Jianpeng Liu, Shufan Jiang, Yanfei Wu, Ruoyao Zou, Yifang Bao, Na Wang, Jiaqi Tu, Ji Xiong, Ying Liu, Yuxin Li
{"title":"基于深度学习的放射组学和机器学习在idh野生型胶质母细胞瘤最大安全手术切除后的预后评估:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Jianpeng Liu, Shufan Jiang, Yanfei Wu, Ruoyao Zou, Yifang Bao, Na Wang, Jiaqi Tu, Ji Xiong, Ying Liu, Yuxin Li","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct and validate a radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting overall survival (OS) in IDH-wildtype GBM after maximal safe surgical resection using magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 582 patients were retrospectively enrolled, comprising 301 in the training cohort, 128 in the internal validation cohort, and 153 in the external validation cohort. Volumes of interest (VOIs) from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) were segmented into three regions: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrotic non-enhancing core, and peritumoral edema using an ResNet-based segmentation network. A total of 4,227 radiomic features were extracted and filtered using LASSO-Cox regression to identify signatures. The prognostic model was constructed using the Mime prediction framework, categorizing patients into high- and low-risk groups based on the median OS. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (CI) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Independent prognostic factors were identified through multivariable Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram was developed for individualized risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Step Cox [backward] + RSF model achieved CIs of 0.89, 0.81, and 0.76 in the training, internal and external validation cohorts. Log-rank tests demonstrated significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups across all cohorts (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified age (HR: 1.022; 95% CI: 0.979, 1.009, P < 0.05), KPS score (HR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.960, 0.978, P < 0.05), rad-scores of the necrotic non-enhancing core (HR: 8.164; 95% CI: 2.439, 27.331, P < 0.05), and peritumoral edema (HR: 3.748; 95% CI: 1.212, 11.594, P < 0.05) as independent predictors of OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors provided individualized risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This deep learning segmentation-based radiomics model demonstrated robust performance in predicting OS in GBM after maximal safe surgical resection. By incorporating radiomic signatures and advanced machine learning algorithms, it offers a non-invasive tool for personalized prognostic assessment and supports clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based radiomics and machine learning for prognostic assessment in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma after maximal safe surgical resection: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Jianpeng Liu, Shufan Jiang, Yanfei Wu, Ruoyao Zou, Yifang Bao, Na Wang, Jiaqi Tu, Ji Xiong, Ying Liu, Yuxin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct and validate a radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting overall survival (OS) in IDH-wildtype GBM after maximal safe surgical resection using magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 582 patients were retrospectively enrolled, comprising 301 in the training cohort, 128 in the internal validation cohort, and 153 in the external validation cohort. Volumes of interest (VOIs) from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) were segmented into three regions: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrotic non-enhancing core, and peritumoral edema using an ResNet-based segmentation network. A total of 4,227 radiomic features were extracted and filtered using LASSO-Cox regression to identify signatures. The prognostic model was constructed using the Mime prediction framework, categorizing patients into high- and low-risk groups based on the median OS. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (CI) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Independent prognostic factors were identified through multivariable Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram was developed for individualized risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Step Cox [backward] + RSF model achieved CIs of 0.89, 0.81, and 0.76 in the training, internal and external validation cohorts. Log-rank tests demonstrated significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups across all cohorts (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified age (HR: 1.022; 95% CI: 0.979, 1.009, P < 0.05), KPS score (HR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.960, 0.978, P < 0.05), rad-scores of the necrotic non-enhancing core (HR: 8.164; 95% CI: 2.439, 27.331, P < 0.05), and peritumoral edema (HR: 3.748; 95% CI: 1.212, 11.594, P < 0.05) as independent predictors of OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors provided individualized risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This deep learning segmentation-based radiomics model demonstrated robust performance in predicting OS in GBM after maximal safe surgical resection. By incorporating radiomic signatures and advanced machine learning algorithms, it offers a non-invasive tool for personalized prognostic assessment and supports clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002488\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种侵袭性强、预后差的脑肿瘤。本研究旨在构建并验证基于放射组学的机器学习模型,用于预测idh -野生型GBM在最大安全手术切除后的总生存期(OS)。方法:回顾性纳入582例患者,其中培训组301例,内部验证组128例,外部验证组153例。使用基于resnet的分割网络,将对比增强t1加权成像(CE-T1WI)的感兴趣体积(VOIs)分割为三个区域:对比增强肿瘤、坏死非增强核心和肿瘤周围水肿。利用LASSO-Cox回归对4227个放射性特征进行提取和滤波,识别特征。采用Mime预测框架构建预后模型,根据中位OS将患者分为高危组和低危组。采用一致性指数(CI)和Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估模型的性能。通过多变量Cox回归分析确定独立预后因素,并制定个体化风险评估的nomogram。结果:Step Cox [backward] + RSF模型在训练、内部和外部验证队列中的ci分别为0.89、0.81和0.76。Log-rank检验显示,所有队列中高危组和低危组的生存率存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。多因素Cox分析确定年龄(HR: 1.022;95% CI: 0.979, 1.009, P < 0.05), KPS评分(HR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.960, 0.978, P < 0.05),坏死非增强核心的rad评分(HR: 8.164;95% CI: 2.439, 27.331, P < 0.05),肿瘤周围水肿(HR: 3.748;95% CI: 1.212, 11.594, P < 0.05)作为OS的独立预测因子。综合这些预测因素的nomogram提供了个体化的风险评估。结论:这种基于深度学习分割的放射组学模型在预测最大安全手术切除后GBM的OS方面表现出强大的性能。通过结合放射特征和先进的机器学习算法,它为个性化预后评估提供了一种非侵入性工具,并支持临床决策。
Deep learning-based radiomics and machine learning for prognostic assessment in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma after maximal safe surgical resection: a multicenter study.
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct and validate a radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting overall survival (OS) in IDH-wildtype GBM after maximal safe surgical resection using magnetic resonance imaging.
Methods: A total of 582 patients were retrospectively enrolled, comprising 301 in the training cohort, 128 in the internal validation cohort, and 153 in the external validation cohort. Volumes of interest (VOIs) from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) were segmented into three regions: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrotic non-enhancing core, and peritumoral edema using an ResNet-based segmentation network. A total of 4,227 radiomic features were extracted and filtered using LASSO-Cox regression to identify signatures. The prognostic model was constructed using the Mime prediction framework, categorizing patients into high- and low-risk groups based on the median OS. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (CI) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Independent prognostic factors were identified through multivariable Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram was developed for individualized risk assessment.
Results: The Step Cox [backward] + RSF model achieved CIs of 0.89, 0.81, and 0.76 in the training, internal and external validation cohorts. Log-rank tests demonstrated significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups across all cohorts (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified age (HR: 1.022; 95% CI: 0.979, 1.009, P < 0.05), KPS score (HR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.960, 0.978, P < 0.05), rad-scores of the necrotic non-enhancing core (HR: 8.164; 95% CI: 2.439, 27.331, P < 0.05), and peritumoral edema (HR: 3.748; 95% CI: 1.212, 11.594, P < 0.05) as independent predictors of OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors provided individualized risk assessment.
Conclusion: This deep learning segmentation-based radiomics model demonstrated robust performance in predicting OS in GBM after maximal safe surgical resection. By incorporating radiomic signatures and advanced machine learning algorithms, it offers a non-invasive tool for personalized prognostic assessment and supports clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.