探讨阿加曲班辅助抗血小板治疗缺血性脑卒中患者的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yousr Ahmed, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Gulnaz Bahtiyarova, Younes Nabgouri, Mohammed Elkholy, Reham M Wagih, Ibrahim Serag, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abouzid, Mahmoud Elsayed
{"title":"探讨阿加曲班辅助抗血小板治疗缺血性脑卒中患者的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yousr Ahmed, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Gulnaz Bahtiyarova, Younes Nabgouri, Mohammed Elkholy, Reham M Wagih, Ibrahim Serag, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abouzid, Mahmoud Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD =  - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yousr Ahmed, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Gulnaz Bahtiyarova, Younes Nabgouri, Mohammed Elkholy, Reham M Wagih, Ibrahim Serag, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abouzid, Mahmoud Elsayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD =  - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Stroke Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Stroke Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性缺血性中风(AIS)是世界范围内致残和死亡的主要原因。虽然抗血小板治疗是二级预防的标准,但许多患者仍然经历早期神经功能恶化(END)。阿加曲班是一种直接凝血酶抑制剂,可以潜在地限制血栓的进展并改善AIS的功能结局。本荟萃分析评估了阿加曲班联合单抗(SAPT)或双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)与单独抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。按照PRISMA的指导方针,对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了系统的搜索,直到2025年1月。随机对照试验(rct)和队列研究评估阿加曲班加抗血小板与单独抗血小板在AIS患者中的作用。主要终点为90天修正Rankin评分(mRS) 0-2。次要结局包括90天mRS 0-1和mRS 3-5、END和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)改善、卒中复发、颅内出血(ICH)、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和死亡率。我们在95%置信区间(CI)和p值0.05下使用连续变量的均值差(MD)和二分变量的比值比(OR)。共纳入14项研究(4项随机对照试验和10项队列研究)。与单独使用抗血小板药物相比,阿加曲班显著改善了功能结局,增加了mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02])和mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02])的发生率,同时降低了END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02])。阿加曲班也与NIHSS评分的改善相关(MD = - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005])。mRS 3-5、卒中复发率、脑出血、脑出血或死亡率无显著差异。亚组分析表明,阿加曲班联合DAPT疗效最大。阿加曲班联合抗血小板治疗可改善功能恢复,降低终末期肾病,而不增加出血风险。这些发现支持其在轻度至中度AIS治疗中的应用,特别是与DAPT一起使用。需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来优化给药策略和患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD =  - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信