Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski
{"title":"急诊科影像策略在社区获得性肺炎诊断检查中的成本效益:一项真实的回顾性研究。","authors":"Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Kepka, Kevin Zarca, Mickaël Ohana, Louise Hoffbeck, Charlène Heimann, Pierrick Le Borgne, François Severac, Joris Muller, Erik-André Sauleau, Pascal Bilbault, Isabelle Durand Zaleski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090570/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00625-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost effectiveness of imaging strategies in the emergency department for the diagnostic workup of community-acquired pneumonia: a real-life retrospective study.
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the length of stay (LOS) and costs of diagnostic workup by Ultra Low Dose (ULD) chest computed tomography and radiography for patients treated for a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: We conducted a real-life retrospective study of patients treated for a CAP in two ED between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. We estimated length of stay (LOS) as the difference between ED discharge and entry times, total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, initial admissions and readmissions. Patients with initial radiography were compared with patients with initial ULD CT using inverse probability weighing of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference between costs and the difference between LOS. Variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping.
Results: We included 1609 consecutive patients, 1476 patients with radiography and 133 patients with ULD CT. The average costs were respectively €4317 [3483; 5067] and €4223 [4034; 4612] with 11.9 [10.1; 13.2] and 11.7 [11.5; 12.2] hours of LOS in the ED for chest radiography and ULD chest CT respectively, resulting in lower costs of € -94 [-870; 819] and a decreased LOS of 12 [-108; 76.9] minutes in favor of ULD chest CT.
Conclusions: In this real-life study, the management of CAP in ED by ULD chest CT compared with chest radiography resulted in lower costs without increasing LOS.
Trial registration: This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05140408).
期刊介绍:
Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.