氟化二胺银与氟化钠清漆治疗初生磨牙近端龋的随机临床试验

IF 2.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Afsoon Motallebi, Ali Karimi, Fatemeh Mazhari, Melika Hoseinzadeh
{"title":"氟化二胺银与氟化钠清漆治疗初生磨牙近端龋的随机临床试验","authors":"Afsoon Motallebi, Ali Karimi, Fatemeh Mazhari, Melika Hoseinzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s44445-025-00012-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth design investigated the effectiveness of 30% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) compared to 5% sodium flouride varnish (NaD) in arresting proximal caries in the primary molars of preschool-aged children. Forty-three children with contralateral initial proximal carious lesions on primary molars were included. Caries status at the baseline was recorded using clinical and radiographic indices. Lesions restricted to the enamel or the exterior third of dentin were included. A sufficient space was created between the contacts using elastic separators. Then, 5% NaF varnish and 30% SDF were randomly applied to either side of the mouth. Six months later, bitewing radiographs were obtained, and the post-intervention caries scores were compared with the baseline radiographs. Children's oral hygiene was recorded via a questionnaire. The findings indicated that the baseline and post-intervention caries status were comparable between the groups. The success rate of the SDF treatment (74.4%) and the NaF varnish (67.5%) was comparable. Baseline radiographic caries status was significantly related to the treatment result in the NaF group (p = 0.047). Dental flossing was significantly associated with the treatment result when SDF was used (p = 0.027). In conclusion, both fluoride-containing materials exhibited comparable efficacy in arresting early proximal caries lesions in primary molars. SDF 30% showed a higher but insignificant success rate in arresting initial proximal lesions of the primary molar compared to NaF 5% varnish.Trial registration: IRCT, IRCT20220425054647N1. Registered on 24 September 2022, https://en.irct.ir/trial/63168 .</p>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"37 4-6","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silver diamine fluoride versus sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of proximal caries in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Afsoon Motallebi, Ali Karimi, Fatemeh Mazhari, Melika Hoseinzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44445-025-00012-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth design investigated the effectiveness of 30% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) compared to 5% sodium flouride varnish (NaD) in arresting proximal caries in the primary molars of preschool-aged children. Forty-three children with contralateral initial proximal carious lesions on primary molars were included. Caries status at the baseline was recorded using clinical and radiographic indices. Lesions restricted to the enamel or the exterior third of dentin were included. A sufficient space was created between the contacts using elastic separators. Then, 5% NaF varnish and 30% SDF were randomly applied to either side of the mouth. Six months later, bitewing radiographs were obtained, and the post-intervention caries scores were compared with the baseline radiographs. Children's oral hygiene was recorded via a questionnaire. The findings indicated that the baseline and post-intervention caries status were comparable between the groups. The success rate of the SDF treatment (74.4%) and the NaF varnish (67.5%) was comparable. Baseline radiographic caries status was significantly related to the treatment result in the NaF group (p = 0.047). Dental flossing was significantly associated with the treatment result when SDF was used (p = 0.027). In conclusion, both fluoride-containing materials exhibited comparable efficacy in arresting early proximal caries lesions in primary molars. SDF 30% showed a higher but insignificant success rate in arresting initial proximal lesions of the primary molar compared to NaF 5% varnish.Trial registration: IRCT, IRCT20220425054647N1. Registered on 24 September 2022, https://en.irct.ir/trial/63168 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 4-6\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089539/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00012-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00012-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用裂口设计的随机临床试验研究了30%氟化二胺银(SDF)与5%氟化钠清漆(NaD)在抑制学龄前儿童一磨牙近端龋齿方面的效果。研究对象为43例对侧初生磨牙近端龋齿患儿。使用临床和放射学指标记录基线时的龋病状况。局限于牙釉质或牙本质外三分之一的病变也包括在内。使用弹性分离器在触点之间创造了足够的空间。然后,将5% NaF清漆和30% SDF随机涂抹于口腔两侧。6个月后,获得咬牙x线片,并将干预后的龋齿评分与基线x线片进行比较。通过问卷调查记录儿童口腔卫生状况。研究结果表明,两组之间的基线和干预后的龋齿状况具有可比性。SDF处理(74.4%)和NaF清漆(67.5%)的成功率相当。NaF组的基线放射学龋齿状况与治疗结果显著相关(p = 0.047)。使用SDF时,使用牙线与治疗结果显著相关(p = 0.027)。总之,两种含氟材料在抑制初生磨牙早期近端龋齿病变方面表现出相当的功效。与NaF 5%清漆相比,30%的SDF在抑制第一磨牙初始近端病变方面表现出更高但不显著的成功率。试验注册:IRCT, IRCT20220425054647N1。2022年9月24日注册,网址:https://en.irct.ir/trial/63168。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Silver diamine fluoride versus sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of proximal caries in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.

Silver diamine fluoride versus sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of proximal caries in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.

The present randomized clinical trial with a split-mouth design investigated the effectiveness of 30% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) compared to 5% sodium flouride varnish (NaD) in arresting proximal caries in the primary molars of preschool-aged children. Forty-three children with contralateral initial proximal carious lesions on primary molars were included. Caries status at the baseline was recorded using clinical and radiographic indices. Lesions restricted to the enamel or the exterior third of dentin were included. A sufficient space was created between the contacts using elastic separators. Then, 5% NaF varnish and 30% SDF were randomly applied to either side of the mouth. Six months later, bitewing radiographs were obtained, and the post-intervention caries scores were compared with the baseline radiographs. Children's oral hygiene was recorded via a questionnaire. The findings indicated that the baseline and post-intervention caries status were comparable between the groups. The success rate of the SDF treatment (74.4%) and the NaF varnish (67.5%) was comparable. Baseline radiographic caries status was significantly related to the treatment result in the NaF group (p = 0.047). Dental flossing was significantly associated with the treatment result when SDF was used (p = 0.027). In conclusion, both fluoride-containing materials exhibited comparable efficacy in arresting early proximal caries lesions in primary molars. SDF 30% showed a higher but insignificant success rate in arresting initial proximal lesions of the primary molar compared to NaF 5% varnish.Trial registration: IRCT, IRCT20220425054647N1. Registered on 24 September 2022, https://en.irct.ir/trial/63168 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信