体外受精与非体外受精妊娠的早期妊娠损失率。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Peter M Doubilet, Carol B Benson, Elizabeth S Ginsburg
{"title":"体外受精与非体外受精妊娠的早期妊娠损失率。","authors":"Peter M Doubilet, Carol B Benson, Elizabeth S Ginsburg","doi":"10.1002/jum.16728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare early pregnancy loss (EPL) rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus non-IVF pregnancies to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on first trimester outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study set consisted of all obstetrical ultrasounds at our institution over a 30-year period demonstrating a singleton intrauterine pregnancy (confirmed by either yolk sac but no embryo, or embryo <10 mm with cardiac activity), with known first trimester outcome. We assessed EPL rates based on mode of conception, maternal age, vaginal bleeding, and initial ultrasound finding (yolk sac only or embryo). We compared IVF versus non-IVF pregnancies with respect to EPL rate, maternal age, and vaginal bleeding. Most importantly, we used logistic regression analysis to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on loss rate, after controlling for age and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study set consisted of 16,458 pregnancies, 1394 (8.5%) resulting from IVF and 15,064 (91.5%) non-IVF. Overall EPL rate was 3348/16,458 (20.3%) and was higher in IVF pregnancies, in women aged ≥35 years, and with vaginal bleeding (P < .001, all comparisons). IVF pregnancies had higher maternal ages and were less likely to have vaginal bleeding as an indication for sonography. Logistic regression of mode of conception, maternal age, and bleeding as predictors of outcome demonstrated that mode of conception had no independent effect on outcome (P = .33 for cases with yolk sac only, P = .30 for cases with embryo).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVF has no impact on first trimester outcome. A woman pregnant via IVF has the same likelihood of miscarriage as a comparable woman with a non-IVF pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Pregnancy Loss Rate in In Vitro Fertilization Versus Non-IVF Pregnancies.\",\"authors\":\"Peter M Doubilet, Carol B Benson, Elizabeth S Ginsburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare early pregnancy loss (EPL) rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus non-IVF pregnancies to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on first trimester outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study set consisted of all obstetrical ultrasounds at our institution over a 30-year period demonstrating a singleton intrauterine pregnancy (confirmed by either yolk sac but no embryo, or embryo <10 mm with cardiac activity), with known first trimester outcome. We assessed EPL rates based on mode of conception, maternal age, vaginal bleeding, and initial ultrasound finding (yolk sac only or embryo). We compared IVF versus non-IVF pregnancies with respect to EPL rate, maternal age, and vaginal bleeding. Most importantly, we used logistic regression analysis to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on loss rate, after controlling for age and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study set consisted of 16,458 pregnancies, 1394 (8.5%) resulting from IVF and 15,064 (91.5%) non-IVF. Overall EPL rate was 3348/16,458 (20.3%) and was higher in IVF pregnancies, in women aged ≥35 years, and with vaginal bleeding (P < .001, all comparisons). IVF pregnancies had higher maternal ages and were less likely to have vaginal bleeding as an indication for sonography. Logistic regression of mode of conception, maternal age, and bleeding as predictors of outcome demonstrated that mode of conception had no independent effect on outcome (P = .33 for cases with yolk sac only, P = .30 for cases with embryo).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVF has no impact on first trimester outcome. A woman pregnant via IVF has the same likelihood of miscarriage as a comparable woman with a non-IVF pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较体外受精(IVF)与非IVF妊娠的早期妊娠损失(EPL)率,以确定IVF是否对妊娠早期结局有独立影响。方法:我们的研究集包括我院30年来所有显示单胎宫内妊娠(由卵黄囊证实但没有胚胎,或胚胎证实)的产科超声检查。结果:我们的研究集包括16,458例妊娠,1394例(8.5%)IVF, 15064例(91.5%)非IVF。总EPL率为3348/16,458(20.3%),在IVF妊娠、年龄≥35岁的妇女和阴道出血的妇女中更高(P结论:IVF对妊娠早期结局没有影响。通过体外受精怀孕的妇女与非体外受精怀孕的妇女有相同的流产可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Pregnancy Loss Rate in In Vitro Fertilization Versus Non-IVF Pregnancies.

Objectives: Compare early pregnancy loss (EPL) rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus non-IVF pregnancies to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on first trimester outcome.

Methods: Our study set consisted of all obstetrical ultrasounds at our institution over a 30-year period demonstrating a singleton intrauterine pregnancy (confirmed by either yolk sac but no embryo, or embryo <10 mm with cardiac activity), with known first trimester outcome. We assessed EPL rates based on mode of conception, maternal age, vaginal bleeding, and initial ultrasound finding (yolk sac only or embryo). We compared IVF versus non-IVF pregnancies with respect to EPL rate, maternal age, and vaginal bleeding. Most importantly, we used logistic regression analysis to determine whether IVF has an independent effect on loss rate, after controlling for age and bleeding.

Results: Our study set consisted of 16,458 pregnancies, 1394 (8.5%) resulting from IVF and 15,064 (91.5%) non-IVF. Overall EPL rate was 3348/16,458 (20.3%) and was higher in IVF pregnancies, in women aged ≥35 years, and with vaginal bleeding (P < .001, all comparisons). IVF pregnancies had higher maternal ages and were less likely to have vaginal bleeding as an indication for sonography. Logistic regression of mode of conception, maternal age, and bleeding as predictors of outcome demonstrated that mode of conception had no independent effect on outcome (P = .33 for cases with yolk sac only, P = .30 for cases with embryo).

Conclusions: IVF has no impact on first trimester outcome. A woman pregnant via IVF has the same likelihood of miscarriage as a comparable woman with a non-IVF pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信