Samer Abu Salem, Koby Goren, Samer Michael, Ronit Brodie, David Kushnir, Jenia Yagil, Gabriel Szydlo Shein, Brigitte Helou, Gad Marom, Yoav Mintz
{"title":"微创手术中自收放式腹腔内装置安全性的验证。","authors":"Samer Abu Salem, Koby Goren, Samer Michael, Ronit Brodie, David Kushnir, Jenia Yagil, Gabriel Szydlo Shein, Brigitte Helou, Gad Marom, Yoav Mintz","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modernly, abdominal surgery has shifted to minimally invasive techniques with an inclination towards fewer incisions. This has made intra-abdominal retraction more challenging. Despite development in retracting instrumentation for solid organs, the mobilization of the bowel remains challenging due to its friable nature. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the safety profile of internal retractors such as the EndoGrab for small-bowel retraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty locations of small bowel were selected for EndoGrab retraction in two pigs. The locations were studied for iatrogenic injury at acute and delayed stages. Evaluation of injury was assessed clinically and histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the EndoGrab application, no immediate signs of perforation or ischemia were observed. The clinical post-operative course was uncomplicated. Histopathology findings included serosal compression and minimal mucosal ulceration. Long-term changes showed mild changes of focal edema and fibrosis, with inter-individual variability in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there were no signs of overt macroscopic acute injury, minimal microscopic changes were evident. According to this small-scale study, the EndoGrab can provide an effective and safe solution for small-bowel self-retractors. More research is needed to acquire a higher level of evidence for safety. Such a solution could eliminate ports or assistants previously designed for retraction only.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of safety for self-retracting intraperitoneal device for small bowel in minimally invasive surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Samer Abu Salem, Koby Goren, Samer Michael, Ronit Brodie, David Kushnir, Jenia Yagil, Gabriel Szydlo Shein, Brigitte Helou, Gad Marom, Yoav Mintz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modernly, abdominal surgery has shifted to minimally invasive techniques with an inclination towards fewer incisions. This has made intra-abdominal retraction more challenging. Despite development in retracting instrumentation for solid organs, the mobilization of the bowel remains challenging due to its friable nature. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the safety profile of internal retractors such as the EndoGrab for small-bowel retraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty locations of small bowel were selected for EndoGrab retraction in two pigs. The locations were studied for iatrogenic injury at acute and delayed stages. Evaluation of injury was assessed clinically and histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the EndoGrab application, no immediate signs of perforation or ischemia were observed. The clinical post-operative course was uncomplicated. Histopathology findings included serosal compression and minimal mucosal ulceration. Long-term changes showed mild changes of focal edema and fibrosis, with inter-individual variability in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there were no signs of overt macroscopic acute injury, minimal microscopic changes were evident. According to this small-scale study, the EndoGrab can provide an effective and safe solution for small-bowel self-retractors. More research is needed to acquire a higher level of evidence for safety. Such a solution could eliminate ports or assistants previously designed for retraction only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2500742\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2500742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of safety for self-retracting intraperitoneal device for small bowel in minimally invasive surgery.
Background: Modernly, abdominal surgery has shifted to minimally invasive techniques with an inclination towards fewer incisions. This has made intra-abdominal retraction more challenging. Despite development in retracting instrumentation for solid organs, the mobilization of the bowel remains challenging due to its friable nature. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the safety profile of internal retractors such as the EndoGrab for small-bowel retraction.
Methods: Twenty locations of small bowel were selected for EndoGrab retraction in two pigs. The locations were studied for iatrogenic injury at acute and delayed stages. Evaluation of injury was assessed clinically and histologically.
Results: After the EndoGrab application, no immediate signs of perforation or ischemia were observed. The clinical post-operative course was uncomplicated. Histopathology findings included serosal compression and minimal mucosal ulceration. Long-term changes showed mild changes of focal edema and fibrosis, with inter-individual variability in severity.
Conclusion: While there were no signs of overt macroscopic acute injury, minimal microscopic changes were evident. According to this small-scale study, the EndoGrab can provide an effective and safe solution for small-bowel self-retractors. More research is needed to acquire a higher level of evidence for safety. Such a solution could eliminate ports or assistants previously designed for retraction only.
期刊介绍:
Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.