植入补片缝线后的结果:1111例患者的登记。

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766
Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro
{"title":"植入补片缝线后的结果:1111例患者的登记。","authors":"Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"e6766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:网状缝线是一种新颖的缝线设计,旨在在缝线-组织界面分配压力,潜在地减少缝线穿过和修复失败。本研究旨在评估网状缝合闭合在手术指征中的可行性,并评估早期结果,重点是腹壁闭合。方法:使用综合医疗保健系统中2023年1月至2024年7月的机构植入物日志创建注册表。回顾性图表回顾收集了人口统计学、手术细节和并发症。结果:86名外科医生共对1111例患者进行了补片缝合。大多数病例涉及全层腹壁闭合(88.2%)。进一步的分析集中在没有平面补片的腹壁闭合(N = 862)。90 d手术部位感染率为9.0%,手术部位事件发生率为11.8%。有9例(1.0%)筋膜破裂,3例(0.3%)慢性引流窦,2例(0.2%)肠皮瘘。90天再入院率和再手术率分别为7.0%和7.5%。疝形成率为4.8%。单因素分析显示,美国麻醉学会分级、伤口分级和糖尿病与主要并发症显著相关(P < 0.05)。平均随访时间为162天。结论:网片缝合功能多样,用户友好,跨越专业和适应症。早期结果令人鼓舞;然而,需要更长时间随访的前瞻性研究来进一步评估长期表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.

Background: Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.

Methods: A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.

Results: In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.

Conclusions: Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信