Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro
{"title":"植入补片缝线后的结果:1111例患者的登记。","authors":"Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Megan M Perez, Taaha Hassan, Mehul Mittal, May Li, Kazimir Bagdady, Taylor G Hallman, Paige N Hackenberger, Gregory A Dumanian, Michael Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"e6766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.
Background: Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure.
Methods: A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications.
Results: In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 162 days.
Conclusions: Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.