急诊科影像策略在社区获得性肺炎诊断检查中的成本效益:一项真实的回顾性研究。

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski
{"title":"急诊科影像策略在社区获得性肺炎诊断检查中的成本效益:一项真实的回顾性研究。","authors":"Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090570/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较在急诊科(ED)治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的超低剂量(ULD)胸部计算机断层扫描和x线摄影诊断检查的住院时间(LOS)和费用。方法:我们对2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日期间在两个急诊科接受CAP治疗的患者进行了现实回顾性研究。我们估计住院时间(LOS)为急诊科出院和入院时间之间的差异,60天内的总住院费用,包括急诊科、初次入院和再入院。通过人口统计学变量、生命参数和临床表现计算的倾向评分的逆概率加权,比较初始x线片患者与初始ULD CT患者。我们将增量成本效益比计算为成本与LOS之间的差异。使用非参数自举评估结果的可变性。结果:我们纳入了1609例连续患者,1476例x线片患者和133例ULD CT患者。平均成本分别为€4317 [3483;5067]和4223欧元[4034;4612]与11.9 [10.1;13.2]和11.7 [11.5;在急诊室进行胸部x线摄影和ULD胸部CT分别减少了12.2小时的LOS,降低了成本-94欧元[-870欧元];819], LOS降低12 [-108];76.9]分钟有利于ULD胸部CT。结论:在这项现实生活中的研究中,与胸片相比,使用ULD胸部CT治疗ED中CAP的成本更低,而LOS不增加。试验注册:本研究已在临床试验注册中心注册(NCT05140408)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.

Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.

Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.

Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.

Results: We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.

Conclusions: In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信