基于模拟的产科超声教育训练:应用研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Jinshuang Song, Xi Chen, Jinmao Xu, Lili Yang, Meng Song, Ying Jiang, Li Liu, Jinghua Liu, Hongping Zheng
{"title":"基于模拟的产科超声教育训练:应用研究。","authors":"Jinshuang Song, Xi Chen, Jinmao Xu, Lili Yang, Meng Song, Ying Jiang, Li Liu, Jinghua Liu, Hongping Zheng","doi":"10.1002/jcu.24037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods versus simulation-based learning in clinical ultrasound internships in obstetrics and gynecology.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted to compare three teaching methods: simulation-based teaching, traditional + simulation-based teaching, and traditional teaching.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Affiliated Shenzhen Women and Children's Hospital (Longgang) of Shantou University Medical College) from January 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Population or sample: </strong>A total of 120 clinical interns were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (40 in each): Experimental Group 1 Simulation Teaching Group; Experimental Group 2 Traditional + Simulation Teaching Group; Control Group Traditional Teaching Group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All groups received theoretical and practical ultrasound training, followed by assessment. Teaching performance was evaluated based on teaching time, daily practice opportunities, content mastery, stress levels, error rates in clinical assessments, and long-term knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Teaching time, number of daily practice opportunities, stress levels, content mastery, error rates during practical exams, and long-term knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulation-based teaching significantly improved teaching efficiency, reduced anxiety, and lowered error rates during clinical operations. Long-term knowledge retention was highest in the traditional + simulation group, and combining both teaching methods enhanced skills and knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based teaching, especially when combined with traditional methods, enhances ultrasound training by improving operational skills, reducing stress, and increasing long-term knowledge retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based Training in Obstetric Sonography Education: An Applied Research Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jinshuang Song, Xi Chen, Jinmao Xu, Lili Yang, Meng Song, Ying Jiang, Li Liu, Jinghua Liu, Hongping Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.24037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods versus simulation-based learning in clinical ultrasound internships in obstetrics and gynecology.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted to compare three teaching methods: simulation-based teaching, traditional + simulation-based teaching, and traditional teaching.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Affiliated Shenzhen Women and Children's Hospital (Longgang) of Shantou University Medical College) from January 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Population or sample: </strong>A total of 120 clinical interns were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (40 in each): Experimental Group 1 Simulation Teaching Group; Experimental Group 2 Traditional + Simulation Teaching Group; Control Group Traditional Teaching Group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All groups received theoretical and practical ultrasound training, followed by assessment. Teaching performance was evaluated based on teaching time, daily practice opportunities, content mastery, stress levels, error rates in clinical assessments, and long-term knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Teaching time, number of daily practice opportunities, stress levels, content mastery, error rates during practical exams, and long-term knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulation-based teaching significantly improved teaching efficiency, reduced anxiety, and lowered error rates during clinical operations. Long-term knowledge retention was highest in the traditional + simulation group, and combining both teaching methods enhanced skills and knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based teaching, especially when combined with traditional methods, enhances ultrasound training by improving operational skills, reducing stress, and increasing long-term knowledge retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较传统教学方法与模拟学习方法在妇产科临床超声实习中的效果。设计:采用随机对照研究,比较模拟教学、传统+模拟教学、传统教学三种教学方式。研究地点:研究于2023年1月至2024年12月在深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院(汕头大学医学院附属深圳妇幼医院(龙岗))进行。总体或样本:选取临床实习生120人,随机分为3组(每组40人):实验组1模拟教学组;实验2组传统+模拟教学组;对照组传统教学组。方法:各组均接受超声理论和实践训练,并进行考核。根据教学时间、日常实践机会、内容掌握程度、压力水平、临床评估错误率和长期知识记忆来评估教学绩效。主要衡量指标:教学时间、日常练习机会、压力水平、内容掌握程度、实践考试中的错误率和长期知识保留。结果:模拟教学能显著提高教学效率,减少临床操作过程中的焦虑情绪,降低临床操作错误率。传统+模拟组学生的长期知识保留率最高,两种教学方法的结合提高了学生的技能和知识保留率。结论:以模拟为基础的教学,特别是与传统方法相结合,通过提高操作技能、减轻压力和增加长期知识记忆来加强超声训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation-Based Training in Obstetric Sonography Education: An Applied Research Study.

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods versus simulation-based learning in clinical ultrasound internships in obstetrics and gynecology.

Design: A randomized controlled study was conducted to compare three teaching methods: simulation-based teaching, traditional + simulation-based teaching, and traditional teaching.

Setting: The study was conducted at Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Affiliated Shenzhen Women and Children's Hospital (Longgang) of Shantou University Medical College) from January 2023 to December 2024.

Population or sample: A total of 120 clinical interns were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (40 in each): Experimental Group 1 Simulation Teaching Group; Experimental Group 2 Traditional + Simulation Teaching Group; Control Group Traditional Teaching Group.

Methods: All groups received theoretical and practical ultrasound training, followed by assessment. Teaching performance was evaluated based on teaching time, daily practice opportunities, content mastery, stress levels, error rates in clinical assessments, and long-term knowledge retention.

Main outcome measures: Teaching time, number of daily practice opportunities, stress levels, content mastery, error rates during practical exams, and long-term knowledge retention.

Results: Simulation-based teaching significantly improved teaching efficiency, reduced anxiety, and lowered error rates during clinical operations. Long-term knowledge retention was highest in the traditional + simulation group, and combining both teaching methods enhanced skills and knowledge retention.

Conclusions: Simulation-based teaching, especially when combined with traditional methods, enhances ultrasound training by improving operational skills, reducing stress, and increasing long-term knowledge retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信