Shengxiang Hou, Zonghao Hou, Li Ren, Zhixin Wang, Haijiu Wang, Chengwei Tie, Manjun Deng, Haining Fan
{"title":"胰切除术后常规腹腔引流:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析。","authors":"Shengxiang Hou, Zonghao Hou, Li Ren, Zhixin Wang, Haijiu Wang, Chengwei Tie, Manjun Deng, Haining Fan","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on post-pancreatectomy complications, a topic that is still debated in the medical community.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang Data, focusing on studies comparing intraperitoneal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Key outcomes included postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, mortality, complications, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage,intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess,postoperative bleeding, interventional radiology drainage, reoperation, and unplanned readmissions. Statistical analyses were conducted using either a Beta Normal Hierarchical Model or a random-effects model, providing combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed based on surgical procedures, specifically Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) and Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis, incorporating 5 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs, identified a significant link between routine abdominal drainage and higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and unplanned readmissions.The overall ORs were 2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63), 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65) . In the DP subgroup, the ORs were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00), 2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21), and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18). In the PD subgroup, the ORs were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19), and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60). The use of drainage was associated with a decreased mortality following PD, with an OR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),however, this association was not observed in relation to other surgical methods. No significant differences were found among the groups for the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For surgeries other than PD, omitting drainage tubes may benefit patients postoperatively. However, unselected cessation of intraperitoneal drainage after PD correlates with reduced pancreatic fistulas but higher mortality. Future randomized trials should compare routine versus selective drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine abdominal drainage after pancreatectomy: A Byesian meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shengxiang Hou, Zonghao Hou, Li Ren, Zhixin Wang, Haijiu Wang, Chengwei Tie, Manjun Deng, Haining Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on post-pancreatectomy complications, a topic that is still debated in the medical community.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang Data, focusing on studies comparing intraperitoneal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Key outcomes included postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, mortality, complications, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage,intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess,postoperative bleeding, interventional radiology drainage, reoperation, and unplanned readmissions. Statistical analyses were conducted using either a Beta Normal Hierarchical Model or a random-effects model, providing combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed based on surgical procedures, specifically Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) and Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis, incorporating 5 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs, identified a significant link between routine abdominal drainage and higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and unplanned readmissions.The overall ORs were 2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63), 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65) . In the DP subgroup, the ORs were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00), 2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21), and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18). In the PD subgroup, the ORs were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19), and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60). The use of drainage was associated with a decreased mortality following PD, with an OR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),however, this association was not observed in relation to other surgical methods. No significant differences were found among the groups for the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For surgeries other than PD, omitting drainage tubes may benefit patients postoperatively. However, unselected cessation of intraperitoneal drainage after PD correlates with reduced pancreatic fistulas but higher mortality. Future randomized trials should compare routine versus selective drainage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Routine abdominal drainage after pancreatectomy: A Byesian meta-analysis.
Objective: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on post-pancreatectomy complications, a topic that is still debated in the medical community.
Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang Data, focusing on studies comparing intraperitoneal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Key outcomes included postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, mortality, complications, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage,intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess,postoperative bleeding, interventional radiology drainage, reoperation, and unplanned readmissions. Statistical analyses were conducted using either a Beta Normal Hierarchical Model or a random-effects model, providing combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed based on surgical procedures, specifically Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) and Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
Results: This meta-analysis, incorporating 5 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs, identified a significant link between routine abdominal drainage and higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and unplanned readmissions.The overall ORs were 2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63), 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65) . In the DP subgroup, the ORs were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00), 2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21), and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18). In the PD subgroup, the ORs were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19), and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60). The use of drainage was associated with a decreased mortality following PD, with an OR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),however, this association was not observed in relation to other surgical methods. No significant differences were found among the groups for the other outcomes.
Conclusion: For surgeries other than PD, omitting drainage tubes may benefit patients postoperatively. However, unselected cessation of intraperitoneal drainage after PD correlates with reduced pancreatic fistulas but higher mortality. Future randomized trials should compare routine versus selective drainage.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.