人工智能在精神卫生领域:希望还是炒作?]

Q4 Medicine
Katherine C Bassil, Edwin van Dellen
{"title":"人工智能在精神卫生领域:希望还是炒作?]","authors":"Katherine C Bassil, Edwin van Dellen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds promise for addressing significant challenges in mental healthcare, such as workforce shortages, waiting lists, and the need for personalized diagnostics and treatments. However, current high expectations contrast with the complexities revealed by research on clinical implementations. This paper critically examines two clinical applications of AI in mental healthcare: clinical decision support and mental health chatbots. AI-driven decision support tools, despite their capacity to predict treatment outcomes, face ethical and practical challenges, including fairness concerns, limited outcome measurability, and patient perspectives often overlooked during development. Similarly, mental health chatbots, while enhancing accessibility and supporting therapeutic processes, raise concerns regarding patient autonomy, accountability, and safety. Increasing cases of AI chatbot misuseleading toharmful consequences highlight the need for robust ethical guidelines and rigorous validation before clinical implementation. AI's integration in psychiatry thus requires careful consideration of ethical implications, patient-centered design, and recognition of AI's limitations to ensure improvements genuinely enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[AI in mental healthcare: hope or hype?]\",\"authors\":\"Katherine C Bassil, Edwin van Dellen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds promise for addressing significant challenges in mental healthcare, such as workforce shortages, waiting lists, and the need for personalized diagnostics and treatments. However, current high expectations contrast with the complexities revealed by research on clinical implementations. This paper critically examines two clinical applications of AI in mental healthcare: clinical decision support and mental health chatbots. AI-driven decision support tools, despite their capacity to predict treatment outcomes, face ethical and practical challenges, including fairness concerns, limited outcome measurability, and patient perspectives often overlooked during development. Similarly, mental health chatbots, while enhancing accessibility and supporting therapeutic processes, raise concerns regarding patient autonomy, accountability, and safety. Increasing cases of AI chatbot misuseleading toharmful consequences highlight the need for robust ethical guidelines and rigorous validation before clinical implementation. AI's integration in psychiatry thus requires careful consideration of ethical implications, patient-centered design, and recognition of AI's limitations to ensure improvements genuinely enhance patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)有望解决精神卫生保健领域的重大挑战,例如劳动力短缺、等待名单以及对个性化诊断和治疗的需求。然而,目前的高期望与临床实施研究显示的复杂性形成鲜明对比。本文批判性地研究了人工智能在精神卫生保健中的两种临床应用:临床决策支持和精神卫生聊天机器人。人工智能驱动的决策支持工具尽管具有预测治疗结果的能力,但仍面临伦理和实践方面的挑战,包括公平性问题、有限的结果可测量性以及在开发过程中经常被忽视的患者观点。同样,心理健康聊天机器人在提高可及性和支持治疗过程的同时,也引起了对患者自主权、问责制和安全性的担忧。越来越多的人工智能聊天机器人滥用导致有害后果的案例凸显了在临床应用之前需要强有力的道德准则和严格的验证。因此,人工智能在精神病学中的整合需要仔细考虑伦理影响,以患者为中心的设计,并认识到人工智能的局限性,以确保改进真正提高患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[AI in mental healthcare: hope or hype?]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds promise for addressing significant challenges in mental healthcare, such as workforce shortages, waiting lists, and the need for personalized diagnostics and treatments. However, current high expectations contrast with the complexities revealed by research on clinical implementations. This paper critically examines two clinical applications of AI in mental healthcare: clinical decision support and mental health chatbots. AI-driven decision support tools, despite their capacity to predict treatment outcomes, face ethical and practical challenges, including fairness concerns, limited outcome measurability, and patient perspectives often overlooked during development. Similarly, mental health chatbots, while enhancing accessibility and supporting therapeutic processes, raise concerns regarding patient autonomy, accountability, and safety. Increasing cases of AI chatbot misuseleading toharmful consequences highlight the need for robust ethical guidelines and rigorous validation before clinical implementation. AI's integration in psychiatry thus requires careful consideration of ethical implications, patient-centered design, and recognition of AI's limitations to ensure improvements genuinely enhance patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信