一岁以下婴儿长骨骨折的年代测定。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Amandine Capelli, Luisa Nogueira, Frédéric Santos, Béatrice Leloutre, Marco Albertario, Caroline Bernardi, Véronique Alunni
{"title":"一岁以下婴儿长骨骨折的年代测定。","authors":"Amandine Capelli, Luisa Nogueira, Frédéric Santos, Béatrice Leloutre, Marco Albertario, Caroline Bernardi, Véronique Alunni","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03518-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infants under one year of age frequently suffer from inflicted fractures. Dating the trauma is vitally important to identify the perpetrator and ensure the protection of the child. While several studies have investigated the radiological dating of fractures in children, few have focused specifically on those occurring during the first year of life. Although maltreatment is particularly common in the first few months of life, dating these fractures remains challenging, as bone healing capacity is age-dependent and may differ from that observed in older children. In addition, the radiological nomenclature found in the literature is heterogeneous and often imprecise.The aim of this study was to apply clearly defined radiographic criteria to establish an analytical methodology that facilitates the dating of long bone fractures in infants under one year of age. A total of 99 infants under one year old with long bone fractures of known date were included, representing 290 radiograph sets. Four dating groups were defined based on literature data, with the aim of developing predictive models based on well-defined radiographic features, in order to construct a simplified dating decision tree.Our findings suggest that the absence of periosteal apposition and bone remodeling is consistent with a fracture less than one week old. On the other hand, the presence of periosteal apposition suggests a fracture that is probably one to eight weeks old, and more than one month old when accompanied by signs of remodeling. Finally, isolated signs of remodeling are suggestive of a fracture of more than two months.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dating long bone fractures of infants under one year of age.\",\"authors\":\"Amandine Capelli, Luisa Nogueira, Frédéric Santos, Béatrice Leloutre, Marco Albertario, Caroline Bernardi, Véronique Alunni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00414-025-03518-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infants under one year of age frequently suffer from inflicted fractures. Dating the trauma is vitally important to identify the perpetrator and ensure the protection of the child. While several studies have investigated the radiological dating of fractures in children, few have focused specifically on those occurring during the first year of life. Although maltreatment is particularly common in the first few months of life, dating these fractures remains challenging, as bone healing capacity is age-dependent and may differ from that observed in older children. In addition, the radiological nomenclature found in the literature is heterogeneous and often imprecise.The aim of this study was to apply clearly defined radiographic criteria to establish an analytical methodology that facilitates the dating of long bone fractures in infants under one year of age. A total of 99 infants under one year old with long bone fractures of known date were included, representing 290 radiograph sets. Four dating groups were defined based on literature data, with the aim of developing predictive models based on well-defined radiographic features, in order to construct a simplified dating decision tree.Our findings suggest that the absence of periosteal apposition and bone remodeling is consistent with a fracture less than one week old. On the other hand, the presence of periosteal apposition suggests a fracture that is probably one to eight weeks old, and more than one month old when accompanied by signs of remodeling. Finally, isolated signs of remodeling are suggestive of a fracture of more than two months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03518-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03518-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一岁以下的婴儿经常遭受外伤骨折。确定创伤的时间对于确定肇事者和确保对儿童的保护至关重要。虽然有几项研究调查了儿童骨折的放射性定年,但很少有研究专门关注那些发生在生命第一年的骨折。尽管虐待在出生后的最初几个月尤为常见,但确定这些骨折的时间仍然具有挑战性,因为骨愈合能力与年龄有关,可能与年龄较大的儿童不同。此外,在文献中发现的放射学命名法是异质的,往往不精确。本研究的目的是应用明确定义的放射学标准来建立一种分析方法,以促进一岁以下婴儿长骨骨折的年代测定。共有99名一岁以下已知时间长骨骨折的婴儿,290组x线片。根据文献数据定义了四个测年组,目的是基于明确定义的放射学特征开发预测模型,以构建简化的测年决策树。我们的研究结果表明,骨膜附着和骨重塑的缺失与不到一周的骨折一致。另一方面,骨膜侧位的存在提示骨折可能发生在1 - 8周,如果伴有骨重塑的迹象则可能超过1个月。最后,孤立的重塑迹象提示骨折超过两个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dating long bone fractures of infants under one year of age.

Infants under one year of age frequently suffer from inflicted fractures. Dating the trauma is vitally important to identify the perpetrator and ensure the protection of the child. While several studies have investigated the radiological dating of fractures in children, few have focused specifically on those occurring during the first year of life. Although maltreatment is particularly common in the first few months of life, dating these fractures remains challenging, as bone healing capacity is age-dependent and may differ from that observed in older children. In addition, the radiological nomenclature found in the literature is heterogeneous and often imprecise.The aim of this study was to apply clearly defined radiographic criteria to establish an analytical methodology that facilitates the dating of long bone fractures in infants under one year of age. A total of 99 infants under one year old with long bone fractures of known date were included, representing 290 radiograph sets. Four dating groups were defined based on literature data, with the aim of developing predictive models based on well-defined radiographic features, in order to construct a simplified dating decision tree.Our findings suggest that the absence of periosteal apposition and bone remodeling is consistent with a fracture less than one week old. On the other hand, the presence of periosteal apposition suggests a fracture that is probably one to eight weeks old, and more than one month old when accompanied by signs of remodeling. Finally, isolated signs of remodeling are suggestive of a fracture of more than two months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信