用于7 T MRI的颈脊髓射频线圈的多中心基准:一项行棘研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Eva Alonso-Ortiz, Daniel Papp, Robert L Barry, Kyota Poëti, Alan C Seifert, Kyle M Gilbert, Nibardo Lopez-Rios, Jan Paska, Falk Eippert, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Laura Beghini, Nadine N Graedel, Robert Trampel, Martina F Callaghan, Christoph S Aigner, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif, Aurélien Destruel, Virginie Callot, Johanna Vannesjo, Julien Cohen-Adad
{"title":"用于7 T MRI的颈脊髓射频线圈的多中心基准:一项行棘研究。","authors":"Eva Alonso-Ortiz, Daniel Papp, Robert L Barry, Kyota Poëti, Alan C Seifert, Kyle M Gilbert, Nibardo Lopez-Rios, Jan Paska, Falk Eippert, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Laura Beghini, Nadine N Graedel, Robert Trampel, Martina F Callaghan, Christoph S Aigner, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif, Aurélien Destruel, Virginie Callot, Johanna Vannesjo, Julien Cohen-Adad","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The depth within the body, small diameter, long length, and varying tissue surrounding the spinal cord impose specific considerations when designing RF coils. The optimal coil configuration for 7 T cervical spinal cord MRI is unknown and currently there are very few coil options. The purpose of this work was (1) to establish a quality control protocol for evaluating 7 T cervical spinal cord coils, and (2) to use that protocol to evaluate the performance of four different coil designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three healthy volunteers and a custom anthropomorphic phantom (the traveling spines cohort) were scanned at seven 7 T imaging centers using a common protocol and each center's specific cervical spinal cord coil. Four different coil designs were tested (two in-house, one Rapid Biomedical, and one MRI.TOOLS design).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Rapid Biomedical coil was found to have the highest <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> efficiency, whereas one of the in-house designs (NeuroPoly Lab) had the highest SNR and the largest spinal cord coverage. The MRI.TOOLS coil had the most uniform <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> profile along the cervical spinal cord; however, it was limited in its ability to provide the requested flip angles (especially for larger individuals). The latter was also the case for the second in-house coil (MSSM).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study serve as a guide for the spinal cord MRI community in selecting the most suitable coil based on specific requirements and offer a standardized protocol for assessing future coils.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-center benchmarking of cervical spinal cord RF coils for 7 T MRI: A traveling spines study.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Alonso-Ortiz, Daniel Papp, Robert L Barry, Kyota Poëti, Alan C Seifert, Kyle M Gilbert, Nibardo Lopez-Rios, Jan Paska, Falk Eippert, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Laura Beghini, Nadine N Graedel, Robert Trampel, Martina F Callaghan, Christoph S Aigner, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif, Aurélien Destruel, Virginie Callot, Johanna Vannesjo, Julien Cohen-Adad\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The depth within the body, small diameter, long length, and varying tissue surrounding the spinal cord impose specific considerations when designing RF coils. The optimal coil configuration for 7 T cervical spinal cord MRI is unknown and currently there are very few coil options. The purpose of this work was (1) to establish a quality control protocol for evaluating 7 T cervical spinal cord coils, and (2) to use that protocol to evaluate the performance of four different coil designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three healthy volunteers and a custom anthropomorphic phantom (the traveling spines cohort) were scanned at seven 7 T imaging centers using a common protocol and each center's specific cervical spinal cord coil. Four different coil designs were tested (two in-house, one Rapid Biomedical, and one MRI.TOOLS design).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Rapid Biomedical coil was found to have the highest <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> efficiency, whereas one of the in-house designs (NeuroPoly Lab) had the highest SNR and the largest spinal cord coverage. The MRI.TOOLS coil had the most uniform <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> profile along the cervical spinal cord; however, it was limited in its ability to provide the requested flip angles (especially for larger individuals). The latter was also the case for the second in-house coil (MSSM).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study serve as a guide for the spinal cord MRI community in selecting the most suitable coil based on specific requirements and offer a standardized protocol for assessing future coils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30551\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在设计射频线圈时,体内的深度、小直径、长长度和脊髓周围不同的组织都需要特别考虑。7 T颈脊髓MRI的最佳线圈配置是未知的,目前只有很少的线圈选择。这项工作的目的是:(1)建立一个质量控制方案来评估7个T颈脊髓线圈,(2)使用该方案来评估四种不同线圈设计的性能。方法:3名健康志愿者和一个定制的拟人化幻影(旅行脊柱队列)在7个7t成像中心使用共同的方案和每个中心特定的颈脊髓线圈进行扫描。测试了四种不同的线圈设计(两种内部设计,一种快速生物医学设计,一种MRI设计)。工具设计)。结果:快速生物医学线圈具有最高的b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$效率,而内部设计的一种(NeuroPoly Lab)具有最高的信噪比和最大的脊髓覆盖率。核磁共振成像。TOOLS线圈沿颈脊髓具有最均匀的b1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$轮廓;然而,它提供所需翻转角度的能力有限(特别是对于较大的个体)。后者也是第二个内部线圈(MSSM)的情况。结论:本研究结果为脊髓MRI界根据具体要求选择最合适的线圈提供了指导,并为评估未来的线圈提供了标准化的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-center benchmarking of cervical spinal cord RF coils for 7 T MRI: A traveling spines study.

Purpose: The depth within the body, small diameter, long length, and varying tissue surrounding the spinal cord impose specific considerations when designing RF coils. The optimal coil configuration for 7 T cervical spinal cord MRI is unknown and currently there are very few coil options. The purpose of this work was (1) to establish a quality control protocol for evaluating 7 T cervical spinal cord coils, and (2) to use that protocol to evaluate the performance of four different coil designs.

Methods: Three healthy volunteers and a custom anthropomorphic phantom (the traveling spines cohort) were scanned at seven 7 T imaging centers using a common protocol and each center's specific cervical spinal cord coil. Four different coil designs were tested (two in-house, one Rapid Biomedical, and one MRI.TOOLS design).

Results: The Rapid Biomedical coil was found to have the highest B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ efficiency, whereas one of the in-house designs (NeuroPoly Lab) had the highest SNR and the largest spinal cord coverage. The MRI.TOOLS coil had the most uniform B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ profile along the cervical spinal cord; however, it was limited in its ability to provide the requested flip angles (especially for larger individuals). The latter was also the case for the second in-house coil (MSSM).

Conclusion: The results of this study serve as a guide for the spinal cord MRI community in selecting the most suitable coil based on specific requirements and offer a standardized protocol for assessing future coils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信