心脏T1ρ在0.55 T作图的初步经验:连续波与绝热自旋锁制备脉冲。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dongyue Si, Michael G Crabb, Simon J Littlewood, Karl P Kunze, Juliet Varghese, Katherine Binzel, Mahmood Khan, Orlando P Simonetti, Claudia Prieto, René M Botnar
{"title":"心脏T1ρ在0.55 T作图的初步经验:连续波与绝热自旋锁制备脉冲。","authors":"Dongyue Si, Michael G Crabb, Simon J Littlewood, Karl P Kunze, Juliet Varghese, Katherine Binzel, Mahmood Khan, Orlando P Simonetti, Claudia Prieto, René M Botnar","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose and validate a cardiac T<sub>1</sub>ρ mapping sequence at 0.55 T comparing continuous-wave and adiabatic spin-lock (SL) preparation pulses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed 2D sequence acquires four single-shot balanced SSFP readout images with differing contrasts in a single breath-hold. The first three images are prepared with T<sub>1</sub>ρ preparation pulses with different durations, while the last image uses a saturation pulse immediately before data acquisition. The T<sub>1</sub>ρ map is calculated using a 3-parameter fitting method. Bloch equation simulations were performed to optimize the parameters of the adiabatic-SL pulses. Phantom studies and in vivo experiments in 10 healthy volunteers, a porcine myocardial infarction model, and a patient with suspected hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were performed to validate the performance of the proposed adiabatic T<sub>1</sub>ρ (T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub>) mapping in comparison with conventional continuous-wave T<sub>1</sub>ρ (T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub>) mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adiabatic-SL pulse with simulation-optimized parameters demonstrated robust performance despite B<sub>0</sub> and B<sub>1</sub> field inhomogeneities. Phantom T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> mapping exhibited comparable precision. In vivo experiments on healthy volunteers showed that myocardial T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> is higher than T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> (106.1 ± 7.1 vs. 47.0 ± 5.1 ms, p < 0.01) with better precision (11.4% ± 2.6% vs. 14.5% ± 2.1%, p < 0.01) and less spatial variation (10.9% ± 3.0% vs. 14.4% ± 3.4%, p < 0.01). Both T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> mapping agreed with late gadolinium enhancement findings in the porcine model and the patient, and exhibited improved contrast compared to T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> mapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> are promising for non-contrast detection of various cardiomyopathies at 0.55 T, but T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> demonstrates better spatial uniformity than T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial experience of cardiac T<sub>1</sub>ρ mapping at 0.55 T: Continuous wave versus adiabatic spin-lock preparation pulses.\",\"authors\":\"Dongyue Si, Michael G Crabb, Simon J Littlewood, Karl P Kunze, Juliet Varghese, Katherine Binzel, Mahmood Khan, Orlando P Simonetti, Claudia Prieto, René M Botnar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose and validate a cardiac T<sub>1</sub>ρ mapping sequence at 0.55 T comparing continuous-wave and adiabatic spin-lock (SL) preparation pulses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed 2D sequence acquires four single-shot balanced SSFP readout images with differing contrasts in a single breath-hold. The first three images are prepared with T<sub>1</sub>ρ preparation pulses with different durations, while the last image uses a saturation pulse immediately before data acquisition. The T<sub>1</sub>ρ map is calculated using a 3-parameter fitting method. Bloch equation simulations were performed to optimize the parameters of the adiabatic-SL pulses. Phantom studies and in vivo experiments in 10 healthy volunteers, a porcine myocardial infarction model, and a patient with suspected hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were performed to validate the performance of the proposed adiabatic T<sub>1</sub>ρ (T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub>) mapping in comparison with conventional continuous-wave T<sub>1</sub>ρ (T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub>) mapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adiabatic-SL pulse with simulation-optimized parameters demonstrated robust performance despite B<sub>0</sub> and B<sub>1</sub> field inhomogeneities. Phantom T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> mapping exhibited comparable precision. In vivo experiments on healthy volunteers showed that myocardial T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> is higher than T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> (106.1 ± 7.1 vs. 47.0 ± 5.1 ms, p < 0.01) with better precision (11.4% ± 2.6% vs. 14.5% ± 2.1%, p < 0.01) and less spatial variation (10.9% ± 3.0% vs. 14.4% ± 3.4%, p < 0.01). Both T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> mapping agreed with late gadolinium enhancement findings in the porcine model and the patient, and exhibited improved contrast compared to T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> mapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> are promising for non-contrast detection of various cardiomyopathies at 0.55 T, but T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>Ad</sub> demonstrates better spatial uniformity than T<sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>CW</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出并验证在0.55 T时心脏T1ρ作图序列,比较连续波和绝热自旋锁(SL)制备脉冲。方法:所提出的二维序列在一次屏气中获得四张具有不同对比度的单镜头平衡SSFP读出图像。前三幅图像是用不同持续时间的T1ρ制备脉冲制备的,而最后一幅图像是在数据采集前立即使用饱和脉冲制备的。T1ρ图采用三参数拟合方法计算。采用Bloch方程模拟优化了绝热sl脉冲的参数。通过10名健康志愿者、1只猪心肌梗死模型和1例疑似肥厚性心肌病患者的幻体研究和体内实验,验证了所提出的绝热T1ρ (T1ρ ad)映射与常规连续波T1ρ (T1ρ cw)映射的有效性。结果:在B0和B1场不均匀的情况下,具有模拟优化参数的绝热sl脉冲表现出稳健的性能。幻影T1ρCW和T1ρAd映射具有相当的精度。健康志愿者体内实验结果显示,心肌T1ρAd高于T1ρCW(106.1±7.1 vs 47.0±5.1 ms), p - ρ cw和T1ρAd测图与猪模型和患者的晚期钆增强结果一致,与T1和T2测图相比,对比度有所提高。结论:T1ρCW和T1ρAd在0.55 T时均可用于各种心肌病的非对比检测,但T1ρAd的空间均匀性优于T1ρCW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial experience of cardiac T1ρ mapping at 0.55 T: Continuous wave versus adiabatic spin-lock preparation pulses.

Purpose: To propose and validate a cardiac T1ρ mapping sequence at 0.55 T comparing continuous-wave and adiabatic spin-lock (SL) preparation pulses.

Methods: The proposed 2D sequence acquires four single-shot balanced SSFP readout images with differing contrasts in a single breath-hold. The first three images are prepared with T1ρ preparation pulses with different durations, while the last image uses a saturation pulse immediately before data acquisition. The T1ρ map is calculated using a 3-parameter fitting method. Bloch equation simulations were performed to optimize the parameters of the adiabatic-SL pulses. Phantom studies and in vivo experiments in 10 healthy volunteers, a porcine myocardial infarction model, and a patient with suspected hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were performed to validate the performance of the proposed adiabatic T1ρ (T1ρAd) mapping in comparison with conventional continuous-wave T1ρ (T1ρCW) mapping.

Results: The adiabatic-SL pulse with simulation-optimized parameters demonstrated robust performance despite B0 and B1 field inhomogeneities. Phantom T1ρCW and T1ρAd mapping exhibited comparable precision. In vivo experiments on healthy volunteers showed that myocardial T1ρAd is higher than T1ρCW (106.1 ± 7.1 vs. 47.0 ± 5.1 ms, p < 0.01) with better precision (11.4% ± 2.6% vs. 14.5% ± 2.1%, p < 0.01) and less spatial variation (10.9% ± 3.0% vs. 14.4% ± 3.4%, p < 0.01). Both T1ρCW and T1ρAd mapping agreed with late gadolinium enhancement findings in the porcine model and the patient, and exhibited improved contrast compared to T1 and T2 mapping.

Conclusion: Both T1ρCW and T1ρAd are promising for non-contrast detection of various cardiomyopathies at 0.55 T, but T1ρAd demonstrates better spatial uniformity than T1ρCW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信