预处理绝对单核细胞计数与类风湿关节炎患者生物疾病改善性抗风湿药物无反应相关。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
S F Ling, P Ho, M Bukhari, D Mewar, H Chinoy, A W Morgan, J D Isaacs, A G Wilson, K L Hyrich, A Barton, D Plant
{"title":"预处理绝对单核细胞计数与类风湿关节炎患者生物疾病改善性抗风湿药物无反应相关。","authors":"S F Ling, P Ho, M Bukhari, D Mewar, H Chinoy, A W Morgan, J D Isaacs, A G Wilson, K L Hyrich, A Barton, D Plant","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2025.2497606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous publications have reported that increased absolute monocyte counts are associated with treatment non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study investigated whether full blood count (FBC) components from routine clinical testing before treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) were associated with treatment non-response after 6 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From a UK-based prospective multicentre study of patients with RA starting a bDMARD, data from 246 patients attending five of the participating centres were retrieved. FBC components were analysed for their association with European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology non-response after 6 months of treatment using backward stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Final models underwent resampling with 200 repeats of out-of-bag bootstrapping to assess model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves. Model fit was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months of treatment, the only FBC component predictive of non-response was pretreatment absolute monocyte count [adjusted odds ratio (OR<sub>adj</sub>) 9.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.61-59.86, p = 0.01, AUROC = 60.42%). The model including monocytes as a predictor demonstrated superior performance to the covariates-only model (AIC 184.36 vs 188.51, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the largest study to date, increasing absolute monocyte counts were associated with bDMARD non-response after 6 months of treatment, replicating previous reports. Validation and mechanistic studies are required to inform future treatment selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pretreatment absolute monocyte counts are associated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"S F Ling, P Ho, M Bukhari, D Mewar, H Chinoy, A W Morgan, J D Isaacs, A G Wilson, K L Hyrich, A Barton, D Plant\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03009742.2025.2497606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous publications have reported that increased absolute monocyte counts are associated with treatment non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study investigated whether full blood count (FBC) components from routine clinical testing before treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) were associated with treatment non-response after 6 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From a UK-based prospective multicentre study of patients with RA starting a bDMARD, data from 246 patients attending five of the participating centres were retrieved. FBC components were analysed for their association with European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology non-response after 6 months of treatment using backward stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Final models underwent resampling with 200 repeats of out-of-bag bootstrapping to assess model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves. Model fit was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months of treatment, the only FBC component predictive of non-response was pretreatment absolute monocyte count [adjusted odds ratio (OR<sub>adj</sub>) 9.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.61-59.86, p = 0.01, AUROC = 60.42%). The model including monocytes as a predictor demonstrated superior performance to the covariates-only model (AIC 184.36 vs 188.51, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the largest study to date, increasing absolute monocyte counts were associated with bDMARD non-response after 6 months of treatment, replicating previous reports. Validation and mechanistic studies are required to inform future treatment selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2025.2497606\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2025.2497606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以前的出版物报道了绝对单核细胞计数增加与类风湿关节炎(RA)患者治疗无反应相关。本研究调查了使用生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bDMARD)治疗前常规临床检测的全血细胞计数(FBC)成分是否与治疗6个月后治疗无反应相关。方法:从一项基于英国的RA患者开始bDMARD的前瞻性多中心研究中,检索了来自5个参与中心的246名患者的数据。使用后向逐步逻辑回归分析FBC成分与欧洲风湿病协会联盟治疗6个月后无反应的关系,调整潜在混杂因素。最终的模型进行了200次袋外自举的重新采样,利用接受者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积来评估模型的性能。采用赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)对模型拟合进行比较。结果:治疗6个月后,唯一预测无反应的FBC成分是预处理绝对单核细胞计数[调整优势比(ORadj) 9.56, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.61 ~ 59.86, p = 0.01, AUROC = 60.42%]。包括单核细胞作为预测因子的模型表现出优于仅协变量模型的性能(AIC分别为184.36和188.51)。结论:在迄今为止最大规模的研究中,在治疗6个月后,增加的绝对单核细胞计数与bDMARD无反应相关,重复了先前的报道。需要验证和机制研究来为未来的治疗选择提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pretreatment absolute monocyte counts are associated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective: Previous publications have reported that increased absolute monocyte counts are associated with treatment non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study investigated whether full blood count (FBC) components from routine clinical testing before treatment with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) were associated with treatment non-response after 6 months of treatment.

Method: From a UK-based prospective multicentre study of patients with RA starting a bDMARD, data from 246 patients attending five of the participating centres were retrieved. FBC components were analysed for their association with European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology non-response after 6 months of treatment using backward stepwise logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Final models underwent resampling with 200 repeats of out-of-bag bootstrapping to assess model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves. Model fit was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Results: After 6 months of treatment, the only FBC component predictive of non-response was pretreatment absolute monocyte count [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 9.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.61-59.86, p = 0.01, AUROC = 60.42%). The model including monocytes as a predictor demonstrated superior performance to the covariates-only model (AIC 184.36 vs 188.51, respectively).

Conclusion: In the largest study to date, increasing absolute monocyte counts were associated with bDMARD non-response after 6 months of treatment, replicating previous reports. Validation and mechanistic studies are required to inform future treatment selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases. The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including; Epidemiology Aetiology and pathogenesis Treatment and prophylaxis Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信