more sustainable approach to the healthcare provided in general practice. Written responses were collected, analysed and categorised through an inductive analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshop resulted in 101 ideas on how to foster sustainable change and identified areas of support. Half of the ideas (<i>n</i> = 51) were sustainable solutions at the clinical level, whereas the other half (<i>n</i> = 50) concerned suggestions at the structural level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>The attendees articulated many suggestions for making Danish general practice more sustainable, both at the clinical level and at the structural level. Further research is needed to explore the potential of the presented ideas and gain higher cultural acceptance of prioritising sustainability in general practice.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14034948251333003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251333003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251333003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生保健系统正在经历复杂的相互关联的问题,例如日益严重的卫生不平等,气候变化对人类和地球健康的威胁,防御性医疗保健对环境和患者的伤害,过度诊断,过度使用和过度治疗,人口老龄化,多种疾病的更高患病率,以及专业人员短缺和倦怠。这就需要医疗保健领域的可持续解决方案。本文提出了全科医生(gp)自下而上的建议,在临床层面上提供可持续的解决方案,并在环境、社会和治理原则的概念框架内确定了在结构层面上支持的领域。方法:在丹麦全科医生学院的年会上,55名全科医生参加了一个关于全科医生可持续性的研讨会。全科医生被要求积极贡献他们对可能的解决办法的思考,以制定一种更可持续的方法来提供一般医疗保健。通过归纳分析方法收集、分析和分类书面答复。结果:研讨会就如何促进可持续变革和确定支持领域产生了101个想法。其中一半(n = 51)是临床层面的可持续解决方案,另一半(n = 50)是结构层面的建议。结论:与会者明确提出了许多建议,使丹麦全科实践在临床水平和结构水平上更具可持续性。需要进一步的研究来探索所提出的想法的潜力,并在一般实践中获得优先考虑可持续性的更高文化接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to approach sustainability in general practice: a workshop experience with a qualitative analysis amongst general practitioners in Denmark.

Introduction: Healthcare systems are experiencing complex interconnected problems, such as rising health inequalities, climate change threats to human and planetary health, environmental and patient harm through defensive medical care, overdiagnosis, overuse, and overtreatment, population ageing, higher prevalence of multimorbidity, and professional shortage and burnout. This calls for sustainable solutions in healthcare. This article presents bottom-up suggestions from general practitioners (GPs) for sustainable solutions at the clinical level and identifies areas for support at the structural level framed within the concept of environmental, social and governance principles.

Methods: At the annual meeting of the Danish College of General Practitioners, 55 GPs attended a workshop focussing on sustainability in general practice. The GPs were asked to actively contribute with their reflections on possible solutions to developing a more sustainable approach to the healthcare provided in general practice. Written responses were collected, analysed and categorised through an inductive analysis approach.

Results: The workshop resulted in 101 ideas on how to foster sustainable change and identified areas of support. Half of the ideas (n = 51) were sustainable solutions at the clinical level, whereas the other half (n = 50) concerned suggestions at the structural level.

Conclusions: The attendees articulated many suggestions for making Danish general practice more sustainable, both at the clinical level and at the structural level. Further research is needed to explore the potential of the presented ideas and gain higher cultural acceptance of prioritising sustainability in general practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信