紧急剖宫产术中硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉与标准硬膜外麻醉的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S514780
Shuangqiong Zhou, Xiuhong Cao, Yao Zhou, Zhendong Xu
{"title":"紧急剖宫产术中硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉与标准硬膜外麻醉的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Shuangqiong Zhou, Xiuhong Cao, Yao Zhou, Zhendong Xu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S514780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dural-puncture epidural (DPE) and standard epidural (EP) techniques are well-established methods for neuraxial analgesia during labor. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the conversion of DPE-induced labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia during cesarean sections, particularly regarding efficacy and timing. This study will compare the surgical anesthesia onset time between DPE and EP in parturients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery after conversion from labor analgesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized clinical study will include 124 parturients. Parturients aged ≥18 years with singleton pregnancies who request labor analgesia will be randomly assigned to receive either DPE or EP anesthesia in the labor and delivery rooms. Participants will be excluded if they have contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, back surgery or scoliosis history, significant fetal anomalies, or a known allergy to any of the study medications. Epidural labor analgesia will be maintained using a low concentration of ropivacaine in combination with sufentanil, delivered through the epidural catheter. During delivery, an emergency intrapartum cesarean section following labor analgesia may be necessary among these parturients. Parturients requiring intrapartum cesarean delivery following labor analgesia will be eligible. Epidural extension anesthesia will be administered in the operating room. The primary outcome measure will be the time from chloroprocaine administration to the achievement of a surgical level of anesthesia, defined as a T6 sensory block. Secondary outcomes will include epidural anesthesia quality, incidence of conversion to cesarean section between the two techniques, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will estimate the onset time to achieve surgical anesthesia during epidural extension using a DPE compared to an EP technique. The results may provide a deeper understanding of the advantages of the DPE technique in labor analgesia, as well as determine the onset time and reliability of anesthesia block during conversion from labor analgesia to cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2400089237. Registered September 4, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2509-2519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Surgical Anesthesia Onset Between Dural-Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Techniques for Emergency Cesarean Section: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shuangqiong Zhou, Xiuhong Cao, Yao Zhou, Zhendong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S514780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dural-puncture epidural (DPE) and standard epidural (EP) techniques are well-established methods for neuraxial analgesia during labor. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the conversion of DPE-induced labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia during cesarean sections, particularly regarding efficacy and timing. This study will compare the surgical anesthesia onset time between DPE and EP in parturients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery after conversion from labor analgesia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized clinical study will include 124 parturients. Parturients aged ≥18 years with singleton pregnancies who request labor analgesia will be randomly assigned to receive either DPE or EP anesthesia in the labor and delivery rooms. Participants will be excluded if they have contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, back surgery or scoliosis history, significant fetal anomalies, or a known allergy to any of the study medications. Epidural labor analgesia will be maintained using a low concentration of ropivacaine in combination with sufentanil, delivered through the epidural catheter. During delivery, an emergency intrapartum cesarean section following labor analgesia may be necessary among these parturients. Parturients requiring intrapartum cesarean delivery following labor analgesia will be eligible. Epidural extension anesthesia will be administered in the operating room. The primary outcome measure will be the time from chloroprocaine administration to the achievement of a surgical level of anesthesia, defined as a T6 sensory block. Secondary outcomes will include epidural anesthesia quality, incidence of conversion to cesarean section between the two techniques, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will estimate the onset time to achieve surgical anesthesia during epidural extension using a DPE compared to an EP technique. The results may provide a deeper understanding of the advantages of the DPE technique in labor analgesia, as well as determine the onset time and reliability of anesthesia block during conversion from labor analgesia to cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2400089237. Registered September 4, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2509-2519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S514780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S514780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:硬膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)和标准硬膜外(EP)技术是产程中轴神经性镇痛的成熟方法。然而,关于剖宫产术中dpe诱导的分娩镇痛转化为手术麻醉的知识有限,特别是关于疗效和时机。本研究将比较DPE与EP在剖宫产急诊产妇镇痛转换后的手术麻醉起效时间。患者和方法:这项双盲、随机临床研究将包括124名产妇。年龄≥18岁、单胎妊娠且要求分娩镇痛的产妇将被随机分配在产房和产房接受DPE或EP麻醉。如果参与者有神经轴麻醉禁忌症、背部手术或脊柱侧凸史、明显的胎儿异常或已知对任何研究药物过敏,则将被排除。通过硬膜外导管,低浓度罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼维持硬膜外分娩镇痛。在分娩过程中,这些患者可能需要在分娩镇痛后进行紧急剖宫产术。需要在分娩镇痛后进行剖宫产的产妇将符合条件。在手术室进行硬膜外延伸麻醉。主要观察指标将是氯普鲁卡因给药到达到手术麻醉水平的时间,定义为T6感觉阻滞。次要结局将包括硬膜外麻醉质量、两种技术之间转换为剖宫产的发生率以及孕产妇和新生儿结局。结论:本研究将评估在硬膜外延伸术中使用DPE和EP技术实现手术麻醉的起始时间。本研究结果可为进一步了解DPE技术在分娩镇痛中的优势,以及确定分娩镇痛向剖宫产转化过程中麻醉阻滞的起效时间和可靠性提供依据。试验注册:ChiCTR2400089237。注册于2024年9月4日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Surgical Anesthesia Onset Between Dural-Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Techniques for Emergency Cesarean Section: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: The dural-puncture epidural (DPE) and standard epidural (EP) techniques are well-established methods for neuraxial analgesia during labor. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the conversion of DPE-induced labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia during cesarean sections, particularly regarding efficacy and timing. This study will compare the surgical anesthesia onset time between DPE and EP in parturients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery after conversion from labor analgesia.

Patients and methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical study will include 124 parturients. Parturients aged ≥18 years with singleton pregnancies who request labor analgesia will be randomly assigned to receive either DPE or EP anesthesia in the labor and delivery rooms. Participants will be excluded if they have contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, back surgery or scoliosis history, significant fetal anomalies, or a known allergy to any of the study medications. Epidural labor analgesia will be maintained using a low concentration of ropivacaine in combination with sufentanil, delivered through the epidural catheter. During delivery, an emergency intrapartum cesarean section following labor analgesia may be necessary among these parturients. Parturients requiring intrapartum cesarean delivery following labor analgesia will be eligible. Epidural extension anesthesia will be administered in the operating room. The primary outcome measure will be the time from chloroprocaine administration to the achievement of a surgical level of anesthesia, defined as a T6 sensory block. Secondary outcomes will include epidural anesthesia quality, incidence of conversion to cesarean section between the two techniques, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: This study will estimate the onset time to achieve surgical anesthesia during epidural extension using a DPE compared to an EP technique. The results may provide a deeper understanding of the advantages of the DPE technique in labor analgesia, as well as determine the onset time and reliability of anesthesia block during conversion from labor analgesia to cesarean delivery.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2400089237. Registered September 4, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信