戏剧与规范化病人方法的比较,发展突发新闻培训中的人文关怀。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Selçuk Akturan, Yasemin Türk, Yasemin Güner, Ayşenur Duman Dilbaz
{"title":"戏剧与规范化病人方法的比较,发展突发新闻培训中的人文关怀。","authors":"Selçuk Akturan, Yasemin Türk, Yasemin Güner, Ayşenur Duman Dilbaz","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2025-013222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicine is inherently a humanistic profession. However, recent studies have emphasised the need for medical students to develop humane attitudes and behaviours. Breaking bad news is also one topic where a humanistic approach needs to be developed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects and differences between drama and the standardised patient (SP) method in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) on fostering a humanistic approach in breaking bad news. This is a comparative case study, a qualitative research method, encompassing content analyses of observer notes and transcripts of audio recordings from debriefing sessions. The study includes fifth-year medical students from Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, with 20 volunteer students participating as the sample. The listed students, those with odd numbers, were assigned to the SP-based OSCE group, while those with even numbers were assigned to the drama-based OSCE group. Data was analysed using Creswell's content analysis approach. A total of 20 students participated in the study, with half evaluated through SP-based OSCEs and the other half through drama-based OSCEs. A comparative analysis of drama-based and SP-based OSCE debriefings revealed unique strengths and challenges. Drama-based OSCEs fostered empathy, emotional engagement and reflective practice, aiding students in managing emotions. SP-based OSCEs enhanced structured communication but sometimes led to emotional desensitisation and performative empathy. Overall, the drama method proved to be a more humanistic approach effective in nurturing natural empathy and supportive communication, particularly in breaking bad news. This study highlights the strengths of drama-based OSCEs in fostering empathy and emotional engagement while maintaining structured communication frameworks. By directly comparing drama and SP methods, our findings underscore the potential of drama-based approaches to enhance humanistic medical education and patient communication. Integrating the complementary strengths of both methods into medical training can better prepare students for compassionate, effective patient interactions, addressing both emotional and technical aspects of clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of drama and standardised patient method to develop humanistic approach in breaking bad news training.\",\"authors\":\"Selçuk Akturan, Yasemin Türk, Yasemin Güner, Ayşenur Duman Dilbaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2025-013222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medicine is inherently a humanistic profession. However, recent studies have emphasised the need for medical students to develop humane attitudes and behaviours. Breaking bad news is also one topic where a humanistic approach needs to be developed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects and differences between drama and the standardised patient (SP) method in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) on fostering a humanistic approach in breaking bad news. This is a comparative case study, a qualitative research method, encompassing content analyses of observer notes and transcripts of audio recordings from debriefing sessions. The study includes fifth-year medical students from Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, with 20 volunteer students participating as the sample. The listed students, those with odd numbers, were assigned to the SP-based OSCE group, while those with even numbers were assigned to the drama-based OSCE group. Data was analysed using Creswell's content analysis approach. A total of 20 students participated in the study, with half evaluated through SP-based OSCEs and the other half through drama-based OSCEs. A comparative analysis of drama-based and SP-based OSCE debriefings revealed unique strengths and challenges. Drama-based OSCEs fostered empathy, emotional engagement and reflective practice, aiding students in managing emotions. SP-based OSCEs enhanced structured communication but sometimes led to emotional desensitisation and performative empathy. Overall, the drama method proved to be a more humanistic approach effective in nurturing natural empathy and supportive communication, particularly in breaking bad news. This study highlights the strengths of drama-based OSCEs in fostering empathy and emotional engagement while maintaining structured communication frameworks. By directly comparing drama and SP methods, our findings underscore the potential of drama-based approaches to enhance humanistic medical education and patient communication. Integrating the complementary strengths of both methods into medical training can better prepare students for compassionate, effective patient interactions, addressing both emotional and technical aspects of clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013222\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学本质上是一种人文职业。然而,最近的研究强调,医学生需要培养人道的态度和行为。突发坏消息也是一个需要发展人文主义方法的话题。本研究的目的是探讨客观结构化临床检查(oses)中的戏剧和标准化病人(SP)方法在培养坏消息报道的人文态度方面的效果和差异。这是一个比较案例研究,一种定性研究方法,包括对观察员笔记的内容分析和汇报会议的录音誊本。这项研究包括来自卡拉德尼兹技术大学医学院的五年级医学生,以及20名志愿学生作为样本。名单上的学生,那些奇数的,被分配到以sp为基础的欧安组织组,而那些偶数的被分配到以戏剧为基础的欧安组织组。数据分析采用Creswell的内容分析法。共有20名学生参加了这项研究,其中一半通过基于sp的osce进行评估,另一半通过基于戏剧的osce进行评估。欧安组织以戏剧为基础的汇报和以sp为基础的汇报的比较分析揭示了其独特的优势和挑战。以戏剧为基础的欧安组织活动培养了同理心、情感投入和反思实践,帮助学生管理情绪。基于sp的osce增强了结构化的沟通,但有时会导致情绪脱敏和行为移情。总的来说,戏剧方法被证明是一种更人性化的方法,在培养自然的同理心和支持性沟通方面有效,尤其是在突发坏消息时。本研究强调了基于戏剧的oses在培养同理心和情感投入方面的优势,同时保持结构化的沟通框架。通过直接比较戏剧和SP方法,我们的研究结果强调了戏剧为基础的方法在加强人文医学教育和患者沟通方面的潜力。将这两种方法的互补优势整合到医学培训中,可以更好地为学生提供富有同情心、有效的患者互动,解决临床护理的情感和技术方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of drama and standardised patient method to develop humanistic approach in breaking bad news training.

Medicine is inherently a humanistic profession. However, recent studies have emphasised the need for medical students to develop humane attitudes and behaviours. Breaking bad news is also one topic where a humanistic approach needs to be developed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects and differences between drama and the standardised patient (SP) method in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) on fostering a humanistic approach in breaking bad news. This is a comparative case study, a qualitative research method, encompassing content analyses of observer notes and transcripts of audio recordings from debriefing sessions. The study includes fifth-year medical students from Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, with 20 volunteer students participating as the sample. The listed students, those with odd numbers, were assigned to the SP-based OSCE group, while those with even numbers were assigned to the drama-based OSCE group. Data was analysed using Creswell's content analysis approach. A total of 20 students participated in the study, with half evaluated through SP-based OSCEs and the other half through drama-based OSCEs. A comparative analysis of drama-based and SP-based OSCE debriefings revealed unique strengths and challenges. Drama-based OSCEs fostered empathy, emotional engagement and reflective practice, aiding students in managing emotions. SP-based OSCEs enhanced structured communication but sometimes led to emotional desensitisation and performative empathy. Overall, the drama method proved to be a more humanistic approach effective in nurturing natural empathy and supportive communication, particularly in breaking bad news. This study highlights the strengths of drama-based OSCEs in fostering empathy and emotional engagement while maintaining structured communication frameworks. By directly comparing drama and SP methods, our findings underscore the potential of drama-based approaches to enhance humanistic medical education and patient communication. Integrating the complementary strengths of both methods into medical training can better prepare students for compassionate, effective patient interactions, addressing both emotional and technical aspects of clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信