印度浦那及周边城市和农村人口血清维生素D3和维生素B12缺乏的患病率:一项观察性研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Swati Ghonge, Hetal Rathod, Amitav Banerjee, Shweta Chauhan, Tanu Baxi, Deepu Palal, Jitendra Bhawalkar, Sai Mahesh Vajjala
{"title":"印度浦那及周边城市和农村人口血清维生素D3和维生素B12缺乏的患病率:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Swati Ghonge, Hetal Rathod, Amitav Banerjee, Shweta Chauhan, Tanu Baxi, Deepu Palal, Jitendra Bhawalkar, Sai Mahesh Vajjala","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1511_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vitamin D and vitamin B12 deficiencies are major public health problems in many populations. Studies report a deficiency in the range of 20-80% of both micronutrients. Hence, a comparative study was conducted among a rural and an urban population to see the prevalence and factors associated with their deficiency.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The institutional ethics committee approved the study. Informed consent was taken from all the participants. Cross-sectional comparative analytical study among participants of rural and urban field practice areas of a medical college was undertaken. Measurements were made on 121 participants, 67 from urban areas, and 54 from rural regions. Participants were selected in a simple random sampling technique. Blood samples were collected in a standardized technique following aseptic conditions and transported to the laboratory maintaining a cold chain for analysis. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Jamovi v2.4.11. Chi-square test, <i>t</i>-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used, and tests of significance with <i>P</i> < 0.05 cut-off for rejecting the null hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Apart from education, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status, all factors were similar among rural and urban participants. The mean BMI of urban participants was more than rural counterparts. Deficiency of vitamin B12 was 52.2% in urban and 64.8% in rural areas; deficiency of vitamin D was 34.3% in urban and 13% in the rural sample. Mean values of vitamin D and vitamin B12 were significantly different, 17.77 ng/mL vis-a-vis 19.02 ng/mL and 254.82 pg/mL vis-a-vis 185.48 pg/mL, respectively, for urban and rural participants. Vitamin D was more deficient in urban areas, and vitamin B12 was more deficient in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both deficiencies found in the participants are of concern and require different interventions. Urban participants should be advised more of outdoor activities, and rural participants should be educated more on dietary interventions. Supplements at the individual level may be advised as needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 4","pages":"1231-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of deficiencies of serum vitamin D3 and vitamin B12 among urban and rural population in and around Pune, India: An observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Swati Ghonge, Hetal Rathod, Amitav Banerjee, Shweta Chauhan, Tanu Baxi, Deepu Palal, Jitendra Bhawalkar, Sai Mahesh Vajjala\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1511_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vitamin D and vitamin B12 deficiencies are major public health problems in many populations. Studies report a deficiency in the range of 20-80% of both micronutrients. Hence, a comparative study was conducted among a rural and an urban population to see the prevalence and factors associated with their deficiency.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The institutional ethics committee approved the study. Informed consent was taken from all the participants. Cross-sectional comparative analytical study among participants of rural and urban field practice areas of a medical college was undertaken. Measurements were made on 121 participants, 67 from urban areas, and 54 from rural regions. Participants were selected in a simple random sampling technique. Blood samples were collected in a standardized technique following aseptic conditions and transported to the laboratory maintaining a cold chain for analysis. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Jamovi v2.4.11. Chi-square test, <i>t</i>-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used, and tests of significance with <i>P</i> < 0.05 cut-off for rejecting the null hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Apart from education, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status, all factors were similar among rural and urban participants. The mean BMI of urban participants was more than rural counterparts. Deficiency of vitamin B12 was 52.2% in urban and 64.8% in rural areas; deficiency of vitamin D was 34.3% in urban and 13% in the rural sample. Mean values of vitamin D and vitamin B12 were significantly different, 17.77 ng/mL vis-a-vis 19.02 ng/mL and 254.82 pg/mL vis-a-vis 185.48 pg/mL, respectively, for urban and rural participants. Vitamin D was more deficient in urban areas, and vitamin B12 was more deficient in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both deficiencies found in the participants are of concern and require different interventions. Urban participants should be advised more of outdoor activities, and rural participants should be educated more on dietary interventions. Supplements at the individual level may be advised as needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"1231-1237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1511_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1511_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:维生素D和维生素B12缺乏是许多人群的主要公共卫生问题。研究报告称,这两种微量营养素的缺乏率在20-80%之间。因此,在农村和城市人口中进行了一项比较研究,以了解他们缺乏的患病率和相关因素。方法:机构伦理委员会批准了这项研究。获得了所有参与者的知情同意。对某医学院农村和城市实习区被试进行横断面比较分析研究。对121名参与者进行了测量,其中67名来自城市地区,54名来自农村地区。参与者是通过简单的随机抽样技术选择的。血液样本在无菌条件下以标准化技术收集,并运输到实验室,保持冷链进行分析。数据输入到Microsoft Excel中,使用Jamovi v2.4.11进行分析。采用卡方检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,并采用P < 0.05的显著性检验拒绝原假设。结果:除了受教育程度、身体质量指数(BMI)和社会经济地位外,农村和城市参与者的所有因素都相似。城市参与者的平均身体质量指数高于农村参与者。城市和农村维生素B12缺乏率分别为52.2%和64.8%;维生素D缺乏症在城市和农村分别为34.3%和13%。城市和农村参与者的维生素D和维生素B12的平均值分别为17.77 ng/mL和19.02 ng/mL,分别为254.82 pg/mL和185.48 pg/mL,差异显著。城市地区更缺乏维生素D,农村地区更缺乏维生素B12。结论:在参与者中发现的这两种缺陷值得关注,需要不同的干预措施。应建议城市参与者更多地进行户外活动,而农村参与者应更多地接受饮食干预方面的教育。根据需要,可以建议在个人水平上补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of deficiencies of serum vitamin D3 and vitamin B12 among urban and rural population in and around Pune, India: An observational study.

Introduction: Vitamin D and vitamin B12 deficiencies are major public health problems in many populations. Studies report a deficiency in the range of 20-80% of both micronutrients. Hence, a comparative study was conducted among a rural and an urban population to see the prevalence and factors associated with their deficiency.

Methodology: The institutional ethics committee approved the study. Informed consent was taken from all the participants. Cross-sectional comparative analytical study among participants of rural and urban field practice areas of a medical college was undertaken. Measurements were made on 121 participants, 67 from urban areas, and 54 from rural regions. Participants were selected in a simple random sampling technique. Blood samples were collected in a standardized technique following aseptic conditions and transported to the laboratory maintaining a cold chain for analysis. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Jamovi v2.4.11. Chi-square test, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used, and tests of significance with P < 0.05 cut-off for rejecting the null hypothesis.

Results: Apart from education, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status, all factors were similar among rural and urban participants. The mean BMI of urban participants was more than rural counterparts. Deficiency of vitamin B12 was 52.2% in urban and 64.8% in rural areas; deficiency of vitamin D was 34.3% in urban and 13% in the rural sample. Mean values of vitamin D and vitamin B12 were significantly different, 17.77 ng/mL vis-a-vis 19.02 ng/mL and 254.82 pg/mL vis-a-vis 185.48 pg/mL, respectively, for urban and rural participants. Vitamin D was more deficient in urban areas, and vitamin B12 was more deficient in rural areas.

Conclusion: Both deficiencies found in the participants are of concern and require different interventions. Urban participants should be advised more of outdoor activities, and rural participants should be educated more on dietary interventions. Supplements at the individual level may be advised as needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信